Showing posts with label James Hansen. Show all posts
Showing posts with label James Hansen. Show all posts

Tuesday, August 11, 2015

Climate Tricks 44, Scary predictions in 2009

We should be scared, very scared, very worried, of "man-made" warming and climate change. Hence, we should send more money to governments, the UN, Al Gore, WWF,Greenpeace, other planet saviours. We should accept more government environmental regulations, taxation, energy cronyism, and they will save the planet for us. 

Below are predictions by some noted climate crusaders. Links and screen shots of headlines are given for verification. Enjoy. Err, be worried. :-) 
---------

On January 2009 (6 1/2 years ago), top climate alarmist US scientist James Hansen said we should have "global flooding, widespread species loss... collapse of ice sheets..." Many of us should have drowned or been mutilated, not today but twi years ago. Very bright, precise, prediction.

Also 6 years ago, October 2009, the WWF (and its planet saviours in the PH like Lory Tan, Yeb Sano, Vince Perez, etc.) said the "point of no return" was last year, not this year or next year. Very bright, precise prediction. http://www.abc.net.au/.../five-years-to-save.../1108482

And also 6 years ago, March 2009, Prince Charles said ("man-made") global warming has already reached a defining moment. Very bright, precise prediction. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/.../Global-warming-has-reached...


July 2009 or 74 months ago, Prince Charles made this bright, bold prediction. We shd be very scared, very worried, only 22 months left... and capitalism and consumerism will kill us. http://www.independent.co.uk/.../just-96-months-to-save...

Former UK PM Gordon Brown beat all of them in giving clear, explicit warning. Only 50 days or end-2009, 50 days, to save the planet. Very bright prediction. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/8313672.stm

Hoops, this Canadian MP and member of the Green Party, even beat Mr. Gordon Brown. Not 4 years, not 50 days, but only "hours" to save the planet. Prediction made in March 2009. These guys are very bright in climate predictions.  http://www.thestar.com/.../we_have_hours_to_prevent...

Thanks to this great article by Larry Kummer, posted in WUWT 2 days ago,
Six climate headlines from 2009 that tell us something important about the run-up to the 2015 Paris climate conference
------------- 

See also: 

Wednesday, July 18, 2012

Climate Tricks 11: Coal and James Hansen, RE Law and the WWF

Way back in 15 February 2009, the head of NASA GISS (Goddard Institute for Space Studies), Dr. James Hansen, proclaimed these scary scenarios:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/feb/15/james-hansen-power-plants-coal


A year ago, I wrote to Gordon Brown...
 causing more warming. As species are exterminated by shifting climate zones, ecosystems can collapse, destroying more species....


Our planet is in peril. If we do not change course, we'll hand our children a situation that is out of their control. One ecological collapse will lead to another, in amplifying feedbacks.


practically all of the glaciers could be gone within 50 years - if carbon dioxide continues to increase at current rates. Coral reefs, harbouring a quarter of ocean species, are threatened...


Clearly, if we burn all fossil fuels, we will destroy the planet we know. Carbon dioxide would increase to 500 ppm or more. We would set the planet on a course to the ice-free state, with sea level 75 metres higher....


Coal is not only the largest fossil fuel reservoir of carbon dioxide, it is the dirtiest fuel. Coal is polluting the world's oceans and streams with mercury, arsenic and other dangerous chemicals. The dirtiest trick that governments play on their citizens is the pretence that they are working on "clean coal" or that they will build power plants that are "capture-ready" in case technology is ever developed to capture all pollutants.


The trains carrying coal to power plants are death trains. Coal-fired power plants are factories of death....

Can one believe that?
* coal is the single biggest threat to civilization
* climate nearing tipping points, destruction of more species
* planet in peril, ecological collapse will lead to another
* all the glaciers could be gone in 50 years (by 2059)
* sea level 75 meters higher (about 25 storeys high building, gasp!)
* death trains, coal power plants are factories of death.

Wow, one wonders if it was an objective scientist or an environmental priest who wrote that.

Wednesday, April 11, 2012

Climate Tricks 6: Using NASA for Political Science

The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) of the US government is the most high profile agency in space science research. Like putting men on the moon as early as the late 60s, sending very powerful space telescopes to study the endless universe.

With anthropogenic global warming (AGW) scam and the heavy political science masquerading as climate science involved to keep propping it, NASA was later dragged into it, especially the Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) headed by top warming scientist and activist, Dr. James Hansen.

Before, only a few former NASA officials and space walkers like Harrison "Jack" Schmitt have come out openly to criticize the corrupted science employed in the AGW drama. Now, 49 other former NASA officials and astronauts have come out. Their language is really damning to the NASA and GISS leadership. See their letter below.

The letter was posted in many science blogs and websites, and in some mainstream media outlets yesterday and today. I am listing at least four of them here.

The large-scale corruption by the United Nations and many national governments around the world about AGW, the treachery, deception and rent-seeking behavior of many environmental NGOs like WWF and Greenpeace, are further exposed. Enjoy reading.
----------


(1) from WUWT,
Hansen and Schmidt of NASA GISS under fire for climate stance: Engineers, scientists, astronauts ask NASA administration to look at empirical evidence rather than climate models
(2) from NTZ,
50 Top Astronauts, Scientists, Engineers Sign Letter Claiming Extremist GISS Is Turning NASA Into A Laughing Stock!
Climate Rebellion Rocks NASA
http://thegwpf.org/science-news/5422-climate-rebellion-rocks-nasa.html

(4) from Real Science,
Hansen Slammed By Top NASA Scientists/Engineers/Astronauts
Posted on  by Steven Goddard
-----------

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Contact: Blanquita Cullum 703-307-9510 bqview at mac.com
Joint letter to NASA Administrator blasts agency’s policy of ignoring empirical evidence
HOUSTON, TX – April 10, 2012.
49 former NASA scientists and astronauts sent a letter to NASA Administrator Charles Bolden last week admonishing the agency for it’s role in advocating a high degree of certainty that man-made CO2 is a major cause of climate change while neglecting empirical evidence that calls the theory into question.
The group, which includes seven Apollo astronauts and two former directors of NASA’s Johnson Space Center in Houston, are dismayed over the failure of NASA, and specifically the Goddard Institute For Space Studies (GISS), to make an objective assessment of all available scientific data on climate change. They charge that NASA is relying too heavily on complex climate models that have proven scientifically inadequate in predicting climate only one or two decades in advance.
H. Leighton Steward, chairman of the non-profit Plants Need CO2, noted that many of the former NASA scientists harbored doubts about the significance of the C02-climate change theory and have concerns over NASA’s advocacy on the issue. While making presentations in late 2011 to many of the signatories of the letter, Steward realized that the NASA scientists should make their concerns known to NASA and the GISS.
“These American heroes – the astronauts that took to space and the scientists and engineers that put them there – are simply stating their concern over NASA’s extreme advocacy for an unproven theory,” said Leighton Steward. “There’s a concern that if it turns out that CO2 is not a major cause of climate change, NASA will have put the reputation of NASA, NASA’s current and former employees, and even the very reputation of science itself at risk of public ridicule and distrust.”
Select excerpts from the letter: 
  • “The unbridled advocacy of CO2 being the major cause of climate change is unbecoming of NASA’s history of making an objective assessment of all available scientific data prior to making decisions or public statements.”
  • “We believe the claims by NASA and GISS, that man-made carbon dioxide is having a catastrophic impact on global climate change are not substantiated.”
  • “We request that NASA refrain from including unproven and unsupported remarks in its future releases and websites on this subject.”
The full text of the letter:
March 28, 2012
The Honorable Charles Bolden, Jr.
NASA Administrator
NASA Headquarters
Washington, D.C. 20546-0001
Dear Charlie,
We, the undersigned, respectfully request that NASA and the Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) refrain from including unproven remarks in public releases and websites. We believe the claims by NASA and GISS, that man-made carbon dioxide is having a catastrophic impact on global climate change are not substantiated, especially when considering thousands of years of empirical data. With hundreds of well-known climate scientists and tens of thousands of other scientists publicly declaring their disbelief in the catastrophic forecasts, coming particularly from the GISS leadership, it is clear that the science is NOT settled.
The unbridled advocacy of CO2 being the major cause of climate change is unbecoming of NASA’s history of making an objective assessment of all available scientific data prior to making decisions or public statements.
As former NASA employees, we feel that NASA’s advocacy of an extreme position, prior to a thorough study of the possible overwhelming impact of natural climate drivers is inappropriate. We request that NASA refrain from including unproven and unsupported remarks in its future releases and websites on this subject. At risk is damage to the exemplary reputation of NASA, NASA’s current or former scientists and employees, and even the reputation of science itself.
For additional information regarding the science behind our concern, we recommend that you contact Harrison Schmitt or Walter Cunningham, or others they can recommend to you.
Thank you for considering this request.
Sincerely,

Sunday, May 22, 2011

Armageddon, crackpots and governments, Part 2

These are among the "scenarios" that would have happened yesterday, the May 21, 2011 "Judgment Day". Or in previous doomsday and Armageddon prophesies.

It should be safe to say that the same imagery will resurface again and again in the future, like the 2012 doomdsday. Some crackpots can be imaginative in painting a scary future and a non-existent past. The important thing for them is that planet Earth will end... soon... or the soonest time possible. They must be watching a lot of zoombie movies and Al Gore fiction documentaries?

These are among the imageries by the man-made warming religion. These will happen just 89 years from now, by 2100. Or 200 years, or 1,000 years from now. The important thing is that this "will" happen. Courtesy of the UN IPCC, FCCC, UNEP, GISS-NASA (James Hansen kingdom), Al Gore, Arnie Schwarze, Leonardo di Caprio, and so on.

Another Armageddon imageries. This time, hitting the world's financial centers New York and London. Wait, the UN headquarters is in NYC. It should be the dark building on the left.

This will happen also in 2100? Or 200 years away? Well, GISS' James Hansen wrote in February 15, 2009: "If we burn all fossil fuels, we will destroy the planet we know. Carbon dioxide would increase to 500 ppm or more. We would set the planet on a course to the ice-free state, with sea level 75 metres higher...." (from The Guardian UK)

75 meters rise in sea level! We should indeed be scared and worried. Be very worried. Thanks to the UN and many governments for reminding us.
----

See related articles:

1. Armageddon, crackpots and governments
2. Global warming hits the Arctic