Anthropogenic or "man-made" climate change (CC)
hypothesis is actually 5% climate science and 95% political science. A
realistic view is that CC is natural (ie, 'nature-made') and cyclical
(warming-cooling-warming-cooling...). So a change in political leadership of
one of the major players will significantly increase the % share of real
climate science and reduce the share of political science.
Some big news reports a day after Donald Trump was elected as the next US President.
"While vowing to “cancel” the international Paris
climate accord Obama championed, Trump would also rearrange domestic energy and
environmental priorities. He wants to open up federal lands to oil and gas
drilling and coal mining. He wants to eliminate regulations he calls needless.
He would scrap proposed regulations for tighter methane controls on domestic
drillers. And he wants to shrink the role of the Environmental Protection
Agency to a mostly advisory one and pull back the Clean Power Plan, Obama’s
proposed plan to push utilities toward lower carbon emissions." https://www.washingtonpost.com/.../trump-victory.../
"Global markets were thrown into disarray as results
from the U.S. poured in. Wind turbine makers led the biggest declines in five
months. Vestas Wind Systems A/S dropped 9.7 percent Wednesday after dropping
8.1 percent Tuesday when management announced a bleaker outlook for next
year." http://www.bloomberg.com/.../trump-victory-seen...
"Shares in Vestas Wind Systems A/S plunged after
U.S. voters unexpectedly propelled Republican nominee Donald Trump to the
presidency, sparking concern that the renewable- energy industry will face
future political headwinds.
The world’s biggest maker of wind turbines fell as much
as 14 percent and traded 6.6 percent lower at 440.10 kroner as of 12:50 p.m. in
Copenhagen. Stock of the Danish company already lost ground last week after
U.S. polls tightened, bringing this year’s declines to about 10 percent." http://www.bloomberg.com/.../vestas-sinks-as-trump...
"On climate change, abandoning the Paris Treaty
would be primarily of symbolic importance, since implementation has always been
the biggest obstacle. China’s announcement of a 19% increase in coal capacity
over the next five years demonstrates just how little committed many of the
signers are. Possibly, President Trump will try to reduce federal support for
renewables, but since that would cause the loss of many jobs and Congress has
already extended the Production Tax Credit for five years, it’s not clear that
much will be done, or at least not very quickly." http://www.forbes.com/.../what-will-president-trump.../...
Lord Christopher Monckton of Brenchley (UK) wrote:
1. U.S. withdrawal from the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, from the Paris climate agreement and from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
2. Termination, on environmental and humanitarian grounds, of all Federal Government payments to foreign entities in connection with climate change... https://wattsupwiththat.com/.../in-light-of-recent.../
"Many years ago, Lord Monckton predicted America
would be nation to lead the world to freedom from the anti-humanist greed of
the green movement. Lord Monckton’s prediction has now come to pass.
In my native Australia, in Europe, across the world, in
the bleak halls of the United Nations, the climate elite were gathering for one
final great push to claim the future. Their plans are now in ruins." https://wattsupwiththat.com/.../09/the-end-of-the-green-age/
From Marc Morano: “Climate sanity has been restored to
the U.S. No longer do we have to hear otherwise intelligent people in charge in
DC blather on about how UN treaties or EPA regulations will control the Earth’s
temperature or storminess." http://www.climatedepot.com/.../trump-wins-u-s.../
"The US
president-elect "cannot prevent the implementation" of the landmark
Paris pact, inked in the French capital last December, said Segolene Royal,
France's environment minister and outgoing head of the UN climate forum.
"As I speak,
103 countries representing 70 percent of (greenhouse gas) emissions have
ratified it, and he cannot -- contrary to his assertions -- undo the Paris
Agreement," she told French radio station RTL." https://www.yahoo.com/.../climate-diplomats-push-back...
Their big problem is that hundreds of those "planet
saviours" from developing countries, NGOs, etc were paid for by US
taxpayers, courtesy of Pres. Obama's embrace of climate alarmism movement.
"Paris accord
in limbo?
As for the Paris
Climate Agreement, Trump can either ignore it or withdraw from further climate
talks. Since Obama bypassed congress by calling it an accord—a treaty requires
approval by the Senate—Trump could repeal the executive order Obama used to
implement the agreement." http://us.blastingnews.com/.../here-s-what-a-trump...
"The bigger concerns, climate researchers, strategists and activists say, is if Trump prevents the U.S. from meeting its target of reducing its greenhouse gas emissions or keeps the country from taking more ambitious climate action. The U.S. has promised to reduce emissions 26-28 percent by 2025 compared to 2005 levels, a goal many say may be within reach simply based on the market forces already pushing out older coal plants in favor of natural gas." https://insideclimatenews.org/.../marrakech-morocco...
"SEVENTH, cancel billions in payments to U.N. climate
change programs and use the money to fix America's water and environmental
infrastructure."
"Seven actions to protect American workers:
....
★ FIFTH, I will lift the restrictions on the production of
$50 trillion dollars’ worth of job-producing American
energy reserves, including shale, oil, natural gas and clean coal.
★ SIXTH, lift the Obama-Clinton roadblocks and allow vital
energy infrastructure projects, like the Keystone Pipeline, to move forward.
★ SEVENTH, cancel billions in payments to U.N. climate
change programs and use the money to fi x America’s
water and environmental infrastructure."
The climate alarmism movement with the goal of more UN, more government, more carbon taxation, more renewables cronyism, more and endless global climate junkets, more climate loans, would be reeling now because the "party might be over soon."
More real climate science, less political science. More market in science debates, less government interventions in debate.
-------------
Energy 78, AEMO on the S. Australia blackout last Sept. 28, October 13, 2016
Energy 79, Germany Energiewende's €520 Billion Cost By 2025, October 17, 2016
Energy 80, Power outages in 2010, October 21, 2016
Spencer, Watts, Gosselin and Bastardi on Clinton vs. Trump, Elections 2016, November 05, 2016
No comments:
Post a Comment