Mining 14: Teddy Casino's Environmentalism

Yesterday, Teddy Casino, Senatorial candidate of Bayan Muna/Makabayan Coalition, posted this in his facebook page,

We recently challenged provisions of the Mining Act of 1995 in court.

Ang pagmimina ay dapat bahagi ng isang National Industrialization Policy para matiyak na napapakinabangan ng mga Pilipino ang ating yamang mineral, at minimal ang negatibong epekto nito sa kapaligiran at mga komunidad.
Read the full statement: http://ow.ly/k6Ibm 

http://www.teddycasino.org/casino-supreme-court-should-strike-down-flawed-1995-mining-law/

I commented on it, I wrote that “Government collects about 43% of the net revenues of big metallic mining firms. But government collects zero from small-scale metallic mining, and 9% from net revenues of non-metallic mining firms, http://funwithgovernment.blogspot.com/2013/03/mining-7-mining-taxation-and-government.html”

A supporter of Casino defended him, below are our exchanges:

Leon Dulce Para-Sa Kalikasan But its contribution overall is only 0.91% to GDP, 2.5% in total investments and 0.38% to total employment. At hindi lang taxation ang usapin sa large-scale mining.
http://www.businessmirror.com.ph/index.php/news/nation/10114-mining-act-assailed-by-ngos-anew

Nonoy Oplas The contribution of mining to GDP is similar to raw agriculture. Chicken sold at wholesale price would cost only about P100 each on average, that's the agri share to GDP. When the same chicken is sold as litson manok and sold at P212 (Andok's or Baliwag litson), the P112 value added is counted as service sector share to GDP.

Copper, nickel, iron, when sold as ordinary stones or soil, is priced relatively low. But without these mineral products, there will be no construction and steel industry, no electricity and power industry, no tv/cellphones/radio/various electronics industry.

Leon Dulce Para-Sa Kalikasan Minerals are finite and should be utilized based only on the needs of the people, with the environmental and socio-economic concerns of communities in mind, and with a national industrialization plan in mind.

But as it stands, ores and huge profits are exported while the people are left with literally crumbs. And poison. Look at Padcal Mines in Benguet. Look at Citinickel Mines in Palawan. These are just recent cases. Paano yung long-standing and unresolved like Marcopper?

Mining by TNCs are not bringing in the revenue and safety as advertised. Mining should the public's, no one else.

Please read the article linked above in sir Teddy's caption before rehashing the tired, old lines about "no laptops if no mining."

Nonoy Oplas I read Casino's statement and it's lousy. As I noted above, tax payment by small scale metallic mining in 2010 was zero vs. P12 billion by big metallic mining, constituting 43% of their net revenues. Why is Casino silent on zero taxes, all extraction only by so-called "small scale" mining but are actually "big politicians mining".

Mineral deposits are infinite. Magma, gases and geological movement from the planet's core to the mantle up to the crust, mineralizes ordinary rocks and soil. That is why countries in the Pacific Rim of Fire have more mineral deposits than those in Africa, Europe, S. America and N. America atlantic side. A mining engineer from UP Diliman showed slides about this, http://funwithgovernment.blogspot.com/2013/03/mining-8-supreme-court-hearing-on-ra.html

Leon Dulce Para-Sa Kalikasan Ooh, geologists and mining engineers! Let's wait for the millions of years needed to renew minerals through the continental drift. In the meantime, let's be contented with the poverty incidences that remain highest in mining-affected communities, according to UPSE economists.

Lousy.

Nonoy Oplas I saw Rio Tuba Nickel Mining in southern Palawan. That small barrio has more shops, more cemented roads, wide street lights, a La Salle-administered private elementary and high school and it's free for all of its students, a modern private hospital and it's free for all patients. So the "poverty incidences that remain highest in mining-affected communities" is fiction story by some emotional environmentalists. A few kilometers outside Brgy Rio Tuba, even in the municipal proper of Bataraza, there is more poverty, more unemployment, zero hospital available. See the photos and you will fume more 

http://funwithgovernment.blogspot.com/2013/03/mining-8-rio-tuba-mining-in-south.html

Mining 7: Mining Taxation and Government

* This is my 3rd guest post in antipinoy.com.
----------

The large-scale mining sector  is probably the most taxed sector in the country. National taxes and fees include corporate income tax, tax on stockholders dividends (local and foreign),  excise tax, value added tax (VAT), capital gains tax, documentary stamp tax, tax on bank interest, tax on interest payment for foreign loans, vehicle registration tax, import tax for mining equipment and heavy machineries,  royalties to indigenous communities, mine tailing fees and occupation fees.

Local taxes include community tax, business permit tax, real property tax, registration fees, occupation fees, other taxes and fees.

In addition, big mining companies are also expected to provide various hard and social infrastructures to the residents and workers of the mining area, on top of the various taxes and fees to the national and local governments.

In contrast, the small-scale  mining enterprises are minimally  taxed and regulated.  

On top of these, there were a few recent moves by the government that expands the taxation base of big mining companies. One is the draft scheme by the Mining Industry Coordinating Council (MICC) through the Department of Finance and the Department of Environment and Natural Resources where big mining companies will be taxed twice, first on the gross revenue and second, on the end of year net income.

The other is the Revenue Memorandum Circular (RMC) No. 17-2013 dated February 15, 2013, saying that companies under the Financial or Technical Assistance Agreement (FTAA) must pay taxes throughout the duration of their contract with the government, and not just after the cost recovery period as provided under RA 7942 or the Philippine Mining Act of 1995.

These new revenue measures are created to further tax the sector which many people believe is “not taxed enough” yet and hence, endangers the environment.

Let us review how valid is this statement.

In 2010, the different players in the mining sector paid P13.4 billion in various taxes and fees to the government. There are different interpretations of what this figure represents as share of the government, local and national.

The three tables below collapsed into one image are from Dr. Artemio F. Disini, Chairman of the Chamber of Mines of the Philippines (CMP) in his paper, Getting a Fair Share: The Industry Perspective on Mining Taxation, presented at the Philippine Economic Society (PES) 50^th Annual Conference last  November 27, 2012, held at the PICC, Manila.

I attended that conference and the panel on mining taxation. The other speakers in the panel were Shanaka Peiris, IMF Resident Representative to the Philippines, Tristan Canare of the Asian Institute of Management (AIM), and Donna Gasgonia of the UNDP.

Dr. Disini was saying that the actual contribution of the large scale metallic mining industry to the government coffers was not just 9 percent but 13 percent of gross value production, as the small scale mining (SSM) sub-sector does not pay any taxes, at least to the national government.

After deduction of production cost, 60 percent for metallic and 50 percent for non-metallic, the total taxes, fees and royalties paid to the government of P11.9 billion in 2010 comprised 43 percent of the large scale mining companies’ net revenue.

This government share of nearly P12 billion in 2010 alone and constituting nearly one-half of big mining companies’ net revenue is big. It is hard to find other sectors that are taxed this much.

Thus, the statement that large scale mining is “not taxed enough” is not valid.

For one, humanity benefits from mining because no mining and mineral products means no modern life. From spoon and fork, nails and hammer, cellphones and laptops, cars and airplanes, engines and buildings, all of these came from mining. A mining expert Kennedy “Kori” Coronel aptly put it this way: “Everything that humanity needs that cannot be grown, must be mined.”

So, a “No to mining whatsoever” statement is a non-option. A corollary statement “tax mining as prohibitively as possible” is next to non-option as this will drive the legal, large and responsible mining companies and leave the country’s mineral resources to the guerilla type small-scale mining enterprises that are hardly taxed and regulated.

The appropriate attitude for government and the rest of society is to keep taxation at the minimum and go for full transparency and accountability of all mining companies, from small to medium to large firms. Putting strict regulations and high taxes only to large players but allowing small players that are often owned or protected by local politicians to disobey those regulations do more harm than good, to the environment, economy and society.

---------------

See also:
Fat-Free Econ 3: Mining and Environmentalism, March 15, 2012
Mining 3: Debates on Mining, March 17, 2012
Mining 4: EO 79 and the MICC, July 12, 2012
Mining 5: Benefits of Mining Even Without Taxes, December 09, 2012
Mining 6: Large Investments vs. Large Bureaucracies, February 19, 2013