“food production is
not limited by available land…it depends upon demand. If demand rises, so does
food production. Hunger, malnourishment, and starvation are not due to a lack
of food. They are almost always due to governmental policies which hinder
farming or hinder the prosperity needed to import food….”
A world of rising... famine, or abundance? There is more
food per capita now, and more in the future. The prophets of doom and alarmism may consider findinng other more useful jobs. Also from Dr. Spencer, March 18th, 2014.
“Here in the U.S,
as well as globally, grain production as well as yields (in bushels per acre)
have been on an upward linear trend for at least 50 years, primarily due to
improvements in varieties (e.g. with greater drought tolerance) and growing
practices.”
Another chart, by regions and continents, 2000-2009.
Land productivity is agricultural gross production per
hectare of agri land. Labor productivity is agricultural gross production per
economically active person in agriculture.
In Asia, they are steadily rising except in Afghanistan,
Bhutan and North Korea.
Data is from Table 6, Global Food Policy Report
2014-2015, by the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
The figures are even more impressive, much larger in some
MidEast countries than those in Asia proper. Note the numbers for Israel,
Egypt, Bahrain and Lebanon.
same source above.
Some reports and articles.
(1) "Journalists know that alarmism attracts readers. An
article in the British newspaper the Independent titled, “Have we reached ‘peak
food’? Shortages loom as global production rates slow” claimed humanity will
soon face mass starvation.
Just as Paul Ehrlich’s 1968 bestseller The Population
Bomb predicted that millions would die due to food shortages in the 1970s and
1980s, the article in 2015 tries to capture readers’ interest through unfounded
fear. Let’s take a look at the actual state of global food production."
May 26, 2015. http://fee.org/.../capitalism-defused-the-population-bomb
(2) "For the first time, the world is eating more fish
from farms than from the open sea, spurring billions of dollars of takeovers as
one of the largest food companies seeks to capitalize on rising demand.
Fish consumption is growing at a faster pace than beef,
pork and poultry, driven by an expanding, increasingly prosperous global
population that recognizes the health benefits of eating seafood. Demand is
forecast by United Nations to outstrip supply in coming years. Wild fish aren’t
going to fill the gap, and that leaves farming in lakes and coastal waters --
also known as aquaculture -- to make up the shortfall." http://www.bloomberg.com/.../hungry-fish-farms-lure...
(3) "The future of food is not bleak, as Liu suggests
and mainstream media agrees, the future of food looks fantastic. Since the
1970s American farmers, who embrace science more than any in the world, have
grown more food on less land in a way 1970s projections believed was only
science-fiction. If Europe and the
developing world embraced science the way American agriculture does, not only
could we grow the same food we have right now, we could let farmland equivalent
to the entire region of Amazonia go back to nature and not lose a single
carrot." http://www.science20.com/science_20/no_we_have_not_reached_peak_food-152734
(4) "Between 1990–92 and 2014–16, despite a global population
increase of 35% (or 1.9 billion), the population suffering from chronic hunger
declined by 216 million. Consequently malnutrition also declined. Since
reductions in hunger and malnutrition are the first steps to better public
health, age-adjusted mortality rates have declined and life expectancy has
increased." -- Indur Goklany, July 6, 2015, http://wattsupwiththat.com/2015/07/06/have-fossil-fuels-diminished-the-worlds-sustainability-and-resilience/
(5) From human progress. I chose the four most populous countries in Asia -- China, India, Indonesia and Bangladesh. http://humanprogress.org/.../Bangla.../China/India/Indonesia
Yes, we have entered the period of rising productivity and prosperity. Governments and NGOs of alarmism should step back from more regulations and interventions in various innovations in food production, storage, marketing and distribution. Innovation and competition among players, big and small, plus civil society volunteerism can address problems in distribution to the most vulnerable and poorest sections of the population.
-----------
See also:
Agri Econ 18: Israel's Modern, High Tech Farming, March 17, 2015
Agri Econ 19: Charcoal Supply and Demand, May 01, 2015
Agri Econ 20, On NFA-BOC Campaign for Expensive Rice, May 19, 2015
Agri Econ 21, Rice protectionism as poverty-maximizing policy, September 25, 2015GM crops and rising population, March 10, 2011
Pilipinas Forum 4: GMOs are good, August 31, 2011
GMOs, Greenpeace and Public Health, January 15, 2014
No comments:
Post a Comment