Last Monday on my way to a meeting in Solaire Hotel, I
passed by a group of rallyists going to the Senate. Mostly NFA employees, they oppose rice tariffication (conversion of quantitative restrictions, QRs into tariff), oppose removing NFA importation monopoly, in short they demand more rice protectionism,
SB 1998 or the rice tariffication bill intends to amend RA 8178, Agricultural Tariffication Act, implement a 35%
duty or tariff on imported rice from the ASEAN, 50% tariff for rice imports from non-ASEAN
countries. It will also remove NFA authority to monopolize or regulate the importation of rice and issue import licenses for the private sector.
This illustration I got from the web, perhaps DOF made this.
This illustration I got from the web, perhaps DOF made this.
Senate committee on agriculture Chair is Sen. Cynthia A. Villar. SB 1998 will also create the Rice
Competitiveness Enhancement Fund, P10
billion initial appropriation, succeeding years funding will come from the tariff
revenues for rice importation, about P8 B/year.
On plans that government should subsidize high value crops for small rice farmers, I think a better option is for government to remove oil taxes. PH agri is becoming more mechanized. From hand tractors to bigger tractors, from manual to machine harvesters. Higher oil taxes means higher cost of farming.
-------------
See also:
Agri Econ 23, Why forever Agrarian Reform should stop, March 09, 2016
Agri Econ 24, Greenpeace voodoo science vs GMOs, July 07, 2016
Agri Econ 25, On DA's plan for solar irrigation, February 06, 2017
Agri Econ 26, Biotech products, July 22, 2018
Agri Econ 25, On DA's plan for solar irrigation, February 06, 2017
Agri Econ 26, Biotech products, July 22, 2018
Totally agree with you. Instead of passing the rice tariffication law vetoing the train law which raises oil prices would greatly help in lowering prices of all consumer goods.
ReplyDelete