* This is my article in BusinessWorld on June 30, 2017.
See also:
BWorld 138, PPP vs ODA, Part 2, June 21, 2017
BWorld 139, State central planning vs household decentralized planning, June 22, 2017
BWorld 140, Mineral rent and taxation, June 23, 2017
BWorld 141, Reducing system loss, Part 2, June 30, 2017
This is a continuation of two earlier pieces I wrote
about that compared two funding schemes of government infrastructure projects
in the Philippines -- through public-private partnership and official
development assistance.
In this vein, I wish to correct the numbers I previously
cited in my second piece, entitled “PPP vs. ODA: Part 2.” I wrote that “Vaughn
Montes cited the big contrast between ODA-funded SCTEx and the PPP-funded
TPLEx. SCTEx... cost nearly twice at $32.8 billion vs. the approved budget of
$18.7 billion or P341 million per kilometer. TPLEx cost only P61 million per
kilometer.”
Recently, Dr. Bong Montes sent me his presentation during
a Management Association of the Philippines (MAP) meeting. The correct numbers
about SCTEx are: Cost overruns are from P18.7B to P32.8B; Cost per kilometer is
P349M vs. TPLEx P274M. Thanks for this, Bong.
The same presentation indicated a summary of the
delineation of risks and values between Public Private Partnership (PPP)
funding and government funding (see Table 1).
The main beef of PPP project funding therefore is the
transfer of significant risks to the private sector. The shared risks for both
private and government are bankability and force majeure.
The “hybrid PPP” plan of Dutertenomics is to award the
construction of many big infrastructure projects via foreign aid or Official
Development Assistance (ODA) mostly from China, or the annual General
Appropriations Act (GAA), then invite local private operators later for the
operation and maintenance (O&M).
This plan will invite big current and future
controversies for the following reasons.
One, private O&M operators will not take over a
facility that they did not design and construct without prior intensive due
diligence. If project quality is poor and thus O&M will be high, then
bidders will demand high prices for the O&M. The government-contracted
construction company (from China) may have undercut the design and quality to
maximize profit and potential kickbacks and leave the headache of high
maintenance costs to the separate O&M operator/s.
The most optimal scheme is a straight, integrated PPP
funding from design and construction to O&M. The private party mobilizes
its internal financial muscle and borrows to fund capex, and make sure that
construction is of high quality so that O&M will be lower. As a result, the
public and the taxpayers benefit, which also means a lower tax burden to pay
for the project cost. Moreover, frequent users of the facility will pay every
time they use it and taxpayers from far away provinces and regions who seldom
or do not even benefit from it will not be burdened.
Two, Dutertenomics’ sudden pivot to China ODA is highly
anomalous because China is not exactly a good source of foreign aid even in the
recent past. Its share in total ODA in 2014 and 2015 (latest data available
from NEDA) is miniscule, only $123M out of total $30.08 billion (see Table 2).
Only ODA with at least $70M in two years are included
here. Other sources of ODA at smaller amount are Austria, Spain, Norway, New
Zealand.
Three, PPP projects are generally the fastest way to do
things compared to ODA funding, especially China ODA. Project development to
groundbreaking takes 27 months through the PPP, 37 months through Korean ODA,
38 months through Japanese government funding, and 40 months on Chinese aid.
The most famous tollway in the Philippines, the North
Luzon Expressway (NLEx) was built via World Bank ODA in the 1970s. O&M is
private, currently the Manila North Tollways Corp. (MNTC). The independent
design checker and certification engineer on its rehabilitation is Norconsult
Philippines, probably the first Norwegian company to do business in the country
since the ’70s. NLEx toll fee of around P2.50/kilometer from Sta. Ines to
Balintawak is the lowest among the many tollways in the country.
-------------
See also:
BWorld 138, PPP vs ODA, Part 2, June 21, 2017
BWorld 139, State central planning vs household decentralized planning, June 22, 2017
BWorld 140, Mineral rent and taxation, June 23, 2017
BWorld 141, Reducing system loss, Part 2, June 30, 2017
No comments:
Post a Comment