Wednesday, May 12, 2021

Climate 100, Marc Morano lecture

I watched a lecture by Marc Morano in Heartland Institute and hosted by Sterling Burnett, cool.
ICCC-14 Preview, Ep. 2: Marc Morano on his new best-seller, "Green Fraud", 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vyY0yj_za6k

Marc has many slides, I repost below some interesting ones. To save space, I put them side by side.









Some old stories here.

Brutal 2020/21 Northern Hemisphere Winter One For Record Books…And Continues Into Late April! 
By P Gosselin on 21. April 2021
https://notrickszone.com/2021/04/21/brutal-2020-21-northern-hemisphere-winter-one-for-record-books-and-continues-into-late-april/

Where Is The “Climate Emergency”?
Willis Eschenbach  April 25, 2021 
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2021/04/25/wheres-the-emergency/

UAH Global Temperature Update for April 2021: -0.05 deg. C 
May 2nd, 2021 
http://www.drroyspencer.com/2021/05/uah-global-temperature-update-for-april-2021-0-05-deg-c/
------------

See also:
Climate 97, Econ and infra implications of a cooling planet, February 24, 2021 
Climate 98, Australia's worst flooding for decades, March 25, 2021 
Climate 99, Cooling trend, virus alarm and climate alarm, April 15, 2021.

Tuesday, May 11, 2021

Macroecon 3, Five quarters of consecutive Philippines GDP contraction

Today, the Philippine Statistics Authority (PSA) released the country's Q1 GDP, it's -4.2%. So five quarters of consecutive contraction.

https://psa.gov.ph/national-accounts

We should congratulate these very bright doctors and groups for endlessly calling for lockdown, which are music to the ears of the DOH and IATF -- Drs. Leachon, Salvana, OCTA, PMA, HPAAC, etc. They are very bright physician-economists, their indefinite lockdown as economic policy, their designation of businesses and work which are essential and non-essential, which businesses should continue and which ones should go bankrupt, have been carried out for 14 months straight, and the above chart is the result of their bright policy.

The -4.2% contraction is also deeper than what many private and academic economists have predicted, median of -2.6%. This was published in BusinessWorld yesterday.

Jonas Ravelas of BDO (-4.5%) and Alvin Ang/Ateneo (-3.8%) have good assumptions and hence, good projections. The others, especially those with -3% or higher have poor assumptions. All projections are as good only as their assumptions. Lousy assumptions, lousy projections. Like climate and ever-warming projections.

In our UP ETC chat group, I have an exchange last night with a friend, ADB guy, he projected -3%. I said my projection is -3% to -4%, or around -3.5%. My basis is electricity consumption. Meralco electricity sales Q1 was -4% drop, WESM electricity consumption for Luzon-Visayas grids Q1 was about -4.3% so I was looking at -4% originally.

Also in Q1 2020, all provincial buses were still running, many hotels and restaurants open, until March 15. Lockdown ECQ was imposed March 16. Whereas in Q1 2021, about 90% of all provincial buses still not running, many hotels and resorts still close. This alone would lead to deep dive in GDP Q1 this year.

IATF policies lead to major economic distortions. Like putting Metro Manila + neighbor provinces Bulacan, Rizal, Cavite under is ECQ or MECQ, then nearby provinces like Tarlac, Pangasinan, N. Ecija, Batangas, etc erect checkpoints and stop ALL vehicles if motorists have travel passes. If they don't have one, they are told to turn back. Government personnel and motorists are often exempted, even if they have no travel pass they just allowed to proceed, among the regular government double talk.

Household consumption constitutes about 70% of GDP. Here are the components and performance.


Notice that Q1 2021 Household consumption of P3.15 trillion is at similar level with Q3 2018 of P3.15 trillion, 2 1/2 years ago.


As of today May 11, seven East Asian economies have reported their Q1 2021 GDP:Taiwan 8.2%, Hong Kong 7.8%, Vietnam 4.5%, South Korea 1.8%, Singapore 0.2%, Indonesia -0.7%, Philippines -4.2%. China reported 18.3% growth but CN is known for doctored and dishonest econ data.
So far PH remains the worst performing economy in the region.a

Is a 7% full year 2021 GDP growth possible? 
No. Best scenario would be 5-6. Here's why.
At -4.2% contraction in Q1, that means average growth in the next three quarters, Q2 to Q4 must be at least 9.3% to have full year 7% growth, Which is impossible. First half of Q2 (April 1 to May 15) we are still in tight lockdown ECQ or MECQ, the best we can grow in Q2 might be 5%.
-----------------

See also:
The Constitution and FDIs, February 16, 2021 
Macroecon 1, Household debt to GDP ratio, March 23, 2021 
Macroecon 2, Modest growth in Q1 2021, some Asian countries, April 30, 2021.

Saturday, May 08, 2021

Weekend Fun 77, Duwag sa curfew, Duwag sa Carpio

Yesterday, the #1 trending topic in Twitter in the Philippines was #DuterteDuwag (Duterte a coward).

Here are some of the memes posted in Twitter, this one is among the funniest :-)

Why?

It started with the President challenging early this week the retired SC Justice Antonio Carpio to a debate on the West PH Sea (WPS) or SCS and China stealing of some Philippine territories. Yesterday he backed out -- as expected by many people.




Chill out, Mr. President. Many people are laughing at you.
------------ 

See also:
Weekend Fun 74, CNN as the US' "Baghdad Bob", August 29, 2020
Weekend Fun 75, Lockdown, inflation, climate memes, April 02, 2021 
Weekend Fun 76, Drunk politicians and other professionals, April 25, 2021.

Thursday, May 06, 2021

Covid 35, Dr. Rafael Castillo letter to HPAAC

This was shared by Doc Raffy Castillo to CDC PH, posted in the group's fb page, shared also in many Viber groups. Doc Raffy is among the most prominent cardiologists in the country. I was there at Brgy. Matandang Balara, QC, event last April 29. I was surprised at the huge number of media people who attended, aside from the locals and Brgy residents who came. I attach three photos I took that day, below.
-----------------

5 May, 2021

Dr. TONY DANS
Spokesperson
Healthcare Professionals Alliance Against Covid 9 (HPAAC)

Dear Tony, Warm greetings.

I feel saddened to read your statement today, as well as separate but similarly worded statements from the Philippine Medical Association (PMA) and the Philippine College of Physicians (PCP).

This letter is not a complaint but a firm request that HAACP and its member medical organizations, the PMA and PCP, immediately correct the disinformation or misinformation created by your respective advisories that doctors prescribing Ivermectin off-label for Covid-19 outside the compassionate special permit (CSP) are violating the law and may be sanctioned for such act. In effect, you were categorically stating that there is no other legally allowed authorization for the prescription of ivermectin except through the CSP pathway.

May I cite Director-General Eric Domingo’s clarification in various media interviews on this subject that there is no FDA policy prohibiting Ivermectin prescription off-label, with the prescription served by licensed compounding pharmacies. These interviews in print and broadcast media can be easily accessed online.

Quite a number of doctors exercising their right to prescribe a drug they believe to be beneficial to their patients have been unduly threatened by the half-accurate statements and advisories of the HPAAC, PMA and PCP.

Not only were the doctors’ and patients’ rights violated, but your separate unfairly harsh statements have caused them and their families undue anxiety and distress of possible license revocation or criminal prosecution.

Your statement likewise generated a malicious imputation that the medical volunteers including myself who participated in the charity medical mission at Matandang Balara, Quezon City last week (April 29, Thursday) committed an illegal act of disseminating Ivermectin. This is not only an utter show of disrespect to colleagues in the medical profession, but a serious attack on the reputation and integrity of the medical volunteers involved.

You were not even there to witness the kind of service we gave all who sought our assistance face-to-face, not in the comfort, convenience and protection of a telemedicine app. We rendered our service willingly, gladly and wholeheartedly. How many of you and your colleagues will be willing to render free face-to-face consultation in a Covid- infested area?

You know very well that I, an elderly high-risk Covid survivor, would not have risked my health getting another infection if I and the other medical volunteers didn’t strongly believe that we’re doing something that is more important than our own personal safety. Did you and your colleagues in HPAAC, PMA and PCP think of that even for a single moment? Instead, your statements made us appear as irresponsible medical practitioners, prescribing medicines that are unsafe for the public, and we may be compromising their safety and welfare.

The medical volunteers and the other organizers of the QC medical mission seek no recognition for what we have done, but to be subjected to the kind of humiliation and rebuke which your statements have caused us, attacks the very foundation of our society where mutual respect is a fundamental value.

We are truly saddened because your serious imputations on our reputation and integrity could have been easily prevented with a little due diligence of finding out the true facts, instead of relying on malicious fake news. With simple web browsing, you should have updated yourselves of the FDA circular of April 13, 2021, signed by FDA Deputy Director-General Oscar Gutierrez, Jr. who emphasized that ivermectin is “authorized” by the FDA. This means it cannot be considered an illegal drug.

Various newspapers reported it also prominently (FDA: No policy prohibiting Ivermectin, https://tribune.net.ph/index.php/2021/04/14/fda-no-policy-prohibiting-ivermectin/

In several other FDA advisories, the FDA also reiterated that doctors are allowed to prescribe Ivermectin off-label for Covid-19. In several media interviews, Director- General Eric Domingo, also affirmed it, that the FDA does not have a policy banning or prohibiting Ivermectin prescription or consumption within the provisions they have set for either CSP in hospitalized patients, and for off-label prescribing by doctors for ambulatory patients or out-patients.

In the April 13 statement, FDA Deputy Director-General Gutierrez, Jr. emphasized that Ivermectin is “authorized” by the FDA. This means it cannot be considered an illegal drug.

The statement further advised that pharmacists, who hold valid licenses, can compound Ivermectin and dispense compounded drug preparations “upon a written order” of a doctor for patients seen by the doctor. All of these requirements were complied with during the QC medical mission.

Despite the serious actual and moral damages that your statements have caused the medical volunteers in the QC medical mission, and all who prescribe Ivermectin off-label for their patients, we hold no rancor in our hearts.

But we demand that the HPAAC, PMA and PCP immediately correct, within 72 hours from receipt of this letter, the disinformation you had caused and apologize for having unduly violated the rights of the medical volunteers and caused actual and moral damages on them.

If you fail to correct the injustice you had caused the medical volunteers and other Ivermectin advocates within 72 hours, then we shall be compelled to exhaust all possible legal remedies to seek redress for this grave injustice.

We pray that you be guided properly.

Wishing you the love and peace only Jesus can provide,

Sincerely yours,

Rafael R. Castillo, MD, MBA, FPCP, FPCC, FESC, ISHF

Cc: Department of Health,
Professional Regulations Commission,
Philippine Food and Drug Administration,
Philippine Medical Association,
Philippine College of Physicians,
Concerned Doctors and Citizen of the Philippines,
Matandang Balara, QC Medical Mission Organizing Committee
---------------

See also:
Covid 27, Dr. Rafael Castillo on vaccine, Ivermectin, and lifting the lockdown, March 24, 2021
Covid 32, Continuing economic damage of indefinite lockdown, April 23, 2021 
Covid 33, CDC PH statement on lifting the lockdown, April 28, 2021 
Covid 34, Drs. Romy Quijano and Iggy Agbayani on IVM, May 05, 2021.

IPR and Innovation 49, Planned compulsory licensing on Covid vax

I just noticed there are many efforts to kill intellectual property rights (IPR) like the proposed compulsory licensing (CL) on patent of new vaccines vs Covid. See these for instance:

1. Calls for Compulsory Licensing and IP Waivers of COVID-19 Vaccines Ignore Technical Complexities 
By Joanna T. Brougher, Esq., MPH & Andrew Kingsbury  March 30, 2021
https://www.ipwatchdog.com/2021/03/30/calls-compulsory-licensing-ip-waivers-covid-19-vaccines-ignore-technical-complexities/id=131617/

2. Compulsory licensing and Covid-19 vaccines: when fake news spoil the public debate
Matthieu Dhenne (Ipsilon)/April 14, 2021
http://patentblog.kluweriplaw.com/2021/04/14/compulsory-licensing-and-covid-19-vaccines-when-fake-news-spoil-the-public-debate/ 

3. Free licensing of vaccines to end the COVID-19 crisis
Kayvan Bozorgmehr, Rosa Jahn, David Stuckler, Martin McKee
Published:March 18, 2021 DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00467-0
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(21)00467-0/fulltext

4. U.S. Vaccine Patent Surprise Roils Pharma as WTO Debate Heats Up 
By Jenny Leonard, Eric Martin, and Viktoria Dendrinou
May 6, 2021, 2:57 AM GMT+8 
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-05-05/u-s-to-back-waiver-of-vaccine-ip-protections-at-wto-tai-says

5. EU May Join US In Backing Proposal To Waive COVID Vaccine Patents 
Tyler Durden  THURSDAY, MAY 06, 2021 - 07:00 AM 
https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/eu-may-join-us-backing-proposal-waive-covid-vaccine-patents

6. ANALYSIS: In a decision on COVID-19 vaccine patents, Joe Biden chose humanity 
By Stephen Collinson  May 6, 2021 11:08:42 AM
https://cnnphilippines.com/world/2021/5/6/joe-biden-covid19-patent.html

With vax vax vax pushing, there was love affair among Pfizer, AZ, Moderna, JnJ, etc. and WHO, Biden, Fauci, etc. Now with IPR-busting policy like CL of these newly-invented vax, it will be Pfizer, AZ, Moderna, etc. versus WHO, Biden, Fauci, etc. (this meme from 123rf.com)

This should be a big fight, Big pharma vs Big government, Big UN/WHO. I will watch with popcorn and whiskey :-)

CNN has joined the ideological attacks on IPR with its cute headline "Joe Biden chose humanity." Fine. But will CNN also pressure China to have CL for their Sinovac so that "Xi Jinping chose humanity"? If No, then CNN further shows its partly (not entirely) becomes the China News Network.

If Biden and WHO will double down on CL for all western vax, CNN, NYT, etc will echo their position. But will these Big media be silent on CL for Sinovac, Sinopharm?

One may ask, who wants CL for Sinovac anyway?

Good question. If they have to be consistent, they must call for CL for Sinovac. But all leftists are inconsistent, they favor one and attack another one.

Now vax-pushing WHO praises China's Sinovac.

Sinovac COVID-19 vaccine effective but some data lacking – WHO 
Reuters, MAY 6, 2021 11:25 AM PHT
https://www.rappler.com/science/life-health/sinovac-covid-19-vaccine-effective-some-data-lacking-who

Will WHO also call for CL of Sinovac since it's "effective" anyway? Or like CNN, WHO will only threaten western vax with CL but spare Sinovac from their IPR attacks? If Yes, then WHO somehow confirms that it's partly a Wuhan Health Organization.

The free market think tank Geneva Network has a sane and rational view on IPR.

IP rights are the key to Covid-19 vaccines 
Prof. Mark Schultz  February 3, 2021
https://geneva-network.com/research/why-intellectual-property-rights-are-a-key-not-a-curse-for-covid-19-vaccines/

Meanwhile, suspicious moves by Pfizer. 

1. Pfizer CEO: Third vaccine dose ‘likely’ needed within 12 months
Researchers currently do not know how long vaccines provide protection against the coronavirus.
16 Apr 2021
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2021/4/16/pfizer-ceo-vaccine-third-dose-likely-needed-within-12-months-2

2. FDA says Pfizer likely to apply for EUA extension of COVID-19 jabs for Filipinos aged 12 to 15
By: Cathrine Gonzales / 09:37 AM May 04, 2021
https://newsinfo.inquirer.net/1426923/fda-says-pfizer-likely-to-apply-for-eua-extension-of-covid-19-jabs-for-filipinos-aged-12-to-15

NYT noticed Pfizer profit, this story could be a precursor for NYT joining the CL attacks. 

Pfizer Reaps Hundreds of Millions in Profits From Covid Vaccine
The company said its vaccine generated $3.5 billion in revenue in the first three months of this year.
By Rebecca Robbins and Peter S. Goodman  May 4, 2021  Updated 9:26 a.m. ET
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/05/04/business/pfizer-covid-vaccine-profits.html
------------

See also:
IPR and Innovation 46, IP rules and Covid-19, April 17, 2020 
IPR and Innovation 47, Our Joint Declaration on WHA, May 18, May 21, 2020 
IPR and Innovation 48, More medicine access via lower taxes and bureaucracies, November 08, 2020.

Wednesday, May 05, 2021

Facebook disabled CDC PH group, then restored it

This morning when I opened my facebook, I received a notice from them:

When I went to the CDC PH page, https://www.facebook.com/groups/168609228434049, this appeared.


In my notification button, there was one notice from FB, I clicked it,


Here's what I posted that I got from a doctor friend which made fb angry or cite "against our community standards":
----------

Studies have found 6 mechanisms by which Ivermectin prevents Covid 19 infections and cures it:

1.Ivermectin prevents the virus from entering target body cells even if it has already entered through the mouth, nose, or eyes. 

It binds into the spike - the corona - protein, making it unable to key into ACE-2 receptors at the surface of the cells and making it open (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32871846/). It’s like a key smeared with epoxy that has hardened, it cannot fit into the keyhole anymore. This includes emerging strains with mutations on the spike protein that threaten to disable existing vaccines. Unlike the vaccines, this allows the immune system to develop antibodies – immunity - for each emerging variant spike protein encountered (https://www.who.int/news-room/feature-stories/detail/how-do-vaccines-work). 

2.Even with the virus already inside the cells, Ivermectin prevents further entry to the cell nucleus to control it and shut down the immune response. This is why initially, patients don’t feel anything.

Ivermectin binds into Importin α/β1 heterodimer protein which the virus uses as the transport to enter the cell's control center - its nucleus (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22417684/).

3.Ivermectin prevents the virus from replicating by inhibiting the Helicase enzyme it needs to do so. This is why Ivermectin may also be effective against some forms of cancer.

Ivermectin inhibits the Helicase enzyme necessary to initiate genomic transcription and eventually complete replication through protein translation (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5835698/)

4.Ivermectin prevents COVID-19-induced Cytokine Storm that triggers respiratory distress (ARDS) and attacks of immune cells on healthy organs resulting in organ damage, failure, and mortality.

A cytokine storm is the release of a large amount of pro-inflammatory signaling molecules called cytokines, causing multisystem organ failure and death. In SARS-COV-2, it also causes the leakage of fluids into the alveolar spaces in the lungs, blocking Oxygen intake. Ivermectin is an immuno-modulator that suppresses cytokine storms (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19109745/)

5.A fatal effect of SARS-COV-2 infection is the blood becoming sticky and blocking blood vessels and Oxygen from being delivered to cells. 

SARS-COV-2 infection uses the protein receptor CD147 in the membranes of red blood cells to make the blood sticky and cause blockage in blood vessels. Ivermectin alleviates CD147-mediated blood vessel blockage and blood clots (https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3636557).

6.Ivermectin increases Interferon production and enhances its effects. 

Interferons are like bullets fired by the body's immune system that destroy viruses like SARS-COV-2 upon entry. But when the viruses are so many that they overwhelm the body's immune system, the undestroyed viruses stick to the target cells and get in to use them to multiply and infect other cells. Increased Interferon production and enhancement in its effects were observed in Onchocerciasis patients administered with Ivermectin (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7930742/)

Ivermectin prevents infection. 
It shortens the period of viral shedding making one stop transmitting the virus sooner.
It is an effective anti-viral and an anti inflammatory drug. 
Negating Ivermectin's capacities and not using it to save others is inhuman.
Pushing expensive drugs on the poor and needy is immoral. 
Ask your conscience, "Am I doing what is right?"

Please pass on to all our doctors.
-------------

This afternoon, one CDC PH member, Mr. Mari Kaimo, wrote to fb:

"Three times now Facebook has shut down a group managed by the Concerned Doctors and Citizens of the Philippines in which we were freely and openly discussing the many possible medical and other solutions for the pandemic. 

If Facebook truly does care for its subscribers, then it should DO THE RIGHT THING and HOLD A FACEBOOK LIVE DEBATE between the representatives of the Philippine Department of Health, the WHO and anyone else who Facebook has been taking orders from to suspend groups like ours or delete them completely. It is  time to bring these so-called "fact checkers" out of hiding so that we can all find out whether they are truly the experts that FB believes them to be. 

It is time that we, as Facebook users, were given the right to confront our accusers and hold them to account for the lies they have been telling about us and our advocacy. If the science really is on their side, then they will win the debate handily. If, on the other hand, they have no facts or evidence to support their claims, then all of Facebook will see who it is who has been endangering people's lives all along. We at CDC Ph know for a fact that it is not us."
-------------

And FB has restored the group's page this afternoon. Thank you for listening, FB. 

The original CDC PH page has 30k+ members and FB simply took it down. And the group started from scratch again sharing information, attracting followers. FB has bias against IVM and pro-vax, the main WHO, UN narrative. Many of my friends who posted articles, charts, graphs that show IVM safety and efficacy, they were suspended by FB. The social media has become a giant corporation that decides what information can be shared and cannot be shared. What narrative should be pushed, contrary opinions and data to be censored.

BWorld 486, What is the optimal energy mix?

* My article in BusinessWorld, May 03, 2021. 
------------

The Department of Energy (DoE) released the Philippines Power Statistics 2020 this week and it shows some interesting data on the country’s energy mix. Installed capacity in 2020 has reached 26,250 megawatts (MW) or 26.25 gigawatts (GW), and the four biggest energy technologies are coal, oil-based, hydro, and natural gas. In actual electricity generation, the four biggest sources are coal, natural gas, geothermal, and hydro (see Table 1).

There are three interesting pieces of data here. One, coal constituted 42% of total installed capacity in 2020 but its actual power generation was 57% of the total. The big increase in coal generation came from the Mindanao grid starting 2016 (double the 2015 level) through 2019 (double the 2016 level). There are no longer daily “Earth Hours” and regular blackouts in Mindanao.

Two, oil-based plants constituted 16% of total installed capacity but contributed only 2.4% of total power generation. This is because they are mostly used as peaking plants, meaning they run only on peak demand hours and days, and are not base load plants running 24/7.

Three, the combined power capacity of biomass, solar, and wind in 2020 was 7.3% of total but their actual power generation was only 3.5% of total. They remain marginal and nearly insignificant power producers after more than a decade since the Renewable Energy (RE) law of 2008 (RA 9513) was enacted.

The anti-coal activists continue to bully the Philippines private energy companies and government agencies even if the Philippines is a minor coal producer compared to many countries. Our 58.2 terawatt-hours (TWH) of coal power generation in 2020 was what Vietnam and Malaysia produced four to five years ago, what Indonesia produced 14 years ago, what Taiwan and South Korea produced 24 and 27 years ago (see Table 2).

 
Last week I saw two press releases gloating over the cancellation of the Redondo Peninsula 600 MW coal project in Subic: 

1. “Green groups hail cancellation of Meralco Subic coal project, ask the same for Atimonan”

2. “Greenpeace to Meralco: drop all dirty energy projects, not just Subic coal plant.”

These are emotional statements based on rhetoric and not on actual energy realities. Here are three reasons why.

One, the anti-coal activists want full decarbonization of Meralco and other energy companies when actual data show that their favorite renewables — biomass, solar, and wind — will only assure us of large-scale blackouts as they contributed only 3.5% of total power generation in 2020.

Two, that Atimonan 1,200 MW ultra-supercritical coal project is a P160-B investment that can create lots of jobs and give the Philippines a very modern, efficient, and stable energy source.

Three, the real “dirty energy” are candles and gensets running on diesel, not coal plants. When you have frequent blackouts, the poor will buy candles (and risk more fires) while the rich will buy more gensets (which are more costly, more polluting).

A friend alerted me to one trend where some legislators become cozy with some rooftop solar companies seeking back channel subsidies in net metering. To avoid indirect subsidies, export energy should be at Wholesale Electricity Spot Market (WESM) rates while net metering customers should pay a minimum distribution charge to cover installed facilities, meter reading, etc.

Finally, here are three recent reports in BusinessWorld that caught my attention:

1. “Gov’t may expand role in power generation to build up reserves” (April 28),

2. “NPC sets minigrid, RE construction target of 5 megawatts this year” (May 2),

3. “House bill seeks to ban cross-ownership in power industry” (May 2).

Report numbers 1 and 2 show that the government may violate the EPIRA law of 2001 (RA 9136) where power generation has been transferred to the private sector to encourage more competition and discourage politics in the sector. Government power companies like the National Power Corp. (NPC) and the Power Sector Assets and Liabilities Management Corp. (PSALM) seem bent on staying around forever instead of fading away under the Electric Power Industry Reform Act (EPIRA).

Report number 3 shows that Bayan Muna continues its abolition-of-the-EPIRA agenda. A distribution utility can own power plants not necessarily to serve its needs but to supply power to various retail electricity suppliers (RES), electric cooperatives in other provinces.

EPIRA is not perfect but it remains a beautiful law. There is a clear division of function between the private sector as power generators and RES, and the government as regulator of power supply agreements and power pricing.

An optimal energy mix is one determined by the energy consumers themselves like the 2020 generation mix. Not by the government and legislators, not by leftist political parties like Bayan Muna, not by anti-coal activists who want to kill coal power competition and push RE favoritism and big gas companies shrewdly hiding behind a climate smokescreen.
---------------

See also:
BWorld 483, Aging power plants and economic growth, April 15, 2021 
BWorld 484, Earth Day, Greenpeace and the RE lobby, April 22, 2021 
BWorld 485, 10 reasons to lift the lockdown, April 30, 2021.

Covid 34, Drs. Romy Quijano and Iggy Agbayani on IVM

May 04, 2021

From Dr. Romeo Quijano, retired Professor of UP College of Medicine. He was Doc Iggy Agbayani's former teacher at UPCM and Doc Iggy shared this in the CDC PH group:

Ivermectin oral preparation is listed in the Philippine Formulary of Essential Drugs 7th edition(2008) which contained detailed information. It was listed under the section "PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS IN THE PNDF THAT ARE NOT PRESENTLY AVAILABLE IN THE MARKET BUT ARE CONSIDERED ESSENTIAL". The Formulary does not restrict the use of any drug to any specific disease. However, in the simplified 8th edition (2017) of the formulary, much of the detailed information in the 7th edition was missing and apparently, the list contained only available products. Ivermectin was no longer in the simplified list. According to the FDA, the ivermectin manufacturer (Merck) did not renew the registration of their product (oral formulation for human use).  The FDA argues that there is no more oral ivermectin product registered for human consumption and therefore any ivermectin oral preparation being used or prescribed is illegal.  At the same time, the FDA says that a duly licensed pharmacist can “compound” or prepare an ivermectin oral formulation if prescribed by a duly licensed physician but this was contradicted by the DOH spokesperson and the medical societies.

However, clearly stated in ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER 0024 (June 16, 2016), on the Institutionalization of the Inter-Agency Advisory Council for the Implementation of Republic Act No. 9502 otherwise known as the"Universally Accessible Cheaper and Quality Medicines Act of2008", an essential drug is "selected based on the evidence of  their efficacy, safety and comparative cost-effectiveness. These medicines shall be made available and affordable at all times”. Since ivermectin is an essential drug, the  government is obligated to make it "available and affordable at all times". The fact that a specific ivermectin product of a particular manufacturer is no longer available in the market does not invalidate the listing  of ivermectin as an essential drug since the listing does not refer to any specific product of a manufacturer.

Even granting (without admitting, of course) that ivermectin is unproven, under this pandemic, the physician is ethically bound to prescribe ivermectin to his patient. The World Medical Association  Helsinki Declaration says that “In the treatment of an individual patient, where proven interventions do not exist or other known interventions have been ineffective, the physician, after seeking expert advice, with informed consent from the patient or a legally authorised representative, may use an unproven intervention if in the physician’s judgement it offers hope of saving life, re-establishing health or alleviating suffering.”
-----------------

May 05, 2021

To my compatriots,

I am making an urgent appeal for all us to actively engage those who would like to stifle our voices and stop the access of our people to IVERMECTIN. There is a grand scheme to stop the supply of, probably, the only drug which could help us end this pandemic and improve our current circumstance. The recent statements of the Philippine Medical Association, the Philippine College of Physicians, the DOH and the FDA to revoke our licenses for prescribing IVERMECTIN  is doing the rounds in social media. Likewise, the compounding laboratories and the act of distribution are being questioned and may be stopped in the near future. 

I ask that we actively ENGAGE them, REACT and MAKE OUR VOICES BE HEARD. Money is being funneled in the social media platforms so that those of us offering prevention and cure will be drowned out with their propaganda in the hope that what we offer will be disposed of with certainty. Just type IVERMECTIN and you will see all the news reports which I hope you will take time to challenge those who malign us.

What we lack in power, money and resources, we overcome with common sense, sincerity and the grace of the Almighty. We are fighting for the lives of our families and of our people - there is nothing more NOBLE than that. Salamat po.

Dr. Iggy Agbayani
President
Concerned Doctors and Citizens of the Philippines (CDC PH)
----------

Below are some of the slides of Doc Iggy in his many lectures.

--------------

See also:
Covid 30, Dr. Romeo Quijano on IVM and vaccine mania, April 11, 2021.
Covid 31, Articles arguing for lifting the PH lockdown, April 18, 2021 
Covid 32, Continuing economic damage of indefinite lockdown, April 23, 2021 
Covid 33, CDC PH statement on lifting the lockdown, April 28, 2021.