A good analysis of the GreenPeace (GP) business model was made by five scientist-authors including GP co-founder Patrick Moore. They noted that
"Although Greenpeace relies heavily on marketing, advertising, and free
market principles, they promote socialist and anti-capitalist ideals in their
messaging."
The "simple solution" that GP along with WWF, UN, Al Gore, etc. always propose is more government, national and multilateral like the UN; more government regulations and taxation, subsidies to crony energy sources. I like this chart where the authors noted,
" Greenpeace’s average annual expenditure on “Climate
change” over the last 10 years has been
---------------
See also:
Greenpeace is Blocking You, November 01, 2015
Agri Econ 24, Greenpeace voodoo science vs GMOs, July 07, 2016
Climate Tricks 51, The CCC, Greenpeace and fossil fuels, February 01, 2016
Climate Tricks 56, Using the CHR for climate harassment, July 30, 2016
Climate Tricks 70, Greenpeace and the Economist love fossil fuels, August 6, 2018
Climate Tricks 73, Attacking Dr. Will Happer as 'CC denier', September 10, 2018
Climate Tricks 74, People should eat insects to fight CC? October 29, 2018
Climate Tricks 75, Brazil President Borsonaro is 'threat' to the planet? November 16, 2018
They further observed, "Greenpeace is a very successful business. Their business
model can be summarized as follows:
1. Invent an “environmental problem” which sounds
somewhat plausible. Provide anecdotal evidence to support your claims, with
emotionally powerful imagery.
2. Invent a “simple solution” for the problem which
sounds somewhat plausible and emotionally appealing, but is physically unlikely
to ever be implemented.
3. Pick an “enemy” and blame them for obstructing the
implementation of the “solution”. Imply that anybody who disagrees with you is
probably working for this enemy.
4. Dismiss any alternative “solutions” to your problem as
“completely inadequate”."
https://www.heartland.org/publications-resources/publications/analysis-of-greenpeace-business-model?
approximately $34 million/year. This means that
Greenpeace’s annual “Climate campaign” expenditure is greater than the $31 million which
Greenpeace claim that Exxon has spent on “funding climate denial” over the entire 1998-2014
period!"
The full report, "Analysis of Greenpeace’s business
model & philosophy" by Dr. Michael Connolly, Dr. Ronan Connolly, Dr.
Willie Soon, Dr. Patrick Moore and Dr. Imelda Connolly (December 2018), 75
pages, https://www.heartland.org/_template-assets/documents/12-3-18%20Analysis%20of%20Greenpeace%20Business%20Model.pdf?
See also:
Greenpeace is Blocking You, November 01, 2015
Agri Econ 24, Greenpeace voodoo science vs GMOs, July 07, 2016
Climate Tricks 51, The CCC, Greenpeace and fossil fuels, February 01, 2016
Climate Tricks 56, Using the CHR for climate harassment, July 30, 2016
Climate Tricks 70, Greenpeace and the Economist love fossil fuels, August 6, 2018
Climate Tricks 73, Attacking Dr. Will Happer as 'CC denier', September 10, 2018
Climate Tricks 74, People should eat insects to fight CC? October 29, 2018
Climate Tricks 75, Brazil President Borsonaro is 'threat' to the planet? November 16, 2018
No comments:
Post a Comment