Thursday, March 07, 2019

BWorld 300, IPR, innovation and growth

* This is my article in BusinessWorld on March 05, 2019.


“The natural effort of every individual to better his own condition…is so powerful, that it is alone, and without any assistance, not only capable of carrying on the society to wealth and prosperity, but of surmounting a hundred impertinent obstructions with which the folly of human laws too often encumbers its operations.”

— Adam Smith, Book IV, Chapter V, The Wealth of Nations (1776).

The ideas of Adam Smith, John Locke and other classical liberals were indirectly discussed in the various panel discussions during the Asia Liberty Forum (ALF) held in Hilton Colombo, Sri Lanka last week February 28 to March 1. The ALF was mainly sponsored by Atlas (USA) and Advocata (Sri Lanka), with co-sponsorship by the Friedrich Naumann Foundation for Freedom (FNF) and other groups. FNF is a German foundation whose main work around the world is to help promote the value of economic freedom, free markets, human rights and political diversity.

The last panel on Day 2 was on “IPR for Innovation and Economic Growth” and speakers were Lorenzo Montanari of the Property Rights Alliance (PRA, USA), Philip Stevens of Geneva Network (UK), and Rainer Heufers of Center for Indonesian Policy Studies (CIPS). The panel was moderated by Harith de Mel of Advocata.

Mr. Montanari showed the three components of the International Property Rights Index (IPRI) — legal and political environment, physical property, and intellectual property — and the results of the 2018 Report. He emphasized the role of institutional arrangements and property rights protection in building a free, productive, prosperous and inclusive societies.

Mr. Stevens presented “The knowledge economy as a driver of sustainable economic development.” He showed data on the components of S&P 500 market value, the rising share of intangible assets vs tangible assets as follows: 17% vs 83% in 1975, 68% vs 32% in 1995, and 84% vs 16% in 2015. He further observed that “One third of the value of manufactured products sold around the world comes from ‘intangible’ capital.”

And Mr. Heufers observed that “For Indonesia to be free and prosperous” in the agriculture and food sector, the adoption of modern rice varieties protected by IPR has contributed significantly to greater food production in the country.

Let us review some numbers. Data below are from three sources. (1) IPRI Report http://internationalpropertyrightsindex.org/, (2) Global Innovation Index (GII) 2018 report, produced by the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), INSEAD, and Cornel SC Johnson College of Business, http://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo_pub_gii_2018.pdf, and (3) IMF World Economic Outlook (WEO) October 2018.


Notice the top seven countries and economies — they have higher global ranking in property rights protection, also in innovation index, and higher per capita income of at least $8,600 in 2017, higher sustained economic growth.

The Philippines has low rank in both IPRI and GII and low per capita income. Improving the country’s global ranking and score in at least these two reports will send a good signal to both local and foreign investors and traders, that their investments and branding here will be respected and protected.

There are efforts in Asia though to circumvent IPR protection. Like moves to issue compulsory licensing (CL) and kill the patents of newly-invented and successful medicines. Or impose plain packaging and kill trademarks and brands of certain products deemed “unhealthy” like tobacco, soda and sugary foods.

These anti-IPR moves downgrade the fact that people in general are living longer, healthier and freer. Life expectancy at birth keeps rising, mortality rate across ages keeps declining, and people engaged in “dangerous” hobbies and sports like sky jumping, downhill cycling and motorcycle stunts is rising. Threat on companies’ IPR on their invention and corporate branding is also a threat on the overall investment environment. Governments should avoid such populist and anti-liberal policies.
---------------

See also: 

Wednesday, March 06, 2019

Inequality 38, Forbes' billionaires 2019

Forbes magazine released yesterday its annual report, Forbes top billionaires, https://www.forbes.com/billionaires/#5577002a251c.

The socialists, Oxfam and other organizations, leaders are salivating at their endless plan to go after these wealth and money via more taxation.

Here are the top billionaires and Forbes' brief description of their businesses.



#1 Jeff Bezos & family
CEO and Founder, Amazon
2019 NET WORTH, $131B as of 3/5/19

Founded e-commerce colossus Amazon in 1994 out of his garage in Seattle. He remains CEO and owns a 16% stake.
In 2018, Amazon pulled in $230 billion in revenues and a record $10 billion in net profit, up from $3 billion the prior year.
In February, Amazon announced it was canceling plans for a second headquarters in Long Island City, New York after local lawmakers opposed the plan.
Bezos owns The Washington Post and Blue Origin, an aerospace company that is developing a rocket for commercial use.

#2 Bill Gates
Cofounder, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
2019 NET WORTH, $96.5B as of 3/5/19

With his wife Melinda, Bill Gates chairs the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the world's largest private charitable foundation.
The foundation works to save lives and improve global health, and is working with Rotary International to eliminate polio.
Gates has sold or given away much of his stake in Microsoft -- he owns just over 1% of shares --and invested in a mix of stocks and other assets.
He remains a board member of Microsoft, the software firm he founded with Paul Allen in 1975.
In late 2016, Gates announced the launch of a $1 billion Breakthrough Energy investment fund with about 20 other people.
To date, Gates has donated $35.8 billion worth of Microsoft stock to the Gates Foundation.

#3 Warren Buffett
CEO, Berkshire Hathaway
2019 NET WORTH, $82.5B as of 3/5/19

Buffett runs Berkshire Hathaway, which owns more than 60 companies, including insurer Geico, battery maker Duracell and restaurant chain Dairy Queen.
The son of a U.S. congressman, he first bought stock at age 11 and first filed taxes at age 13.
He's promised to give away over 99% of his fortune. In 2018 he donated $3.4 billion, much of it to the foundation of friends Bill and Melinda Gates.
In 2010, he and Gates launched the Giving Pledge, asking billionaires to commit to donating half their wealth to charitable causes.

#4 Bernard Arnault & family
Chairman and CEO, LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton
2019 NET WORTH, $76B as of 3/5/19

Bernard Arnault oversees an empire of 70 brands including Louis Vuitton and Sephora.
His luxury goods group, LVMH, posted record sales and profits in 2018, thanks in part to increased spending by Chinese customers.
His daughter Delphine is executive vice president of Louis Vuitton, and a member of LVMH's executive committee.
His father made a small fortune in construction; Arnault put up $15 million from that business to buy Christian Dior in 1985.

#5 Carlos Slim Helu & family
Honorary Chairman, América Móvil
2019 NET WORTH, $64B as of 3/5/19

Mexico's richest man, Carlos Slim Helu and his family control America Movil, Latin America's biggest mobile telecom firm.
With foreign telecom partners, Slim bought a stake in Telmex, Mexico's only phone company, in 1990. Telmex is now part of America Movil.
He also owns stakes in Mexican construction, consumer goods, mining and real estate companies and 17% of The New York Times.

#6 Amancio Ortega
2019 NET WORTH, $62.7B as of 3/5/19

One of the richest men in Europe and the wealthiest retailer in the world.
A pioneer in fast fashion, he cofounded Inditex, known for its Zara fashion chain, with his ex-wife Rosalia Mera (d. 2013) in 1975.
He owns about 60% of Madrid-listed Inditex, which has 8 brands, including Massimo Dutti and Pull & Bear, and 7,500 stores around the world.
Ortega typically earns more than $400 million in dividends a year.
He has invested his dividends primarily into real estate in Madrid, Barcelona, London, Chicago, Miami and New York.

#7 Larry Ellison
CTO and Founder, Oracle
2019 NET WORTH, $62.5B as of 3/5/19

Cofounded software firm Oracle in 1977 to tap into the growing need for customer relationship management databases.
He gave up the Oracle CEO role in 2014 but still serves as chairman of the board and chief technology officer.
As part of Oracle's push into cloud computing, it acquired cloud-software firm Netsuite for $9.3 billion in 2016.
In May 2016, Ellison pledged $200 million to the University of Southern California for a cancer treatment center.
In March 2018, Ellison launched a wellness startup called Sensei, whose first project is hydroponic farming on the Hawaiian island Lanai.
Ellison joined Tesla's board in December 2018, after purchasing 3 million Tesla shares earlier that year.

#8 Mark Zuckerberg
Cofounder, Chairman and CEO, Facebook
2019 NET WORTH, $62.3B as of 3/5/19

After facing another year of criticism for fake news and abuse on Facebook, CEO Mark Zuckerberg said his priority in 2019 is tackling social issues.
In April 2018, he testified before Congress after it was revealed that Facebook shared users' data with political consulting firm Cambridge Analytica.
Zuckerberg started Facebook at Harvard in 2004 at the age of 19 for students to match names with faces in class.
He took Facebook public in May 2012 and still owns nearly 17% of the stock.
In December 2015, Zuckerberg and his wife, Priscilla Chan, pledged to give away 99% of their Facebook stake over their lifetimes.

#9 Michael Bloomberg
CEO, Bloomberg
2019 NET WORTH, $55.5B as of 3/5/19

Cofounded financial information and media company Bloomberg LP in 1981.
He put in the seed funding for the company and now owns 88% of the business, which has revenues north of $9 billion.
Bloomberg got his start on Wall Street in 1966 with an entry level job at investment bank Salomon Brothers. He was fired 15 years later.
An active philanthropist, he has donated more than $5 billion to gun control, climate change and other causes.
He plans to spend at least $500 million to defeat Donald Trump in 2020.

#10 Larry Page
CEO, Alphabet
2019 NET WORTH, $50.8B as of 3/5/19

Sits at the helm of Alphabet, the parent company of Google, healthcare division Calico, smart home appliance division Nest and more.
He cofounded Google in 1998 with fellow Stanford Ph.D. student Sergey Brin.
With Brin, Page invented Google's PageRank algorithm, which powers the search engine.
Page was Google's first CEO until 2001. After serving as president of products, he took the CEO job again in 2011.


For the Philippines, here are the wealthiest individuals and families, 2019 list.


The Sy family was #1 in 2018 with $18.3 B networth. Perhaps stung by the politics of envy, they "chop-chopped" their wealth and now none is in the top 5.

Also not in the top 10 of 2019 list is Jaime Zobel de Ayala, #4 in 2018 with $4.0 B, and George Ty and family, 9th in 2018 with $2.75 B.

Oxfam and other emotionalists would complain endlessly why there are many billionaires when so many people are poor. The poor will become middle class or become rich if those billionaires and their products and services -- like google, blogger, facebook, youtube, iphone, etc -- don't exist? Lousy minds those emotionalists.
------------------

See also:

On 'corrosive' China capital in the PH

Last February 21, 2019, Stratbase ADR Institute (ADRi) hosted a RTD with Alvin Camba at the Tower Club, Makati City. Alvin is a PhD Candidate,  Department of Sociology at the John Hopkins University (US) and a non-resident fellow at the Stratbase ADR Institute. He presented his paper, "Corrosive Capital: The Political Economy of Chinese Investments in the Philippines."


Below from left: Dindo Manhit, President of Stratbase ADR Institute; Dr. Rene de Castro, Trustee and Program Convenor of the National Security and East Asian Affairs of the institute, Alvin Camba, me as another non-resident fellow of the institute. Rene and myself were the reactors that afternoon.



Other participants, mostly from the diplomatic camp.


All photos from ADRi facebook page. Thank you.

Related: BWorld 298, Trump-Kim summit, implications for ASEAN and China.

BWorld 299, Capitalism and freedom in Asia

* This is my article in BusinessWorld last Friday, March 01, 2019.


“The over-all speed of advance will be increased by those who move fastest. Even if many fall behind at first, the cumulative effect of the preparation of the path will, before long, sufficiently facilitate their advance that they will be able to keep their place in the march.”

— Friedrich Hayek,
Chapter 5, The Constitution of Liberty (1960)

Colombo, Sri Lanka — The annual Asia Liberty Forum (ALF) 2019 conference is held this week February 28 to March 1 in this South Asian country. To discuss and promote capitalism and free market policies may look ironic in a country that is officially named “Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka.” Yet this country has more pro-market policies than many supposedly capitalist Asian economies.

The ALF is mainly sponsored by the Atlas Network in the US, and co-sponsored by a local free market think tank or institute in the host country. In Sri Lanka, the local host is Advocata Institute, a newly-formed and dynamic institute. Among the co-sponsors are the Friedrich Naumann Foundation for Freedom (FNF, Germany) and Action Institute (US).

On Day 1, February 28, one of the cool plenary discussions was “The Future of Capitalism and Freedom in Asia.” Speakers were Prof. Razeen Sally (National University of Singapore), Prof. Pratap Bhanu Mehta (Vice-Chancellor at Ashoka University, India), and Fraser Howie (Author and Independent Analyst, Singapore), Dr. Christer Ljungwall (ENC Center for Global Affairs, Sweden) and Dr. Ganeshan Wignaraja (Lakshman Kadirgamar Institute of International Relations and Strategic Studies, Sri Lanka).

The theme was inspired by the economist Milton Friedman’s 1962 book, Capitalism and Freedom, wherein he argued that economic freedom is both a necessary and sufficient condition for political freedom.

When I arrived on a midnight at Bandaranaike International Airport, 30-plus kilometers from Colombo’s city proper, I was surprised to find a huge airport, with thousands of passengers arriving and departing in that late hour. Perhaps as busy or busier than Manila’s three international terminals combined.

To see the challenge of more capitalism and market-oriented policies in Asia, I checked some macroeconomic data, focused on the six South Asian and six ASEAN economies with similar populations. I excluded Singapore, being an outlier as it is a very developed economy, also Thailand (69.3M), Myanmar (54.3M), Malaysia (32.4M).

Sri Lanka has a modest GDP size and its per capita income of $4,073 in 2017 is actually higher than that of the Philippines’ $2,989. But it does not attract much foreign direct investments (FDI) compared to socialist Vietnam or even Cambodia (see table).


So, many Asian economies are still ideologically and economically challenged to optimize their potentials under capitalism, market-oriented and globally-integrated policies – what Singapore, Hong Kong, South Korea, Taiwan, and Japan have achieved.

The fetish on anti-inequality, forced equality and anti-private property, a soft and implicit advocacy for socialism that Friedrich Hayek has warned, should be secondary to the goal of fighting poverty via more free enterprise, more economic freedom.

It is good that Atlas continues the global and continental discussions on the subject, and it is equally kind for FNF to help the free market groups, institutes and individuals in Asia. My participation in the ALF is made possible by the support of FNF from 2016 (Kuala Lumpur), 2017 (Mumbai), 2018 (Jakarta) to this year in Colombo. FNF also sponsored my participation in almost all EFN annual conferences and meetings in many Asian cities from 2004 to 2017.

A key staff member of the FNF in organizing the annual EFN conferences before and now co-sponsoring the ALF is its Project Director, Pett Jarupaiboon. Pett is a cool, warm, behind-the-scenes guy who ensures that things run as smoothly as possible. Now Pett is leaving the FNF next month to pursue another career and finish a PhD program.

Hats off, Pett and FNF. You are doing good in helping Asia and its billions of people realize the value of economic freedom and, over the long term, attain more wealth and prosperity.
----------------

See also: 

Tuesday, March 05, 2019

Climate Tricks 77, Stop human reproduction to 'fight' CC

This is one more proof that extreme climate alarmism can make people become idiots, and they proudly announce the idiocy.

Some reports two weeks ago:

Ocasio-Cortez: People Maybe Shouldn’t Reproduce Due To Climate Change
"Is it okay to still have children?"
By RYAN SAAVEDRA   February 25, 2019

Ocasio-Cortez asks if climate change means we should stop having kids
By Bob Fredericks February 25, 2019 | 2:37pm

ALEXANDRIA OCASIO-CORTEZ ASKS: IS IT STILL OK TO HAVE KIDS IN FACE OF CLIMATE CHANGE?
BY NICOLE GOODKIND ON 2/25/19 AT 10:34 AM

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez says it is 'legitimate' for young people to ask if they should have children because of the threat of climate change
By EMILY GOODIN, U.S. POLITICAL REPORTER FOR DAILYMAIL.COM
PUBLISHED: 20:12 GMT, 25 February 2019 | UPDATED: 05:10 GMT, 26 February 2019

Democrats unwilling to stand up to Ocasio-Cortez, 'tell her no,' Rush Limbaugh says
By Victor Garcia | Fox News   Published February 25

Ocasio-Cortez: Probably time to stop having kids because 'there's scientific consensus that the lives of children will be very difficult'
By Thomas Lifson  February 25, 2019

Nation Breathes Sigh Of Relief As Ocasio-Cortez Comes Out Against Having Children
February 25th, 2019

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez To Green New Deal Haters: ‘I’m The Boss. How ‘Bout That?’
charles the moderator / 1 week ago February 24, 2019
----------------

See also: 
Climate Tricks 74, People should eat insects to fight CC? October 29, 2018 
Climate Tricks 75, Brazil President Borsonaro is 'threat' to the planet? November 16, 2018 

Climate Tricks 76, Greenpeace deception model, December 23, 2018

Monday, March 04, 2019

BWorld 298, Trump-Kim summit, implications for ASEAN and China

* This is my column in BusinessWorld last February 27, 2019.


The second Trump-Kim Summit in Vietnam this week, February 27-28, points to many good and optimistic scenarios not only for both US and N. Korea but also for the ASEAN, East Asia and the rest of the world.

The first Trump-Kim summit last June 2018 was held in Singapore. Mr. Kim Jong Un (KJU) and N. Korea officials saw there that even a small country with just 5.7M people, very poor until the early ‘60s when it was kicked out of the Malaysia federation, and no nukes but market-and globally-integrated can become so prosperous and politically-respected worldwide.

KJU went to Vietnam (VN) last Monday or two days before the summit and had talks with officials there. VN is indeed a perfect venue for the summit and for KJU to learn lessons for at least six reasons.

(1) VN is politically socialist, a one-party state but economically capitalist, (2) VN was very poor until 1975 when the devastating Vietnam War ended then managed to grow fast via market-oriented reforms like privatization of many state enterprises and trade liberalization, zero tariff with ASEAN neighbors, (3) VN was a former US enemy and later embraced the US as economic and military partner, (4) VN has no nukes yet politically secure, (5) VN is not far from Pyongyang, perhaps only 4 hours by plane, and (6) VN is an ASEAN member like Singapore, the association is 3rd biggest consumer bloc in the world (about 650M consumers) with many friends all over the world.

Let us go back a few decades and see what N. Korea has missed all these years by being a hermit-like economy. A mid-point 1995 is included below because that’s the year where (1) Vietnam normalized ties with the US, and (2) WTO was created that year and global trade has improved. Data are from the World Bank’s World Development Indicators (WDI) and the IMF’s World Economic Outlook (WEO) but both institutions do not have data for N. Korea. The multiples are computed from the GDP size (see table).


So what N.Korea missed: (1) Fast growth of S. Korea for 3.5 decades, economy expanded about 140x from 1960 to 1995, (2) From 1995 to 2010 or just 1.5 decades, China economy expanded 8.2x while VN economy expanded 5.4x, and (3) sustained growth until 2017, China and Vietnam economy expanded 2x in seven years.

So while N.Korea denuclearization will be the center of the Trump-Kim meeting, a second most important topic will be the transition of N. Korea to VN-like economy. And in the process, to reduce dependence from China which has growing toxic relations with many neighbors like Japan, Taiwan, S. Korea, India, Vietnam and Philippines.

Speaking of this topic, Stratbase-Albert del Rosario Institute (ADRi) organized a forum on “Corrosive Capital? The Political Economy of Chinese Foreign Investments in the Philippines” last week February 21 at the Tower Club, Makati. The speaker was Alvin Camba, a PhD Sociology candidate at Johns Hopkins University. Reactors were Dr. Rene de Castro of DLSU and myself.

Alvin said, “Current iterations of Chinese foreign capital is corrosive, bypasses and transforms pre-existing procedures, concentrates profits in specific groups, and strengthens and generates new patronage networks.”

I agree with that assessment. I cited the case of the Kaliwa Dam project, originally an integrated PPP but later converted to hybrid PPP by the Duterte administration upon the lobbying of China capital (China Eximbank) and contractors. Now Filipino taxpayers are indebted to China by at least P18B in this project alone when there should be no foreign loan if the original integrated PPP scheme was allowed.

I am not familiar how China companies, private and state-owned, deal with N. Korea enterprises but from various reports of how China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) has trapped several poor countries to huge debt, it is safe to assume that N. Korea economy is controlled and restricted by China.

So a successful N. Korea transition to VN-like economy will see a good and promising outlook for the region and the world in at least three ways: (1) Soon Starbucks, McDonald’s, Marriott, Google, Apple and other American brands, also Toyota, Hyundai, Samsung and other Asian and global brands will be in N. Korea and its 26M consumers. (2) S. Korea with 51M consumers can then reduce its defense spending and use more public resources for inter-Korean industrialization, and (3) a N. Korea-ASEAN FTA may not be farfetched as KJU has become more familiar and comfortable with VN and Singapore.
-----------------

See also: 

Inequality 37, Freebies forever

Free education until university, free healthcare via UHC, free cash transfer, free condoms and pills, free housing for the poor, wow. Next will be free iPads, free flat tv, free cars for the poor. The PH is turning socialistic, legislators and politicians do not have to think, just promise "free ____ for the poor", endless and no timetable. Consultants and academics (so many of them now) provide the studies to support and justify all freebies. Taxpayers are bottomless milking cows, and if they protest they are heartless and greedy for wanting to keep more of their earnings.

See these two reports:

(1) New department eyes ₱1-trillion budget, squatter housing focus
February 25, 2019 | 10:26 pm

“’…we are envisioning to have a budget of P50 billion per year for 20 years; because to construct 2 million housing units, we need P1 trillion more or less. In the next four to 20 years, we are targeting that,” Mr. Del Rosario explained.”

(2) House adopts Senate version of proposed cash transfer law
February 25, 2019 | 10:24 pm

“The cash transfers will be provided for a maximum of seven years, but may be extended upon the recommendation of the National Advisory Council….
If enacted, the DSWD will grant the following cash transfers to beneficiaries: at least P300 per month per child enrolled in day care and elementary school and at least P500 per month for a 10-month school year for those in junior high school.

Students enrolled in senior high school are entitled to a cash transfer not lower than P700 per month. Currently, education grants range only from P300-500. The education grant may be given to up to three children, aged 3-18 years old, in every household.”

Education socialists, healthcare socialists, ecological socialists, housing socialists, they expand fast. Save the planet, save the poor, save the dolphins -- but what they don't admit is "save our pockets, we need endless bureauacracies, pork barrel and endless consulting rackets."

The UHC will never have enough money. P200 B a year, P500 B a year, won't be enough. When a service is given for free or highly-subsidized, expect that demand will be larger than supply. Always, 101%. Healthcare, education, ecological and housing socialists will always demand "trillions more... forever."

Meanwhile, we may have exagerrated the role of politicians. We have underrated the role of consultants and academics, the role of multilaterals (UN, WB, IMF, ADB,...), the role of big NGOs, the role of mainstream media -- in justifying all sorts of freebies forever. The politicians happily listen to them then legislate all sorts of freebies, all sorts of taxes to finance their freebies. Income tax, consumption tax, franchise tax, property tax, vehicle tax, travel tax, oil tax, coal tax, tobacco tax, alcohol tax, sugar tax, soon bacon tax, candies tax, burger tax,...

Pwede pakuya-kuyakoy, painom-inom, sugal-sugal regularly and do little or no work. Or work 6 days a week but also drink and party 6 nights a week with zero savings. Only very few things are personal and parental responsibility, they are now state responsibility. Tamad or masipag, magastos or matipid, pare-pareho lang kakain, may free education till college, may free housing, free healthcare, ayos na ayos. Lots of incentives for people who declare themselves as poor. 
---------------

See also:

Sunday, March 03, 2019

BWorld 297, The economics of coal power

* This is my article in BusinessWorld last February 25, 2019.


Most anti-coal activists would resort to disinformation and deception to advance their ecological leftist agenda and in the process, deprive energy consumers of the opportunity to have cheaper, stable and reliable 24/7 electricity, badly needed to sustain fast growth and generate more jobs for the people.

One paper spreading fake news is an opinion piece, “Consumers should not pay the price for risky coal deals” by Sara Jane Ahmed published in BusinessWorld last week, February 20, 2019. I quote three of her statements.

(1) “Coal has become toxic… In India, China, Malaysia, and, most recently, Vietnam, a trend of cancellations and delays involving new coal plants has emerged.”

Coal remains attractive not only for the four countries mentioned but other major economies in the world, including “greenies” US, Germany, Australia and Japan. Until 2017, these four developed countries were reliant on coal power from 31% to 61% of their total electricity generation. For India, China, Malaysia and Vietnam, coal reliance was 45% to 76%. In the Asia-Pacific overall, coal supplied 60% of total electricity production.


The real “toxic energy” would be candles and gensets because of frequent blackouts. Candles mean more fires and destruction of property while gensets running on diesel mean more air and noise pollution.

(2) “SMC Global Power Holdings Corp., plans to forge ahead with the construction of a 300-megawatt (MW) coal plant in Negros Occidental…. insurance and reinsurance companies… will no longer insure coal.”

San Miguel Energy sees the power deficiency in Negros so its main insurance for building a coal plant is that its output will be quickly used by the 5M consumers (4.4M in 2015) as electricity demand keeps rising.

The main source of electricity in Negros is geothermal from Palinpinon, Negros Oriental (by EDC). Before and even after the many solar farms were constructed in Negros, regular and rotating blackout was the norm.

Luckily there are saviours somewhere — the coal plants from Cebu (Toledo and Naga). Negros imports energy from Cebu which has similar population as Negros but power generation is nearly 2x that of Negros. An anti-coal ideologue opposing a new coal plant in Negros but silent about coal plants in Cebu and Iloilo that give lights to Negros.


(3) “coal as it becomes “stranded”… happening with increasing regularity to coal plants, including those from our neighboring countries, which are becoming obsolete in the face of cheaper renewables…”

Dr. James Roumasset, a famous environmental and energy economist from the University of Hawaii and frequent visitor and writer in Philippines economics events, made this observation:

“If stranded costs are really happening with regularity, it’s because of uneconomic mandates and subsidies favoring renewables. In California, this is called the “missing money” problem. But a more accurate term would be “stolen money.” Those “progressive policies” rob from the IPPs and poor consumers and give (a far lesser amount) to rich consumers who can afford panels and to politically well-connected renewable providers.”

The Arangkada Philippines Project (TAPP) in its paper, “Seven Big Winner Sectors: Power” made a good Recommendation #12, “Develop a power plant on an isolated island such as Semirara with a supply of indigenous coal and deepwater access to international coal sources… close the loop of Bicol, Samar, Leyte, Cebu, Negros, Panay, Semirara, Mindoro and Batangas.”

Amen to that. We should have 24/7 electricity even if the Sun does not shine, even if the wind does not blow, even if a bad El Niño would reduce water supply in hydro dams.
-----------------