* This is my article in BusinessWorld last February 6, 2018.
Countries that impose zero income taxes on their
nationals are dependent on extracting and exporting their natural resources
such as oil and natural gas. Qatar, Bahrain, Brunei, Kuwait, Oman, Saudi
Arabia, and United Arab Emirates are examples of such countries.
Instead of minimizing the extraction of these fossil
fuels (and keeping them in the ground, as advocated by environmentalist
groups), these countries extract these resources big time, export them to the
rest of the world, and sustain their governments’ economic and social programs
without creating or imposing any income tax.
This is a lesson for the Philippines with an estimated $1
trillion worth of mineral reserves.
On the graph are data from the US Geological Survey
(USGS)which indicates that worldwide, the Philippines has the 5th largest
estimated reserves in nickel and 4th largest reserves in cobalt. Cobalt is
largely used to produce batteries for electric vehicles.
The reserves/production (R/P) ratio is computed here, the
ratio represents estimated number of years before the reserves are depleted on
the assumption that both R and P numbers will not change, which is unlikely
because modern and evolving technology through time will continue to discover
bigger reserves, or improve the utilization of existing reserves (see table).
The Philippines’ R/P ratio of 21 years for nickel is
short compared to global average of 35 years but longer than Indonesia’s 11
years. There is a need to continue exploration of other nickel deposits in the
Philippines as well as optimize the recovery of this and other metals per ton
of metal ores extracted.
Our R/P ratio of 70 years for cobalt is good, higher than
the global average of 64.5 years.
As more countries demand more electric vehicles (cars,
motorcycles, buses, trucks), the global appetite for cobalt will rise quickly.
China is currently the biggest importer and consumer of cobalt as it aims to
produce more electric vehicles in the medium to long term.
The rising demand for cobalt relative to supply is shown
in its rising prices, currently at $36/pound, the highest since some 15 years
ago except for 2008-2009 global financial turmoil where cobalt prices peaked at
around $53/pound.
Nickel prices have declined to around $4/ton in
2015-2016, now recovering upwards at current prices of around $6+/pound.
So there are big potential for more investments, more
jobs, more government tax revenues, from nickel and cobalt alone.
Then there are big potentials for copper and gold mining
in this country — if the Tampakan and Silangan projects would push through.
Tampakan, estimated to cost $5.9B in project development, will be the single
biggest foreign direct investment in the Philippines. For its part, Silangan is
worth about $2 billion.
In 2015, the Philippines produced an estimated 83.8 tons
of copper metal content, and 20.6 tons of gold metal content. These are small
amounts compared to the big global producers of copper: Chile 5,764 tons, China
1,710 tons, Peru 1,700 tons, US 1,380 tons.
Also in that year, the big gold producers were China with
450 tons, Australia with 278 tons, Russia with 252 tons, and the US with 214
tons.
The uncertainties in the mining sector continue to linger
even after the Commission on Appointments has rejected former DENR secretary
Gina Lopez in May 2017. The new Secretary Roy Cimatu has not yet formally
lifted the closure orders for some mining firms and the debate on open pit
mining still continues.
The big mining potentials of the Philippines on four
metals alone — nickel, cobalt, copper and gold — when realized by removing the
endless uncertainties and by relaxing the various anti-mining policies, will
allow the country to significantly reduce income tax rates.
Government should have no “right” to confiscate plenty of
resources from the pockets and savings of people and private enterprises,
especially where there are plenty of private provisions of infrastructure via
integrated PPP, private education, private health care, private housing,
private security and peace and order.
Bigger mining revenues and mining taxes through lesser
anti-mining policy uncertainties will be a key measure toward lowering income
taxes, both personal and corporate, in the medium to long term.
--------------
See also:
BWorld 182, Asia Liberty Forum 2018 in Jakarta, January 31, 2018
BWorld 182, Asia Liberty Forum 2018 in Jakarta, January 31, 2018
BWorld 183, Why low or zero income tax can mean more development, February 09, 2018
BWorld 184, ERC paralysis and implications for consumers, February 11, 2018
No comments:
Post a Comment