Here is another great article from Dr. Raul Fabella of UPSE. The meme here I got from the web and not part of the original article. Enjoy.
Abraham Lincoln’s
class hatred
February 16, 2020 | 11:35 pm
Introspective
By Raul V. Fabella
... But not if suddenly ants acquire a class consciousness.
What would happen if suddenly the worker class of ants decide that its members
too should now exercise their innate but hormonally suppressed capacity to bear
offspring of their own and decide to feed on, rather feed, the queen? If
suddenly the forager class decides that the soldier class are having too much
fun at their expense and sabotage the food train? The colony will soon die out.
Not by a physical act of God but by an internal virus of class hatred.
Humans are blessed and cursed with an evolved
consciousness. With this come resentment and envy — all the vices and virtues
that adorn a human being. Like it or not, we are prone to class envy and even
class hatred.
And human societies survive by reining in and harnessing
these tendencies towards the production of social reserves. Our dams, our
factories, our transport systems, they all embody our reserves. It is the
brotherhood of men that rechannel these individual proclivities to productive
endeavors. Unhinged, these tendencies result in social chaos and social
collapse.
Apropos this rechanneling of proclivities, I am inspired
by two quotations which embody my own limited understanding of how economic
progress gets engendered or aborted:
“The test of government is not whether we add to the
abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide for those who have
little.” — US President Franklin D. Roosevelt
“You cannot strengthen the weak by weakening the strong;
you cannot help the poor by discouraging the rich; you cannot help the wage
earner by pulling down the wage payer; you cannot further the brotherhood by
inciting class hatred among men.” — US President Abraham Lincoln
All leaders subscribe to the equity ethic of President
Roosevelt. But only a precious few subscribe to the efficiency ethic of
President Lincoln. President Roosevelt’s is a commitment to the final outcome
of inclusive abundance; President Lincoln’s is a commitment to an efficient
path towards inclusive abundance. Lincoln’s efficient path is to rechannel not
suppress the varied capabilities of different social classes towards inclusive
abundance.
Class hatred is antithesis to the efficient path. Most
class hating popular leaders produce economic disasters by an excess enthusiasm
for the first to the exclusion of the second. Deng Xiaoping’s miraculous China
attests to the wisdom of these two ethics pursued as one. Mao Zedong’s China
and Nicolas Maduro’s Venezuela attest to the utter folly of the pursuit of
equity without the tempering wisdom of efficiency.
It may surprise you as it did me that my first encounter
with the brilliant juxtaposition of the above two quotations was not in some
ponderous treatise on economic progress but in President Rodrigo Duterte’s 2016
Presidential Inaugural Address. He implied, even as he confessed ignorance of
the other cannons of Economics, that these two quotations encapsulated his own
innermost economic philosophy. Though more in hope than in conviction, we were
reassured. Economic wisdom couldn’t be more succinctly put. In the first two
years of Duterte’s presidency, he kept his promise to leave economic policy to
his economic team and the economy obliged.
The third year of Duterte saw a switch in the mindset:
the second ethic lost ground to the first. After the opposition Otso-Diretso
was squelched in the May 2019 elections, Philippine society has been subjected
to a firestorm blowing from along the Pasig River. The “hated oligarchs” has
resurfaced straight from Joma Sison’s playbook. Suddenly contracts that have
served the public well for decades became “onerous” and were threatened with
nullification. Has Lincoln’s dreaded class hatred made a landfall? If so, the
arteries of brotherhood and thus the capacity to grow our reserves now face
rupture. Venezuela beckons.
In that same inaugural address, President Duterte even
bound himself and his underlings to the strict observance of the rule of law
and the sanctity of contracts: “My adherence to due process and the rule of law
is uncompromising.”
“I order all department secretaries and heads of agencies
to refrain from changing and bending the rules on government contracts,
transactions and projects already approved and awaiting implementation.
Changing the rules when the game is ongoing is wrong.”
This is talking the talk of the rule of law and the
sanctity of contracts. Walking the walk and staying the course is another
matter, but we hoped. President Widodo of Indonesia, already in his second
term, stayed the course on the rule of law towards jobs creation. In the Philippines
of the post May 2019 election landslide victory, the walk, if at all, is just a
chicken walk. 2016 seems so long ago and so far away.
No comments:
Post a Comment