Sunday, April 05, 2026

PhilStar 85, Economic uncertainty and digital payment infrastructure

Economic uncertainty and digital payment infrastructure


ENERGY, INFRA AND ECONOMICS - Bienvenido Oplas Jr. - The Philippine Star

March 19, 2026 | 12:00am

https://www.philstar.com/business/2026/03/19/2515238/economic-uncertainty-and-digital-payment-infrastructure

 

Energy uncertainty means economic uncertainty. The ongoing war in the Middle East started by the US-Israel against Iran last Feb. 28 led to Iran hitting back at Israel and US military bases or facilities in Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Bahrain, Kuwait, Jordan and Iraq.

 

These are oil-gas producing and exporting countries. Choking of the Strait of Hormuz has worsened the situation. So by-products of crude oil and gas — from gasoline, diesel, LPG, LNG, fertilizers, industrial and petrochemical products —  prices have jumped high.

 

These energy, industrial, agricultural price shocks need to be mitigated somewhere. One such absorbent infrastructure is digital finance. How? Via easier transactions payment, with transparent paper trails done in real time. This reduces cost of financial transactions, people save money and time.

 

Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP) data show that in 2025, digital payments accounted for 72 percent of payments made by individuals. Meaning less cash transactions mostly done by oldies like me who still prefer to pay in cash whenever possible.

 

The Philippines built one of Southeast Asia’s most active digital payments ecosystems in the last decade. Millions of Filipinos now use mobile platforms to send money, pay bills, receive remittances and support small businesses. National platforms like GCash, May, and other local payment systems have integrated into regional platforms like Grab.

 

I often pay my purchases by cash but I also occasionally receive payments or make payments via GCash. It is clear that tens of millions of Filipinos have GCash account doing transactions from petty amount of less than P100 to tens of thousands of pesos including remittances by OFWs. Both volume and scale of transactions are large.

 

Technological innovation was made by the private players themselves but regulatory facilitation while setting safegards for public protection was made by the BSP. That thing QR Ph is good, it introduced interoperable digital payments, standardized QR code across banks and e-wallets covering all from micro-small-medium enterprises (MSMEs).

 

Small retailers are among the biggest beneficiaries. A survey by Packworks found that e-wallet usage among sari-sari stores have increased by 75 percent in the past year, largely driven by growing consumer demand for cashless transactions. Interoperable systems such as QR Ph allow small merchants to accept payments from multiple wallets and banking apps, enabling them to participate more actively in the digital economy.

 

I checked the value and percent changes of M1, the most liquid measure of money supply in an economy. This is money that is immediately available for spending like  physical currency (banknotes and coins) in circulation, demand deposits (checking accounts), and other checkable deposits. There are also M2, M3, M4 but M1 is the narrowest, most liquid money supply.

 

Then I chose large population Asian countries, those with 100 million and more people. Over the past 10 years, 2015 to 2025, even January 2016 to January 2026 for some countries. Here is what I saw.

 

Vietnam M1 from 1.46 trillion dong in 2015 to 4.32 trillion dong in 2025, threefold increase. Indonesia from one trillion rupiah to 3.4 trillion rupiah same period, 3.4 times increase. India from 23.5 trillion rupee to 73.7 trillion rupee, fourfold increase. Pakistan from 9.25 trillion rupee in January 2016 to 36.9 trillion rupee in January 2026, fourfold increase. Philippines from P2.5 trillion in January 2016 to P7.58 trillion in January 2026, threefold increase.

 

So we are at similar level of money supply expansion as Vietnam but lower than Indonesia, India, Pakistan. Japan and South Korea have less than double expansion of M1 over 10 years.

 

The limited expansion of our M1 is another indicator that demand and supply for hard peso cash and checking accounts have lesser appetite now, more people have shifted to digital payment transactions.

 

Digital payments help improve the efficiency of the broader economy by making financial transactions move quicker and safer, more transparent. Businesses operate more smoothly, transactions become easier to track, and more economic activities  enter the formal economy. This is particularly important for MSMEs.

 

There are millions of Filipino workers and professionals in the Middle East, mainly in Saudi Arabia and UAE. I read that GCash has waived certain remittance-related fees to help OFWs send money home more easily amid uncertainty in parts of the Middle East. I also read that PLDT has offered free calls for limited time for Filipinos here calling their folks in the Middle East.

 

Actions like these show how digital financial platforms can respond quickly during geopolitical tensions and uncertainties. These reduce tension and anxieties for Filipinos in both ends of Asia.

 

Meanwhile UAE finance and tourism is badly affected. UAE has six of the top 60 largest and wealthiest sovereign wealth funds (SWFs) in the world with combined assets of some $2.2 trillion, which is 1,000 times larger than our SWF, the Maharlika Investment Corp’s $2 billion assets.

 

I see further outmigration of UAE funds to more stable regions like the ASEAN, and the Philippines has an existing Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (CEPA) with UAE already, the only free trade agreement the Philippines has among Middle East countries.

 

Should that investment flows from UAE to the Philippines start getting larger, digital payments will play a big role not only in projects themselves but also among people.

 

Additional technological innovation by the private players, more regulatory liberalization by the BSP and continued collaboration between the two will contribute to growing trust among millions of Filipino users and foreign investors.

 

Geopolitical uncertainties in the Middle East and other parts of the world will never go away. We can only anticipate those and lay down digital infrastructures that will help mitigate the economic and financial uncertainties for our people.

BWorld 857, The PEPIF 2026 energy forum and the war in Iran

The PEPIF 2026 energy forum and the war in Iran

March 17, 2026 | 12:02 am

My Cup Of Liberty

By Bienvenido S. Oplas, Jr.

https://www.bworldonline.com/opinion/2026/03/17/736694/the-pepif-2026-energy-forum-and-the-war-in-iran/

 

Last week, on March 12, I attended a huge annual energy forum, the Philippine Electric Power Industry Forum (PEPIF) 2026, held at John Hay Convention Center in Baguio City, organized by the Independent Electricity Market Operator of the Philippines (IEMOP).

 

The ongoing fuel supply disruption due to the US/Israel-Iran war was naturally mentioned and discussed. In an opening Keynote Message by Department of Energy (DoE) Secretary Sharon S. Garin (read by her staff), she reiterated that we need energy resilience despite unstable geopolitical developments in the Middle East that adversely affect energy prices and electricity markets.

 

Ms. Garin has been the energy secretary for only eight months and now the world has entered a Distressing Oil (price) Explosion. The supply of very useful hydrocarbon commodities, oil and gas, is now tightening with the closure of the Strait of Hormuz.

 

I checked the prices of certain commodities after two weeks of the war. The price of Dubai crude oil is up by 80%, the Japan Korea Market (JKM) LNG price is up by 51%, and TTF gas in Europe is up by 67%. Countries and companies rushed to coal, whose price is now up by 16%, and not to solar and wind power where the price index changed by 2.4% and -4.5% respectively.

 

The prices of various byproducts of oil and gas — fertilizers, industrial and petrochemical products like naphtha, urea, bitumen, methanol, polypropylene, polyethylene, etc. — are up (see the table).

 


Meralco PowerGen Corp. (MGEN) issued a statement through its president and CEO Manny Rubio, saying they are improving their power generation resilience via “high availability through rigorous plant maintenance, efficient operations, and dedication of our people. We also have sufficient fuel supply for our existing generation facilities… strengthening our long-term contribution to the region’s energy security by investing in new capacities, including large scale renewable energy projects such as the 3,500 MWp (megawatt-peak) MTerra Solar combined with 4,500 MWhr (megawatt-hour) battery energy storage system.”

 

I recognize the important contribution of MGEN in electricity stability via its coal plants in Luzon, Cebu, and Iloilo-Panay. Last week MTerra Solar started contributing to the grid with an 85 MW plus battery. Good.

 

Back to PEPIF 2026. Another keynote speaker that day was Joseph S. Yu, president and CEO of SN Aboitiz Power (SNAP) who talked about “Beyond Megawatts: SNAP’s Approach to Responsible, Resilient, and Reliable Power.”

 

They operationalize the energy trilemma — energy equity, security, and sustainability — via their current 673-MW hydroelectric power plant (HEPP) capacity in Northern Luzon. They have the Binga HEPP with 140 MW and the Ambuklao HEPP with 112.5 MW both in Benguet, the Magat HEPP with 388 MW in Isabela-Ifugao, and the Maris HEPP with 8.5 MW in Isabela.

 

SNAP owns only the HEPPs, not the dams, weirs, and reservoirs that are still owned by either the National Power Corp. – Power Sector Assets and Liabilities Management Corp. (NPC-PSALM) or the National Irrigation Administration. SNAP got these HEPPs up and running after few years of upgrades and repairs, and supplied electricity to the grid while sending money to PSALM and the Department of Finance via privatization proceeds. Ambuklao was upgraded from 75 to 112.5 MW, Binga was upgraded from 100 to 140 MW, and Magat was upgraded from 360 to 388 MW. The engineers and management guys of SNAP are brilliant.

 

In the afternoon I moderated the only panel discussion that day. The six speakers were Energy officials Fielmor C. Amor and Jhannelyn D. Marasigan, Energy Regulatory Commission Director Sharon O. Montaner, Philippines Independent Power Producers Association (PIPPA) Chairman Roman Miguel de Jesus, Ateneo Economics Professor Fernando T. Aldaba, and NGCP’s Redi Allan B. Remoroza.

 

Each speaker was asked three questions. Here are some of them.

 

1. Should the DoE reconsider its “coal repurposing” plan given the shift to coal by many countries as oil-gas become more expensive now? Mr. Amor replied that so far it has not come to the point that the DoE should stop coal repurposing and continue its high renewable energy targets. The DoE is doing other measures to cushion the impact to consumers of high oil and gas prices.

 

2. Should the Philippines tap possible extra oil-gas sources from any from our ASEAN neighbors (Malaysia, Indonesia, Thailand, Vietnam, Brunei)? Ms. Marasigan said that the DoE is looking at the situation and possibly maximizing other resources. Mr. Amor added that biofuels could contribute more inputs to the country’s gasoline-diesel needs.

 

3. Should the ERC target higher power generation per capita, not “low price at all costs” and if the ERC is bending  over backwards to accommodate the offshore wind companies that will get P11/kWh green energy auction rate? ERC’s Ms. Montaner said that it is not really a lower but rather a reasonable price that they target to protect the consumers while encouraging more efficient power plants to come in and not leaving ourselves highly exposed to energy price shocks like now. And the ERC did not bend over backwards; they have been transparent and made public each of the 44 parameters they used in their computations.

 

4. Should PIPPA push back on anti-coal narratives given that the Philippines has very low coal generation per capita among eight East Asian nations? Mr. De Jesus said that countries’ natural endowments contribute to their energy mix, like Vietnam has more hydro, Indonesia so much coal they are exporting it. The independent power producers decide what energy technology and sources are feasible for different consumers.

 

5. Are the many pessimistic scenarios justified given that this is not the first or second or third oil price shock the world has seen? Ateneo’s Mr. Aldaba said that oil price shocks are triggers but there are other factors that contribute to lower growth performance of many countries.

 

6. Is the NGCP ready for the DoE plan of 19 to 50 gigawatts (GW) of offshore wind (OSW) power by 2050 or just 24 years from now? NGCP’s Mr. Remoroza answered that the NGCP is not ready today for those huge OSW plans, but they have already conducted a systems impact study (SIS) of 30 GW of OSW, and that it is good that in GEA-5 there are only 3.3 GW of OSW. The NGCP is now preparing the interconnection from southern Mindoro to Batangas, they have already upgraded this to 500 kilovolts (kV), then come the overhead lines within Mindoro. In Northern Luzon, the NGCP already has a 500 kV backbone.

 

Thanks to Arjon Valencia of IEMOP for giving me the opportunity to be part of PEPIF 2026. Thanks to the sponsors — SN Aboitiz Power, Meralco PowerGen Corp., ACEN, and Exist — for helping IEMOP roll out the logistics for that forum.

Free Trade 77, China exports explosion, US exports rising trend

In January-February 2026 there was a sort of explosion in China exports, $657 billion/month each.


The US also has a rising exports trend with $315 billion in February 2026.
 

From the WTO database, I extracted these numbers.


US have lots of catching up to be at the industrialization and manufacturing level of China.
--------------

See also:

Saturday, April 04, 2026

BWorld 856, Lesson of the Iran war: There is no substitute for fossil fuels

Lesson of the Iran war: There is no substitute for fossil fuels

March 10, 2026 | 12:03 am

My Cup Of Liberty

By Bienvenido S. Oplas, Jr.

https://www.bworldonline.com/opinion/2026/03/10/735057/lesson-of-the-iran-war-there-is-no-substitute-for-fossil-fuels/

 

The continued bombing of Iran by the US and Israel has adversely affected oil and gas prices. There is no problem when it comes to the oil and gas supply; the problem is in their delivery and export from the Middle East to Asia, Europe, and the rest of the world.

 

It is often argued by the climate establishment that the world’s oil, gas, and coal prices should become more expensive via the imposition of carbon, excise, and other related taxes since then people and countries will be forced to use more solar, wind, and other sources of renewable power.

 

Now that hydrocarbon prices are high, businesses and energy companies are supposed to run towards more investments in and use of more solar and wind power, but this is not happening. Companies instead turn to coal to keep the lights and air conditioning on.

 

From Feb. 27, or day before the bombing of Iran, to March 6 or after seven days of war, crude oil (WTI, Brent, Dubai, Urals) prices have gone up from 16% to 54%. Natural gas prices have a wider range of increases, with US natural gas increasing by 12% while Europe’s TTF gas increased by 67%.

 

Meanwhile, solar-wind energy indices declined by 3-4% — they did not increase as expected. Even the nuclear index declined by 11%. It was the price of coal that experienced an increase of 16% (see Table 1).

 

Which shows an inconvenient truth for the climate establishment — the substitute for fossil fuels/hydrocarbons are also fossil fuels/hydrocarbons. If not hydrocarbons from the Middle East, then hydrocarbons from Russia, Australia, or Indonesia, etc. It is delusional to think that solar/wind can substitute for fossil fuels.

 

Even if people use fully electric vehicles like those of BYD or Tesla, they still using oil-based products in the car paint, the dashboard, ceiling and interiors, the leather seats, the electrical wiring insulation, the synthetic rubber tires, polymers and carbon fiber, etc., even the road asphalt! These are among the thousands of oil byproducts.

 

We should expand exploration and development for our domestic oil and gas supply. We should have more offshore oil-gas development instead of irrational and expensive offshore wind.

 

I checked the movement of crude oil trade in 2024, and it showed the following:

 

1. The largest exporters of crude oil are Saudi Arabia, Russia, Canada, the US, the United Arab Emirates, and Iraq. Iran has no official record because of the long-standing sanctions against it, but it kept exporting crude via illicit trade.

 

2. The largest importers of crude oil are China, Europe, the US, India, Japan, and other Asia-Pacific nations (Taiwan, Korea, Australia, etc.).

 

3. The US is the largest producer of crude oil, but its oil is mostly what is called light/sweet. They still need to import heavy/sour oil for their refinery production.

 

4. China’s main source of crude imports is Russia, followed by Saudi Arabia, Iraq, the UAE and other nations from the Middle East (see Table 2).

 


So, it seems that the biggest loser in the continuing war, aside from Iran, is China since 57% of its total crude oil imports in 2024 came from the Middle East, and now the delivery is choked. The US, especially under Trump, has an implicit goal of disallowing China from becoming at par with it in the level of industrialization and political-economic influence on global affairs.

 

PEPIF 2026

The Philippine Electric Power Industry Forum (PEPIF) 2026 will be held on March 12 at John Hay Convention Center in Baguio City. This is a big annual conference organized by the Independent Electricity Market Operator of the Philippines (IEMOP).

 

Keynote and plenary speeches will be held in the morning, then a panel discussion is scheduled for the afternoon which is focused on the theme, “The Energy Trilemma in the Philippines: Pathways to Security, Sustainability and Equity.” The panel speakers will be Energy Undersecretary Mylene Capongcol, Energy Director Luningning Baltazar, Energy Regulatory Commission Director Sharon Montaner, Philippines Independent Power Producers Association Chairman Roman Miguel de Jesus, Ateneo Economics Professor Fernando Aldaba, and the National Grid Corp. of the Philippines’ Redi Allan Remoroza.

 

I will be moderating this panel of articulate speakers, industry players, and regulators. I hope to bring out the best ideas from each of them.

Iran War 4, Gulf fertilizer blockade and food insecurity

The Guardian produced good infographics in their article yesterday,

“‘Food security timebomb’: a visual guide to the Gulf fertiliser blockade”

April 3, 2026

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/apr/03/visual-guide-gulf-fertiliser-blockade




The numbers should make the climate establishment to shut up about their opposition to fossil fuels. No fossil fuels especially oil-gas means no sulfur, no potash, no phosphate, no urea, no ammonia. All used for fertilizers.

Animal manure or "organic fertilizer" can be substitute but it has three disadvantages.

1. Impact on plant needs take months, not days. My rice farmer friend says if you put the animal manure say in the first planting season (May-June), real growth in rice is felt in the second planting season (Sept-Oct).

2. Need huge volume of animal dung -- low fertilizer density -- to get the desired productivity and output per hectare of rice. There are not many cows around as land priority is rice farming, cattle farming is just sideline income of farmers.

3. Many grasses quickly grow. Cows eat grasses including their roots, the cow dung includes latent grasses ready to germinate with just 1 rain. More grasses mean more competition for soil minerals, less growth for rice. 
 
It's really the chemical fertilizers that deliver the desired growth for rice within days and weeks, not months, minus the grasses.
---------------

See also:

PhilStar 84, Asian growth during period of oil price shocks

Asian growth during period of oil price shocks

ENERGY, INFRA AND ECONOMICS - Bienvenido Oplas Jr. - The Philippine Star

March 12, 2026 | 12:00am

https://www.philstar.com/business/2026/03/12/2513601/asian-growth-during-period-oil-price-shocks



We often hear and read how bad things can be for the Philippines and many other countries in the world as a result of the high oil-gas prices with the ongoing Iran war. While this is understandable, it also begs a look back of past economic performance as this is not the first or second  time that the world has seen huge oil price shocks. There were many precedents already.

 

1970s-1990s

 

The first large oil price shock occurred in late 1973-1974, triggered by the Yom Kippur war in Israel and its aftermath. Dubai crude jumped from $2.8/barrel in 1973 to $10.4/barrel in 1974 or nearly four times price hike.

 

The second occurred in 1979 during the Iran civil war, oil price jumped from $13/barrel in 1978 to $29.8 in 1979, or more than double price hike. The third occurred in 2000 during the large Palestine intifada vs Israel, the price jumped from $16.9/barrel in 1999 to $26.3/barrel in 2000.

 

For brevity purposes, I will get the period averages for both Dubai crude prices and GDP growth in percent as follows: (a) 1972-1973 (b) 1974-1978 (c) 1979-1985 (d) 1986-1999.

 

Data sources: for crude oil prices, Energy Institute’s Statistical Review of World Energy 2025. GDP annual growth 1970s from WB’s World Development Indicators database; GDP annual growth 1980s onwards from IMF’s World Economic Outlook database; averages are my computations.

 

For Dubai crude prices in $/barrel: (a) 2.4 (b) 11.6 (c) 30.8 (d) 16.1. Rising oil prices in (b) and (c) then decline in (d).

 

The average GDP growth in percent of big East Asia 3 (EA-3) in periods (a) to (d) were as follows: China: 5.8, 5.7, 9.9, 9.8; Korea: 11.1, 10.8, 7.9, 8.4; Japan: 8.2, 3.1, 4.2, 2.5.

 

For the ASEAN-6: Singapore: 12.0, 6.4, 7.8, 7.6; Malaysia: 10.5, 7.0, 6.1, 7.0;

 

Indonesia: 7.6, 7.0, 6.1, 5.6; Thailand: 7.3, 7.8, 5.3, 6.7;

 

Philippines: 7.1, 5.7, 0.7, 3.5; Vietnam: no data for (a) and (b); 5.3, 6.6.

 

The high growth in China and Korea were hardly affected by high oil prices in (b) and (c) while Japan was affected in (b) and did not benefit from lower prices in (d).

 

Among the ASEAN-6, some growth decline in (b) and (c) but still at high levels except the Philippines in (c) where there was economic crisis from 1983-1985 in the previous Marcos Sr. administration.

 

The performance of rich countries in the West, same period, they really experienced lower growth in (b) and (c): US: 5.5, 3.0, 2.8, 3.4; Canada: 6.1, 3.6, 2.8, 2.6;

 

Germany: 4.5, 2.3, 1.6, 2.5; UK: 5.4, 1.1, 1.9, 2.7.

 

2000 to 2019

 

Continuing from the earlier periods, I divide the new periods into five: (e) 2000-2004 (f) 2005-2007 (g) 2008-2010 (h) 2011-2014 and (i) 2015-2019. I stopped in 2019 to exclude the 2020-2021 lockdown years where economic distortion was horrible.

 

Dubai crude prices in $ per barrel from (e) to (i) were: 26.6, 58.7, 77.7, 104.4, and 55.8. So from period (d) there was sustained increases to (e) up to (h) then stabilized at (i).

 

GDP performance of EA-3 in percent, China: 9.3, 12.8, 9.9, 8.1, 6.7;

 

Korea: 6.0, 5.1, 3.6, 3.2, 3.0; Japan: 1.4, 1.5, -0.9, 0.9, 0.8. China was hardly affected even by the $104/barrel oil. Korea was mildly affected while Japan was adversely affected with contraction and below 1.0 percent growth.

 

GDP performance of ASEAN-6, Vietnam: 7.2, 7.2, 5.8, 6.0, 7.1;

 

Indonesia: 4.6, 5.8, 6.2, 5.7, 5.0; Philippines: 4.6, 5.6, 4.4, 6.0, 6.6;

 

Malaysia: 5.4, 5.6, 3.6, 5.4, 4.9; Singapore: 5.3, 8.5, 5.5, 4.9, 3.2;

 

Thailand: 5.5, 4.9, 2.8, 2.9, 3.4. The ASEAN-6 economies were also hardly affected by high oil price shocks.

 

The industrial west’s GDP performance, US: 2.7, 2.8, 0.1, 2.1, 2.6;

 

Canada: 3.0, 2.6, 0.4, 2.5, 1.9; UK: 2.9, 2.6, -0.9, 1.9, 2.0;

 

Germany: 1.0, 2.5, -0.2, 1.7, 1.8. They have sustained low growth, even UK and Germany contraction in period (g) where the US finance and housing crisis happened.

 

From the above data, there is economic basis to argue that many East Asia and ASEAN countries in particular can weather the current high oil prices as the countries have achieved internal and regional economic dynamism and resilience.

 

The Philippines’ growth target of five to six percent this year appears to be attainable on the low side but the reason is more on the continuing corruption scandal and lower business confidence than the current oil price shock, which is affecting many countries worldwide.

 

Europe will experience double whammy, high energy prices from MidEast or imported LNG from the US, plus less access to cheap Russia oil-gas. Whereas China (and India) will benefit from more inflows of cheap Russia oil-gas, and China exports of so many manufactured goods like trucks, buses, cars, chips and consumer items will help improve East Asian productivity while keeping inflation low and manageable.

 

I see more migration of capital and companies from Europe to East Asia, including the Philippines. This will compensate for the economic hardship from higher global oil prices.

 

The Philippines as Chair of the  ASEAN this year will have the great opportunity to advance a regional agenda of Peace and Prosperity. More trade and investments, more commerce and tourism in the region while the US and Europe are into endless wars and interventionist regime change projects.

 

President Marcos, Executive Secretary Ralph Recto and the rest of the Cabinet leadership have this great chance to pursue regional Peace and Prosperity. All war mongering agenda should be set aside, both Ukraine and Iran wars show how ugly and evil wars are.

BWorld 855, The ASEAN economic agenda and the Philippines’ fiscal condition

The ASEAN economic agenda and the Philippines’ fiscal condition

March 5, 2026 | 12:02 am

My Cup Of Liberty

By Bienvenido S. Oplas, Jr.

https://www.bworldonline.com/opinion/2026/03/05/734233/the-asean-economic-agenda-and-the-philippines-fiscal-condition/

 

Last week, on Feb. 24, I attended the ASEAN Editors and Economic Opinion Leaders Forum at the Fairmont Hotel in Makati. Organized by the Department of Trade and Industry (DTI), it was a huge forum with a huge audience. I counted five Cabinet Secretaries who spoke there — DTI Secretary Ma. Cristina Roque, Finance Secretary Frederick Go, Education Secretary Sonny Angara, Energy Secretary Sharon Garin, and Information and Communication Technology Secretary Henry Aguda.

 

Executive Secretary Ralph Recto was supposed to give a keynote speech in the morning and Presidential Communications Office (PCO) Secretary Dave Gomez was supposed to speak in the last panel discussion in the afternoon. Perhaps President Ferdinand Marcos, Jr. asked them to work in their offices instead as he himself faced the audience and foreign officials.

 

The president spoke in the afternoon, not with a prepared speech but rather in a one-on-one interview with veteran broadcaster Rico Hizon. The President did not even glance at his prepared notes. It was the first time I had seen and heard him speak in a spontaneous set up, and I was pleasantly surprised and impressed — he was very articulate and knowledgeable about many issues and reform items. From the territorial dispute in the South China Sea (he did not use the term “West Philippine Sea”), to incentives to attract more foreign investments, from reducing the burden of bureaucracy for business, to expanding our exports, from potential candidates for President in 2028, to the ASEAN chairmanship, and much more.

 

Mr. Hizon asked the president who would be his candidate for 2028 elections, in order to ensure the continuity of his economic programs and reforms. Mr. Marcos answered that it should be someone who understands economics, how to control inflation, expand GDP and production, increase investments and job creation, and improve the welfare of the Filipinos. A simple, direct, and honest response by the President — I liked it.

 

Mr. Hizon also asked the president what his focus would be as Chair of the ASEAN this year. He said that his priority is to make the ASEAN stick to its original purpose, to be an economic bloc unified in pursuing economic prosperity for the members and their people. A beautiful response. I would call it his “ASEAN Economic Agenda of Peace and Prosperity.” Yes, Mr. President, we can never go wrong with such a primordial goal.

 

One thing I noticed at the ASEAN event was that it was supposedly an editors and economic columnists/writers’ forum but there were very few media people in the room, mostly broadcast people and TV anchors like Rico Hizon, Karen Davila, Regina Hing, and Cathy Yang. And the editor-in-chief of the Straits Times of Singapore. I did not see the editor in chiefs (EICs) of big Philippine newspapers. The bulk of the audience was made up of corporate people plus a few undersecretaries of certain agencies.

 

Thus, the ASEAN Editors and Economic Opinion Leaders Forum became an ASEAN Business and Economic Leaders Forum. I read a few reports in print media on how the reporters and journalists were excluded from the venue and relegated to a separate room watching on wide screen TV monitors. I think the DTI should have co-organized it with the PCO because the office knows all the major editors and economic columnists and opinion leaders in the country.

 

CATCHING UP

Some ASEAN countries are industrializing very fast. For instance, when looking at the exports of manufactured goods in 2024, Singapore and Vietnam had exported $376 billion and $339 billion worth, more than UK and Canada, while Malaysia was catching up with Canada and may have overtaken it in 2025.

 

The Philippines still has a long way to go to catch up with the rest of the ASEAN-6 but is still far ahead of the other ASEAN-4.

 

Considering the risks of higher prices for oil-gas from the Middle East as the US/Israel-Iran war continues, I checked the value of ASEAN countries’ imports of fuels and mining products. Singapore leads in the ASEAN with $93 billion in 2024, followed by Malaysia and Thailand.

 

China and the US are the large importers of these products, as their exports are powered by fossil fuels and metallic products importation (see Table 1).

 


CASH OPERATIONS

Last Tuesday, the Bureau of the Treasury (BTr) finally released the government’s full year 2025 cash operations report (COR). The fiscal condition remained flattish, the budget deficit was still at around P1.6 trillion a year, financing or net borrowings was still at P1.4 trillion a year. Revenues are rising, but expenditures are rising fast too (see Table 2).

 


The large-scale privatization of some government assets and corporations should be done to raise more revenues without raising taxes. And there should be spending cuts to control the hemorrhage in public expenditures, like reforming the Military and Uniformed Personnel pension, cutting the budgets of state universities and reallocating the funds to public elementary and secondary education.

PhilStar 83, The Iran war, oil taxes, Meralco and Nordeco

The Iran war, oil taxes, Meralco and Nordeco

ENERGY, INFRA AND ECONOMICS - Bienvenido Oplas Jr. - The Philippine Star

March 5, 2026 | 12:00am

https://www.philstar.com/business/2026/03/05/2512050/iran-war-oil-taxes-meralco-and-nordeco

 

This piece will cover several topics -- from the Iran war and high world oil-gas prices, to domestic power issues.

 

Higher world oil, LNG, and even coal prices

 

Middle East countries produce and export oil and gas, no coal. Energy prices last Feb. 27 or day before the US-Israel bombings of Iran, WTI crude was $59.6/barrel, EU natural gas was euro 32/MWH, coal Newcastle was $118.5/ton. As of March 4, 11 a.m. Manila time, WTI crude was $75.3/barrel, EU natgas was euro 53.6/MWH, and coal was $138/ton.

 

The expectation and advocacies of many sectors is that when oil-gas prices spike high, people would demand more solar and wind for energy use, this did not happen. From Feb. 27 to March 4, solar energy index is flat at $54.6, wind energy index declined from $24.5 to $23.5. Meaning, energy companies quickly shifted to coal for power generation. Not solar or wind.

 

Reducing oil excise tax

 

The most prominent and most rational public policy discussion now in the Philippines is how to adjust to these energy price hikes. Under the TRAIN Law of 2017 (RA 10963) the President can reduce excise tax on petroleum products should Dubai crude exceed $80 per barrel for sometime. TRAIN has increased the excise tax of diesel and bunker fuel from zero to P6/liter, kerosene from zero to P5/liter, aviation gas from zero to P4/liter, regular and premium gasoline from P4 to P10/liter, LPG from zero to P3/kg and so on.

 

I support this move. If possible, any revision to the TRAIN law should lower the threshold for excise tax downward adjustment from $80 to $75/barrel.

 

Higher inflation from oil tax hikes under TRAIN law

 

Here are the inflation numbers in 2017, 2018 and 2019 (in percent): Singapore: 0.6, 0.4, 0.6; Malaysia: 3.8, 1.0, 0.7; Thailand: 0.7, 1.1, 0.7; Cambodia: 2.9, 2.4, 2.0; Indonesia: 3.8, 3.3, 2.8; Vietnam: 3.5, 3.5, 2.8; Philippines: 2.9, 5.3, 2.4.

 

Thus, of the seven ASEAN countries, only the Philippines experienced big jump in inflation in 2018 while the others have either flat or lower inflation in 2018. Despite being subjected to similar global and regional economic and energy circumstances that year. The simple reason why the Philippines has high inflation that year was the implementation of high oil taxes starting January 2018. To correct this, oil taxes should decline to be compensated by lower public spending somewhere.

 

Other proposals to reduce domestic oil prices

 

One, continue if not expand fuel subsidies for jeepneys under the Pantawid Pasada Program when global oil prices hit the $80-per-barrel threshold. No or discontinue, please. If government must subsidize public transportation, it must subsidize all including provincial and Metro Manila buses, including taxi and so on.

 

Two, local government should ban motorcades and caravans to save fuel. No, let people and businesses decide about their households and business needs. Bans and prohibitions are slippery slope that can lead to more bans in other sectors and sub-sectors.

 

Three, DOE via PNOC should build big oil storage facilities to store oil when prices are low, then release oil when prices are high. No. Let the private gas companies themselves build and maintain their own oil storage structures and facilities.

 

Four, accelerate energy diversification via more RE and early decommissioning of coal plants, reduce dependence on imported fossil fuels. Yes to energy diversification, No to killing of coal plants. As discussed above, the quickest adjustment by countries and companies to keep the lights and airconditioning on, is to ramp up their coal plants.

 

Meralco and MGEN 2025 finance and operating results

 

Last week, Feb. 25, I attended the Meralco presscon on their financial and operating results for 2025. Meralco’s top five officials led by chairman and CEO Manny V. Pangilinan spoke and gave briefings on the company’s good financial position.

 

Consolidated corporate net income (CCNI) showed 12 percent growth. Distribution utility or Meralco proper has P29.6 billion or 58 percent of CCNI, sales volume is flat at 53,997 GWH in 2024 to 54,325 GWH in 2025.

 

Power generation via Meralco Power Gen Corp. (MGEN) contributed P16.8 billion or 33 percent of CCNI. Sales volume increased from 15,296 GWW in 2024 to 27,289 GWH in 2025 or 78 percent increase. Rock star performance, kudos to MGEN president and CEO Manny Rubio.

 

The biggest contribution in MGEN’s CCNI is its 40.2 percent stake in LNGPH, the Philippines’ most expansive integrated LNG facility that supplies about 18 percent of Luzon’s electricity need, from zero in 2024 to 11,912 GWH sales in 2025.

 

A very useful expansion would be the Atimonan coal plant in Quezon province, 1,200 MW of high efficiency low emission (HELE) coal plant that should be operational by 2030. Then a 74-MW coal expansion in Toledo, Cebu. Visayas grid has the thinnest reserve margins compared to Luzon and Mindanao grids, and Cebu sub-grid is always under heavy pressure to produce more electricity and avoid frequent Earth Hours there.

 

NORDECO employees coercion

 

I saw one weird development posted on Facebook. Employees of Northern Davao Electric Coop (Nordeco) were ordered to use social media to protect the cooperative and oppose the takeover by Davao Light and Power Co. (DLPC) which already got the congressional franchise to also serve Davao del Norte and Davao de Oro provinces. The order dated Jan. 29, 2026 was signed by acting general manager Elvera Alngog.

 

Employees who cannot show enough screenshots of their social media posts and sharing are threatened with administrative sanctions based on their Code of Ethics.

 

This is another proof that many electric cooperatives are weak in finance and efficient service to customers but strong in politics and dirty tricks. Nordeco should shut up and follow the franchise law.