tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17839575.post5624098165469645766..comments2024-03-17T23:50:03.863+08:00Comments on Government and Taxes: Climate Tricks 13: Block Skeptics and Keep Fooling the PublicBienvenido Oplas Jrhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07799756132761366267noreply@blogger.comBlogger20125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17839575.post-23495092595415737742012-08-12T09:41:37.316+08:002012-08-12T09:41:37.316+08:00Peter, right. Al Gore does not allow comments in h...Peter, right. Al Gore does not allow comments in his blog, does not allow certain questions in many of his speeches.<br /><br />Al, I think all warming fanatics who drop a comment here are either anonymous or have aliases, cannot give their full name and affiliation. Another indicator of cowardice.Bienvenido Oplas Jrhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07799756132761366267noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17839575.post-14690873879965703342012-08-10T18:10:28.369+08:002012-08-10T18:10:28.369+08:00No further comments from the two persons who suppo...No further comments from the two persons who support man-made global warming (AGW)!!! This validates the idea that people who support AGW either don't have any clue what it's all about or have a very grave misunderstanding of the hypothesis.Al_Pnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17839575.post-50991428225282117682012-08-10T18:08:31.948+08:002012-08-10T18:08:31.948+08:00No further comments from the two persons who suppo...No further comments from the two persons who support man-made global warming (AGW)!!! This validates the idea that people who support AGW either don't have any clue what it's all about or have a very grave misunderstanding of the hypothesis.Al_Pnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17839575.post-2160149385460622132012-08-09T13:37:28.309+08:002012-08-09T13:37:28.309+08:00Noy, you forgot to mention the greatest of the AGW...Noy, you forgot to mention the greatest of the AGW pompom-ers, the One, Albert Arnold Gore! Who does not take questions either. Ever.forzamillanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05161335314304521335noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17839575.post-2704938999954679872012-08-07T19:56:12.067+08:002012-08-07T19:56:12.067+08:00To Anonymous,
What exactly is the good point of t...To Anonymous,<br /><br />What exactly is the good point of the Koch-funded study?Al_Pnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17839575.post-85530208118895852372012-08-07T10:10:37.744+08:002012-08-07T10:10:37.744+08:00Good point about the Koch-funded study.Good point about the Koch-funded study.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17839575.post-23370286674279977812012-08-04T02:33:22.990+08:002012-08-04T02:33:22.990+08:00To Anonymous,
So, what's your point with the ...To Anonymous,<br /><br />So, what's your point with the link you posted? If you really understand the debate, post your ideas, not a link of what other people think.<br /><br />By the way, vile language will get you nowhere. Just shows your very poor upbringing.Al_Pnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17839575.post-49425449037587578502012-08-04T01:50:55.190+08:002012-08-04T01:50:55.190+08:00GabbyD,
Based on your understanding, what exactly...GabbyD,<br /><br />Based on your understanding, what exactly is the AGW Hypothesis? This will aide in focusing the discussion on AGW, not anything else.Al_Pnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17839575.post-91411967998165110792012-07-30T22:24:06.160+08:002012-07-30T22:24:06.160+08:00http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-pn-kochfun...http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-pn-kochfunded-climate-change-skeptic-reverses-course-20120729,0,7372823.story?track=rss&utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+latimes%2Fnews%2Fpolitics+%28L.A.+Times+-+Politics%29Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17839575.post-43243274589511631392012-07-29T16:41:02.261+08:002012-07-29T16:41:02.261+08:00thanks for hanging on. Invite other warmers to vis...thanks for hanging on. Invite other warmers to visit and debate here. I assure you, all counter-arguments are 100 percent allowed, zero banning or blocking, unlike the chief warming priests and priestess WWF, Greenpeace and Tony la Vina.Bienvenido Oplas Jrhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07799756132761366267noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17839575.post-6821540217858206802012-07-29T05:44:03.390+08:002012-07-29T05:44:03.390+08:00your comment proves my point. this has nothing to ...your comment proves my point. this has nothing to do with man made global warming. <br /><br />great, im glad you agree.<br /><br />also, on the issue of banning...<br /><br />i dont know what u wrote so i cannot say. my own take is as long as you want to communicate, banning is wrong.<br /><br />but if all you want is to insult, or harangue, then by all means, ban them.GabbyDnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17839575.post-40654260936939396462012-07-28T15:37:14.099+08:002012-07-28T15:37:14.099+08:00Getting emotional with lots of all caps eh? :-)
A...Getting emotional with lots of all caps eh? :-)<br /><br />As the opening paragraph above says, <br /><br />"The question of “which comes first, the temperature or the CO2 rise?” has been much like the proverbial “which came first, the chicken or the egg?” question. This seems to settle it – temperature came first, followed by an increase in CO2 outgassing from the ocean surrounding Antarctica...."Bienvenido Oplas Jrhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07799756132761366267noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17839575.post-39509372508810217012012-07-28T15:31:30.655+08:002012-07-28T15:31:30.655+08:00NO. please quote anything in that paper that goes ...NO. please quote anything in that paper that goes against anthropomorphic global warming. it should be easy.<br /><br />as the part i quoted said, warming releases CO2. no problem -- nothing in anthro warming says that cannot happen. <br /><br />anthro warming says C02 CAUSES climate change.<br /><br />please, point to ANYTHING in that paper that proves that that didnt happen. ANYTHING.GabbyDnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17839575.post-59337140422853389022012-07-28T14:16:09.334+08:002012-07-28T14:16:09.334+08:00Poor understanding again. The AGW hypothesis is ve...Poor understanding again. The AGW hypothesis is very adamant in its position: CO2 leads temperature change. So more CO2, more warming. The WUWT article on Antarctica says it's the reverse. So the AGW assertion is pure fiction.Bienvenido Oplas Jrhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07799756132761366267noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17839575.post-84913088202936847982012-07-28T14:05:51.109+08:002012-07-28T14:05:51.109+08:00NO.
"He explains that one of the theories is...NO.<br /><br />"He explains that one of the theories is that when Antarctica warms up, there will be stronger winds over the Southern Ocean and the winds pump more water up from the deep bottom layers in the ocean where there is a high content of CO2 from all of the small organisms that die and fall down to the sea floor and rot. When strong winds blow over the Southern Ocean, the ocean circulation brings more of the CO2-rich bottom water up to the surface and a portion of this CO2 is released into the atmosphere. This process links temperature and CO2 together and the new results suggest that the linking is closer and happens faster than previously believed."<br /><br />see, he explains why the lag behavior is the way it is; which has NOTHING to do with anthropomorphic global warming.<br /><br />it has NOTHING to do with the theory of greenhouse gases can cause changes in the climate.<br /><br />absolutely NOTHING.GabbyDnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17839575.post-1605925992779107552012-07-28T13:18:27.103+08:002012-07-28T13:18:27.103+08:00Poor comprehension, Gabby D. Chart 1 says the Arct...Poor comprehension, Gabby D. Chart 1 says the Arctic was warmer in the 30s than the present, so the argument of the AGW camp of "unprecedented warming", no precedent or no prior warming, is wrong. <br /><br />Chart 2 says it's temperature that leads to CO2 concentration. The AGW camp says it's the reverse, that more CO2 leads to more warming, and this again, is slam-dunked by the two studies in that chart.Bienvenido Oplas Jrhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07799756132761366267noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17839575.post-88500124119544194992012-07-27T23:29:13.921+08:002012-07-27T23:29:13.921+08:00Possible but read again the note in their twitter ...Possible but read again the note in their twitter page, "You have been blocked from following this account at the request of the user."<br /><br />Besides, the proponents of man-made warming have the burden of defending it anywhere, anytime considering the large amount of government climate and energy regulations, carbon taxation, climate bureaucracies, climate loans, etc. that have been created and contracted.Bienvenido Oplas Jrhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07799756132761366267noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17839575.post-16962306508810755462012-07-27T21:42:38.831+08:002012-07-27T21:42:38.831+08:00Has you ever occurred to you that perhaps their Tw...Has you ever occurred to you that perhaps their Twitter followers flagged your post as spam or abusive considering the tone of the language that you are using.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17839575.post-52360507685665523742012-07-27T01:09:28.810+08:002012-07-27T01:09:28.810+08:00See the language of the warming religionists. But ...See the language of the warming religionists. But unlike their camp which censor or block unfavorable opinions, all contrary opinions allowed here. So, blurt out more.Bienvenido Oplas Jrhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07799756132761366267noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17839575.post-72852774961918476712012-07-27T00:58:30.500+08:002012-07-27T00:58:30.500+08:00You're being a dick, man. Good luck convincing...You're being a dick, man. Good luck convincing people to believe you.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com