Last Tuesday, September 10, I attended the lecture of Martin Jacques, afternoon of Day 1 of Mining Philippines Conference at Sofitel Philippine Plaza Hotel. Martin is a British academic who for many years now sound and speak like China Ministry of Foreign Affairs' spokesman and #1 propagandist.
I first heard Martin in 2012 when he spoke in Manila. That time I was less observant of CN and its activities in the region and the world. Second time I heard him was last May at the Jeju Forum for Peace and Prosperity, S. Korea. I was not impressed of him. So I didn't want to attend his lecture at Sofitel, will not waste my money on him (perhaps he should pay me so that I will listen to him :-)). Then a friend secured a ticket for me (ticket price is P7,500, roughly $150) with a soft arrangement that I would challenge Martin in the open forum, I agreed, that's why I attended his lecture.
And this is the main speaker.
See his book (2012) -- when CN rules the world... hehehe. I took this photo at the registration table that afternoon.
And he kept using PPP (purchasing power parity) value of GDP where CN's is larger than the US'. Never showed any nominal values of GDP.
So during the open forum, I made these comments:
I first heard Martin in 2012 when he spoke in Manila. That time I was less observant of CN and its activities in the region and the world. Second time I heard him was last May at the Jeju Forum for Peace and Prosperity, S. Korea. I was not impressed of him. So I didn't want to attend his lecture at Sofitel, will not waste my money on him (perhaps he should pay me so that I will listen to him :-)). Then a friend secured a ticket for me (ticket price is P7,500, roughly $150) with a soft arrangement that I would challenge Martin in the open forum, I agreed, that's why I attended his lecture.
For me, the three Filipino reactors were more quotable, more sensible, than the
speaker. Images I got from Chamber of Mines of the PH (COMP) facebook page.
And this is the main speaker.
See his book (2012) -- when CN rules the world... hehehe. I took this photo at the registration table that afternoon.
And he kept using PPP (purchasing power parity) value of GDP where CN's is larger than the US'. Never showed any nominal values of GDP.
So during the open forum, I made these comments:
1. It is deceptive to use only PPP values of GDP size and not show nominal GDP sizes. In 2018, US GDP
size was $20.5 trillion, CN $13.4 T, JP $5 T, so that US econ is larger than CN
+ JP economies combined.
2. Stockmarket capitalization 2018, US $30.4 trillion, CN
$6.3 T, JP $5.3 T... so CN's is small, even if it's 2nd biggest in the world,
compared to US.
3. Technology, the US Chamber of Commerce estimated
global physical counterfeiting 2016, total $461 B, of which 72% came from CN.
So CN development in technology is partly or largely due to cheating and stealing of IPR.
4. On CN having "peaceful" history, not
colonized any country in the past, because CN is busy bullying and killing its
own people, thousands killed during Tiananmen massacre (1989), during the
Cultural Revolution of Mao and his gang.
(Background data for my first 3 comments, below:)
1. GDP size nominal values, 2018. See https://www.bworldonline.com/why-is-philippines-gdp-growth-decelerating/)
2. Stock market capitalization, see https://www.theglobaleconomy.com/rankings/stock_market_capitalization_dollars/
3. IPR stealing, counterfeits, see https://www.bworldonline.com/fire-innovation-and-stealing-of-innovation/
Martin responded. He was defensive that I raised using nominal GDP, saying
that PPP values of GDP is more useful.
Realllly?
Look -- when people use comparative data for exports and
imports, foreign investments, remittances, tourism revenues, stockmarket
capitalization, military spending, etc -- all are expressed in nominal
values, not PPP values. So to be consistent, we should always show nominal GDP.
Because one cannot compare say, exports (X/GDP) ratio, Investments/GDP, Savings/GDP, etc
if the numerator is nominal while denominator is PPP value. One would look
like an idiot moron,
Using nominal GDP sizes would crash his narrative, that
CN is the rising and bigger power while the US is the declining, smaller power. Martin is dishonest, deceptive. Similar with Xi Jinping and the CN communist party
leaders.
----------------
See also:
China Watch 36, Manila kowtows to Beijing, July 02, 2019
China Watch 38, China Army to attack HK protesters? August 13, 2019
fake taxi porno
ReplyDeletedoeda porno
kızlık bozma
konulu porno film izle