The rapid pace of economic growth in East Asia over the
past two to three decades coincided with, or was facilitated by, high energy
capacity largely coming from coal power plants.
This is shown by the numbers below covering two decades.
Electricity generation and solar power consumption are expressed in terawatt
hours (TWh, 1 TW = 1 million MW), coal consumption is expressed in million tons
oil equivalent (mtoe), and GDP size is valued at Purchasing Power Parity (PPP).
The table on the right shows the following:
1. The Philippines has a small electricity production,
only 83 TWh in 2015 or just one-half (1/2) that of Vietnam and Thailand and
only one-third (1/3) that of Indonesia. This is a reflection of its low
installed power capacity relative to its neighbors.
2. China and Vietnam have significantly expanded their
electricity production in the last two decades by nearly 500% and 1,000%,
respectively. This coincided with, or significantly contributed to, their high
GDP expansion of 769% and 426% respectively for the same period. China has a
very high level of coal use, 1,920 mtoe in 2015 while Vietnam has a very high %
expansion of coal use, 616% in just two decades.
3. Of the 12 Asian economies listed, only three — Japan,
Thailand and Hong Kong — did not experience 200+% expansion or quadrupling of
GDP size after two decades. They are also the three economies plus Pakistan,
that did not experience high expansion in electricity generation and coal use.
4. The eight other Asian economies have benefited from
higher electricity generation, higher coal use, and coincided with or
facilitated higher GDP size expansion in just two decades.
5. Solar power consumption in Asia remains very small.
Less than 0.05 TWh in 2015 for six of the 12 economies — Vietnam, Hong Kong,
Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore and Thailand. Thus, statements that many Asian
economies have (a) significantly embraced new renewables like solar, and (b)
their use of coal power is declining as they shift towards more solar and wind
power – are preposterous.
During the BusinessWorld Economic Forum last July 12,
2016, the subject of Philippines’ power and energy policies was mentioned
several times by different speakers.
In his keynote speech, First Pacific Co. Ltd. managing
director, said that “The recent heightened interest in renewables is
understandable. But let me say this: for now, renewables cost more than
conventional power, which means higher power prices. There’s a cost to
protecting our environment — no such thing as free lunch.” He added that we are
heading towards sufficient power capacity and majority of these power plants
are coal.
DoF Secretary Carlos Dominguez III partly mentioned the
importance of a realistic energy mix that will not burden the consumers with
high electricity prices.
In the panel on Disruption, Solar Philippines’ President
Leandro Leviste argued that “solar is now cheaper than coal.” He added that
batteries to stabilize solar output that currently costs an additional P2.50
per kWh to solar power can significantly drop by one-half by 2020. Still, he
argued, that solar + battery prices, solar can replace all gas, oil, and diesel
in the Philippines.
In the panel on Infrastructure Capacity, Eric Francia,
President & CEO of Ayala Corporation Energy Holdings, Inc. showed one slide
where the Philippines’ power capacity 2014 was only 15.6 GW vs. Vietnam’s 40+
GW.
Finally, in the same panel on Capacity, Erramon Aboitiz,
President & CEO of Aboitiz Equity Ventures, Inc. (AEVI) said that the
Electric Power Industry Reform Act of 2001 (EPIRA, RA 9136) is working. It
stopped the financial drain of government with heavy NPC monopoly losses and
debts, attracted investments from the private sector and competition has driven
down power rates. He rightfully argued that in deciding the energy mix,
affordability to consumers and stability of power supply should be a priority
for the government. The open access and retail competition provision give
customers the power of choice.
There are several ways that expensive solar energy will
burden the consumers in the coming years. One, the high feed in tariff (FiT) of
P8.69/kWh in 2015, that becomes P9.69/kWh in 2016, that will become roughly
P10.70 by 2017, and further rise in 2018 and beyond as indexation to inflation
rate and other factors are inserted. Two, this ever-rising solar price is
assured for 20 years for each FiT-eligible solar company. Three, even consumers
in Mindanao who are not connected to the Visayas-Luzon grids and not part of
WESM energy trading are forced to pay this expensive FiT. Four, the priority or
mandatory dispatch into the grid even if cheaper sources like coal that can be
sold at marginal price of only P1 to P1.50/kWh during off-peak demand hours and
days are available. And five, the impending renewable portfolio standard (RPS)
will force, coerce and arm-twist many or all the distribution utilities (DUs)
in the country to buy a minimum percentage from expensive renewables, the
additional cost will be passed on to the consumers.
The government should step out of energy rationing and
cronyism. Consumers should be given the freedom to choose, to buy from cheaper
energy and avoid expensive electricity. Current legislation via the RE law of
2008 (RA 9513) that institutionalizes energy cronyism should be amended or
abolished. This is one policy measure that President Duterte and DoE Secretary
Cusi can consider in the next six years.
Bienvenido S. Oplas, Jr. is the head of Minimal
Government Thinkers and a SEANET Fellow.
-------------See also:
BWorld 66, Renewable portfolio standard and electricity prices, June 26, 2016
BWorld 70, Wind power firms corner billions of FIT money, July 09, 2016
BWorld 73, Transco and the big beneficiaries of feed in tariff, July 27, 2016
BWorld 74, Pres. Duterte's anti-corruption programs and Transparency Intl., July 30, 2016
BWorld 75, How to profit from urban congestion, July 30, 2016
No comments:
Post a Comment