One of the known advocates of a low, flat tax, is former Manila Councilor Greco Belgica. In the 2013 elections, he ran for the Senate. He was not serious in winning of course. He only used the elections to propagandize the flat tax philosophy, which was a good strategy.
In his facebook wall, Greco posted these two entries in his wall a few days ago. These were shared by some of his friends. My comments after these two entries.
------------
My
proposals during the 2013 election and the proposals today.
1. 10% Flat rate tax. vs lower tax
proposals in both houses.
2. Abolition of the Pork Barrel System -
DONE
3. Conversion of the Pdaf to Tuition
Vouchers. - Tuition vouchers are now available for k-12 students.
These ideas comes are principles of a
limited and small government. The same worldview and ideas espoused by our
young heroes through the constitution they have written and fundamentally
carried over by the constitution we still have today. And principles applied by
all free nations and all men who fought for liberty.
Crony-capitalism
and a Centralized System of Government (GDP & POVERTY)
Crony-capitalism are products of a
centralized system of government – a system
communism and socialism espouses and most governments today share,
including the Philippine government.
During the time of President Marcos,
Cronies enjoyed all power, resources and opportunities from 1 man holding all
powers of governments. Today, Cronies
enjoy the same privileges from 1 and the same government, however held by 2M
bureaucrats and elected officials.
Re-distributing wealth, power and
opportunities to the few at the expense of the rest through government laws and
regulations.
GDP growth rates are useless economic
indicators. The economy measured as a
whole is a useless indicator of economic strength. It measures collectively as a whole and has
nothing to do with individuals and family needs. People are at the center of all economic
activities not government. In a free and
christian society, government has nothing to do with business. People create governments. Governments does not make a people.
A nation exist primarily as individuals
and families seek to come together and bind themselves through a constitution
to preserve themselves and co-exist.
Primarily as individuals and as a family, secondarily as a country. The centralized view of society espoused by
communism comes from the same world view GDP measures society. There is no freedom in communism while there
is no poverty with liberty. GDP as
standard for economic strength is false.
That explains why while government continues to say GDP is growing,
poverty continues to grow as well.
Correct economic standards must view the
economy from the standpoint of the home and individuals. The true standard are the extent resource –
LAND & CAPITAL – are made available to FAMILIES and INDIVIDUALS and NOT
Governments, Multinational companies and mega corporations. The extent of a centralized power and system
of government is proportionate to the extent of CRONYISM of a country.
Economics can not be measured or treated
as a whole. It is measured through the
homes. The extent of the availability of
resources (LAND & CAPITAL) to individuals and families and the extent of
liberty one enjoys to trade and pursue his dreams and happiness without threats
of confiscation and the strangling arms of government regulations against life and property and private properties.
-------------
My comments:
Many good points like distrust of big government,
socialism and communism, emphasis on individual liberty. And the need for a
flat tax, 10 percent single rate. This is a brilliant proposal, not original of
course as there are several countries in
the world now which have 10 percent flat income tax rate, both for individuals
and corporations, like Georgia, Russia.
I voted for Greco in the 2013 election
mainly because I could not fill up the 12 Senatorial slots and I believe in the
low, flat tax proposal. I think I filled only about six names in the ballot,
Belgica included.
But he has a few wrong points above like
"GDP growth rates are useless economic indicators" without
identifying alternative measurements of growth, micro or macro.
One alternative to GDP growth is
electricity consumption growth. When people are well off, they tend to have
more gadgets and appliances, more air-con rooms, more lights, resulting in high
electricity consumption. If they are poor, they cut spending on electricity.
But Greco himself did not identify any alternative measurement.
A friend commented that “It's more
important to look at the change in the rate of employment rather than that of
GDP, in determining economic growth and the degree to which such productivity
is enjoyed. Nonoy's electricity suggestion might not work if more efficient
means of production actually bring down electricity usage.”
A change to employment rate as
measurement of economic strength is itself tricky and not reliable, for these
reasons.
One, definition of underemployment. Someone
working 10-12 hours a day and still "wanting additional work" is
considered as underemployed. Or someone already earning P100k a month but
"wanting additional work" because he wants to earn P130k a month is
also considered as underemployed.
Two, definition of unemployment. Someone
who has been offered P80k a month but refuses it because he is waiting for a
possible job call that will pay him P100k a month is considered unemployed if
an NSO surveyor happened to ask him that day.
Three, reference period. It is possible
to have a good overall business environment for 3 months but the labor force
survey, conducted for only 1 or 2 days per quarter, was done on a bad day, and
so employment data is bad. Or the business environment for that quarter is
generally bad, but the survey was done on a rather good day, so employment data
is good.
Thus, using employment figures, themselves
are aggregates, as replacement for GDP growth figures is even more
questionable.
For people with anti-GDP angsts like
Greco, here are a few questions: If you wish to know how much was the growth
(or lack of growth) of agri, in particular rice, corn, sugarcane, poultry,
fishery, etc., how do you go about it? If you wish to know how much growth (or lack of it) occurred
in the services sector, especially in tourism, buses, retail shops, etc., how
do you go about it?
I think their answer would be simple,
the sound of silence. Currently, these sectors and sub-sectors are being
measured. The measurement is not exact of course, it can never be perfect, but
the estimates are there, including how much contribution from the informal
sector.
------------
See also:Tax Cut 14: APTU Meeting in Bangkok, March 1-2, January 22, 2013
Tax Cut 15: Some Resistance to Reducing Personal Income Tax, May 04, 2013
Tax Cut 16: Conserving Fishery Resources by Taxing Demersal Fish Catch?, May 27, 2013
Tax Cut 17: BIR vs. Physicians, March 06, 2014
Abolish Income Tax 8. From low flat tax to zero income tax, September 30, 2011
Abolish Income Tax 9: Tax Revolt Against Government Corruption, September 29, 2013
Hi Noy,
ReplyDeleteThanks for the write up. But my answer to your observation was on the 2nd to the last paragraph. Here it is.
"Correct economic standards must view the economy from the standpoint of the home and individuals. The true standard are the extent resource – LAND & CAPITAL – are made available to FAMILIES and INDIVIDUALS and NOT Governments, Multinational companies and mega corporations. The extent of a centralized power and system of government is proportionate to the extent of CRONYISM of a country."
Economic standards should be viewed in the extent a family has access to resources - LAND & CAPITAL".
GDP views economy as a whole thats why I said it is a useless indicator. Economics is rightly viewed by family resources and capabilities. God bless.
and BTW, I really wanted to win last election to pursue my advocacy. - in fact i went all around the country.
ReplyDeleteThanks for your support.
Thanks Greco. If you are serious in winning the elections to advance the low, flat tax and other free market policies, you should build alliances built around these few issues. It will be a platform-based campaign with clear and explicit goals, unlike the shoot for the moon "good governance" campaign which is the platform of all politicians including the most corrupt. I and other free marketers here will be joining that alliance if you build one.
ReplyDelete