Showing posts with label International Society for Individual Liberty. Show all posts
Showing posts with label International Society for Individual Liberty. Show all posts

Thursday, January 15, 2015

Liberty in Singapore, Speech by Rainer Heufers in 2013

Reposting this from the International Society for Individual Liberty (ISIL), a nice speech by Rainer Heufers during the ISIL World Conference 2013 in Lauseanne.
----------

... Right now Singapore is where I have been based for the last two years. I created my company there and now that I am coming from Singapore, I always get the response, “Oh Singapore, great country isn’t it?” I am always a little surprised how often I hear that and where I hear that. So I started to wonder, do we have a case of Libertarian Orientalism actually?

Who are among the admirers of Singapore?

President Saakashvili of Georgia is very much one. When you go there, they often talk about the Singapore model. You go on and you find that the Communist Party of China really likes the Singapore model.

Well if you are in Africa, there is a big fan of Singapore over there. It is, Prime Minister Luc Adolph Tiao of Burkina Faso. And then there are the Libertarians and you wonder, whoa, how does it all go together? You look at this little website: GettingOutofAmerica.com that says that for those of the Libertarian persuasion, this tiny city-state has long represented their idea of a free market Valhalla. Whoa, big terms!

So I was really wondering how’s it all possible, and I am here to ask you what do you make out of it? You will have to give me the answers when we have the discussion later.

What libertarians see mostly are a couple of impressive facts. This is just ranking in the world, GDP per capita, 3rd out of 187 nations. Economic Freedom Ranking is 2nd out of 144. Global Competiveness Ranking is 2nd out of 144. Ease of Doing Business 1st of 185, and I don’t think libertarians look much at the Human Development Index, but if you have a quick peek at it, it would also be impressive at 18th out of 187. So that is really impressive and that makes a lot of governments look at Singapore.

See that’s what I am talking about. First of all I must say a lot of people really don’t know where Singapore actually is, so I don’t know whether everybody here knows where it is, there it is. That tiny little spot inside the yellow circle and on any reasonable map you have to circle it, otherwise it is really too small. Some images that I want to share, this is actually there at the tip of Malaysia of the Malaysians Peninsula that little island is an island actually. The merlion used to be the symbol of the city-state, now it’s really more the three towers. The Marina Bay Sands with that swimming pool on top of the roof like an arch on top and the Singapore Airlines. To those that fly a lot in the society of Singapore, I like to say it’s the preferred choice.

Okay let’s now take the bridge between Singapore and the libertarian principles. What are the libertarian principles? Quickly I believe, no, I am quoting here three principles,

1. Individual rights: that we have the right to live the life that we want to live, the way we want to live it, individually.
2. Spontaneous Order: where basically things and institutions and processes and procedures arrange themselves in a spontaneous way.
3. Limited Government: thirdly of course there needs to be a limited government.

I am quoting here from a speech that David Boaz once gave. I like these kinds of simplified things it helps a lot. So three simple principles: individual rights, spontaneous order, and limited government, I don’t think in this audience I need to explain on any of that.

And I thought okay then, let’s do a libertarian checklist looking at Singapore, how does it score?

Individual rights

Well first of all, there is no freedom of expression. Even giving this speech here I must admit, when you have a permanent residency in Singapore, you must think twice about what you say. It’s strange, but it is. You have to be careful. This is what a minister has to say, “it is important for us to ensure that Singaporeans read the right thing”. The ‘right thing’, that’s a typical statement from the government in Singapore. We want to make sure that people consume the right kind of information. He said that to the BBC.

Now, in June, they came up with a new idea. Any website that reports about Singapore and which has more than 50,000 unique visitors needs to pay a performance bond which is a $50,000 (dollar) license or in U. S. dollars a thirty nine thousand dollar ($39,000) license to be allowed to do so. This basically kills the most critical and underfunded websites that do report independently about Singaporean politics.

Not surprising then that the Freedom House would rank Singapore as only partly free, scoring 4 out of 7 on average. This basically means political rights and civil liberties are not guaranteed, especially the press in the country is not free. The newspaper there is a joke. It’s really great if you need to wrap fish or if you want clean your windows, but for anything else it’s really not really worthwhile. This you can say in Singapore because everybody thinks so.

Then there is no sex in the city or more precisely no gay sex in the city. This has been criminalized according to the laws that mutually consenting adult men cannot have sex with each other. Oral sex was prohibited and everybody was wondering which position of police would actually be in charge of checking on that? Though there was a very big demand for that job, but now they legalized it in 2007.

Actually Singapore is liberalizing because the people are fed up with this kind of government. There are changes that are happening now in Singapore as you can see now for example a gay movement the pink dot movement. This year and 2013 they had a massive uproar of people who all wore pink. You can’t make statements like you can’t wear pink and sit in a park. So that’s the pink dot movement and they were very successful this year. People are just fed up with being told what to say, what to think and what to do. The political position, well they had a lot of choices between prison and bankruptcy.

Singapore went so far that the government actually had an appointed member of opposition in the parliament because they thought that it’s quite bad the image if it’s all government. We need some opposition, so they appointed a member of the parliament to be the opposition. People thought it was also not a good idea. So, that has also changed because you can see now rallies of the opposition party which unfortunately is the workers party, have massive out pour again and if you go by the electoral vote it’s quite close for the government to actually lose power. Good outlook, so things are changing. The strong man he isn’t there anymore. Well, he is there, but he is not in power anymore. It is his son and his son is softer than Daddy.

Okay, so looking at our libertarian check list on individual rights; not really, on this one Singapore definitely failed. You can’t call that a libertarian system, oppressing individual rights, and I am only giving you some examples. I can’t give you the entire talk about everything in Singapore.

Spontaneous Order

Then, let’s all look at spontaneous order. Of, course the first thing you think about in spontaneous order is can everyone engage in business? Can you create a company, can you do business, etc. You saw already that Singapore is ranking very well in this report and this is truly the case. Singapore ranks number one in the world in this report and already in the first indicator in starting a business. It says it takes three procedures and three days to start a company.

This is actually not quite right. I started my own company. It takes about three hours. It’s amazing, I mean you can just create you can spend your day creating companies because it’s so easy. It’s really no problem so, that is truly amazing. The only thing that takes a little while is your bank then to check whether you’re actually worthy of having a bank account. You know the usual of what the banks do it takes what about two days or something, that is the little thing that you’re waiting for to open your corporate bank account.

I am also starting a business at the moment in Indonesia and I can tell you it takes longer and it costs a lot of money. But not in Singapore that one is fantastic. So that speaks a lot for spontaneous order to have this, starting a business like this. Then if you look at the top right, the one in red, trading across borders, ranks one. So free trade definitely that’s the hallmark of Singapore and that’s why we see Singapore I think the way we look at it like a libertarian Valhalla.

Free trade is really what Singapore is all about internationally. However, I am always trying to find a hair in the soup. Here is one about enforcing contracts. Suddenly out of brilliant performance enforcing contracts isn’t as good, its only ranking 12th because it takes a lot of procedures and 150 days to enforce your contract so there seems to be something not as brilliant, but in terms of starting a business and trading across borders, Singapore definitely, excellent performance.

What I have tried to do, is I tried to look now modestly at the Economic freedom of the world report to give you some figures from the freedom to trade report. Here is where freedom to trade international as you can see Singapore in 2010 ranks 2 with a score of 8.86, so basically that underlines the same thing; free international trade, Singapore with an absolutely brilliant performance. This goes really to the philosophy and the rationale of the country.

Liberty in the Philippines

* Reposting this  article from the ISIL. Thanks Joe for this opportunity.
----------

BY JOE KENT - JANUARY, 13TH 2015

Nonoy Oplas is an economist in the Philippines, and the President of Minimal Government Thinkers Inc.   Over the past five years, he has established network and alliances with other free market-oriented think tanks in Asia and other parts of the world.  Nonoy was interviewed by the International Society for Individual Liberty about liberty in the Philippines.  He blogs at funwithgovernment.blogspot.com.

Joe: What does the average person in the Philippines think of government and liberty? Is there any possibility for change?

Nonoy: The average Filipino would think that government regulations, subsidies, taxation, etc. are the answer to most problems, but also think that many government officials and employees are corrupt.  So they demand less corruption or “better governance”, not less governance.

However, liberty and economic freedom are accepted unconsciously.  People always go for bargains and cheaper prices when they go shopping or buy groceries.  They want freedom to buy and sell anywhere they want.

Joe: Are the ideas of liberty spreading in the Philippines, and if so, how?

Nonoy: Yes, even unconsciously.  They want freedom of expression, no censorship in the things they read and write on the web.  Conscious political liberty is still small though; people who explicitly demand less government.

Joe: Why do so many Filipinos go overseas to work?

Nonoy: Both supply push and demand pull. Supply push, many Filipinos want to try working and living abroad for higher pay, a new environment.  Demand pull, many foreigners want Filipino workers than other migrant workers.

Healthcare for instance, Filipino nurses and physicians are more warm in taking care of their patients, so hospitals in Saudi, UK, US, etc. prefer Filipino health workers.

Joe: Are there other factors as well? For example, do government policies have anything to do with the many Filipinos going overseas for work?

Nonoy: Certain government policies actually limit or restrict the potentials of migration of more Filipinos.  Like it imposed a ruling in Hong Kong that overseas Filipino workers (OFWs) should get this much as minimum wage there, and so on.  So some Hong Kong employers stopped getting OFWs and got Indonesians, Vietnamese, or other nationals instead.  I made a blog post on migration (here).

Joe: What policies are damaging to the people who are attempting to start a business in the Philippines?

Nonoy: Protectionist policies of the Constitution.  Some sectors are reserved exclusively for Filipinos, and some sectors allow foreign investments — but only up to 40% of total equity.  Then there are bureaucracies in national and local governments, both requiring their own set of permits.  Also multiple taxes and changing policies midway.

Joe: You mentioned permits.  What are some examples of permit requirements that prevent the average person from starting a business?

Nonoy: I wrote this two years ago but the type of bureaucracies still apply. http://funwithgovernment.blogspot.com/2013/02/business-bureaucracy-6-presentation-at.html

Joe: Is property rights abuse a problem in the Philippines, and do you have any examples?

Nonoy: Yes.  A clear example are the squatters and illegal settlers in private lands.  They come in droves, and many local governments do not drive them away because they are a big source of votes and political supporters.

Joe: I guess I mean, does the government ever take private property in the Philippines?

Nonoy: No, no instance of the Philippine government taking over a business or private property that I can remember.  The most that government does is to stop the construction of a building, or prevent the transfer of property ownership if there are active tax and other cases involved.  Or harass the owner(s) of a business if they happen to be a strong political enemy of those in power.

Joe: What other challenges do Filipinos face when it comes to individual freedom?

Nonoy: External factors, the foreign aid bodies and multilaterals (UN, WB, ADB, IMF, USAID, etc.) who think that governments should keep expanding.  They hire many academics and consultants who justify big government.  Internal factors — the populist belief that for many problems in society, more government regulations are the answer.

Sunday, April 15, 2012

Hayek in Asia 2: Shanghai Austrian Economics Summit 2012

Friedrich Hayek, an Austrian scholar in economics and legal/political philosophy who died 20 years ago, is famous among many free market-oriented scholars in Asia. Friedrich Mises, another Austrian scholar, is famous too.

The International Society for Individual Liberty (ISIL, http://www.isil.org/), a US-based libertarian organization, is co-sponsoring and financing a big conference in Asia, the Shanghai Austrian Economics Summit this coming July 20-23, 2012, in Double Tree by Hilton Hotel, Shanghai, China.

There will be 24 speakers, see the list here, http://shanghaisummit.wordpress.com/speakers/. Seven of them I personally know and have met at least once. From left to right:
1. Xingyuan Feng, CIPA-Unirule, China; 2. Barun Mitra, Liberty Institute, India
3.Hiroshi Yoshida, IPSA, FEI, Japan; 4. Rainer Heufers, Siap Solutions, Singapore
5. Ken Schooland, GIH, Hawaii, USA; 6. Tom Palmer, Cato-Atlas, USA; 7. Mary Ruwart, ISIL, USA


Barun and Xingyuan, I see them yearly since 2004 in different regional and international free market conferences and meetings. Sometimes I see them twice or thrice in one year, Barun especially as he would come to Manila as a speaker in other conferences here.

Hiroshi I've met in 2005 during the round table discussion on Hayek's book "The Constitution of Liberty" in Phuket, Thailand. Since then, I'd bump into him from time to time, but not yearly. Rainer worked at the Friedrich Naumann Foundation for Liberty (FNF) for many years, he helped organized the Economic Freedom Network (EFN) Asia annual conferences, and I have met him several times there.

Ken Schooland I've met twice, in Hawaii in 2007 then in Jakarta I think in 2010. He is the author of The Adventures of Jonathan Gullible: A Free Market OdysseyMary I've met only once, in Hawaii in 2007, while I've met Tom Palmer several times since 2008. He also came to Manila in 2009 and Minimal Government Thinkers helped organized four lectures for him in three universities here plus FNF Manila office.

I cannot attend this conference as I do not have a sponsor to pay for my plane fare and hotel, but I wish the organizers of this important event great success in terms of attracting more participants, especially from China. ISIL noted that Chinese scholar, Kenli "Li" Zhao Schoolland, has successfully organized Austrian Economics lectures in the past few years, so they have made this year's conference an international event.

I also hope that my other Chinese friend there from CIPA, Liu Junning, who at one time was considered the "Hayek of China" because of his deep intellectual discourse on liberty, rule of law, and other themes that Hayek discussed, would be able to attend. I heard a few years ago that the China communist government has marked him as a "dissident" and hence, is monitoring his movement.

Fellow defenders of individual liberty, free market and rule of law, in Asia and elsewhere, let us keep the torch burning.
---------

See also:
Top Asian free market think tanks, January 26, 2009
Hayek in Asia, September 20, 2010
Hayek 12: Friedrich Hayek's 20th Death Anniversary, March 26, 2012
(it has links to Hayek 1 to 11, discussion on some chapters of Hayek's book, "The Constitution of Liberty")
Why is Harry Thinking About Going to China? from HarryLeaks blog