Angat dam – opened in 1967 in Norzagara, Bulacan, owned
by Napocor -- is the main source of household and commercial water use in Metro Manila, Bulacan and nearby provinces. The Angat reservoir has a total capacity of 850 M cubic meters.
I asked Gladys for data re how much is water draw
out or release for Metropolitan Waterworks and Sewerage System (MWSS) use. If the water storage area and capacity of Angat remains the same all these years
but water withrawal for household and commercial use keeps rising yearly, then
the water level will always be below its levels in previous years.
Gladys asked the Dams group of NWRB and here are the numbers:
NWRB's normal allocation to MWSS is 46 cubic meters per
second (cms), equivalent to 165,600 cubic meters per hour or 3,974,400
cubic meters per day. On annual basis, MWSS receives 1,450.656 million cubic
meters per year from Angat dam/reservoir.
The average yield of the watershed is only 58 cubic
meters per second, plus average Umiray diversion of 12 cubic meters per second.
Water rights of NIA is 36 cubic meters per second, while MWSS is allocated 46
cubic meters per second 24/7/365. In the long run, year to year basis, plus El
Niño, the reservoir cannot store enough water to supply irrigation and domestic
water supply. Unlike before, power gen is now just dependent on the alloc of
NIA and MWSS.
I thanked Gladys for those numbers. For me, this implies one thing -- we need more
dams. Water is not a problem in the Philippines (or elsewhere) and will never be. So many people die and so much
properties are damaged yearly because of too much flood, too much water. The
problem is lack of dams to collect and store those excess water.
When my plane flew over Japan (Nagoya to Manila) several
years ago, I saw that in one river alone, they have about 7 dams on average,
from the highland to midlands to lowlands. They have several rivers in the
mountainous areas, so they have dozens if not hundreds of dams,
So before some groups will say "water crisis" or "water fight due to man-made climate change", they should realize that Angat alone will never be able to supply the rising water needs of the rising population.
------------See also:
Water deficit and alarmism surplus, July 25, 2010
"Water crisis" was never a crisis, July 26, 2010
On "water harvesting", July 27, 2010
No water crisis, only alarmism crisis, September 08, 2010
1 comment:
Water shouldn't be a problem provided that enough planning and self-discipline is applied. Unfortunately we live in a political and social culture that raises up the leader above the group supporting a view of governing that is based upon a top-down, dictator leadership model. The new leader comes in and in the name of "political will" throws away the plans of the previous leader. So there can be no long-term planning.
Those in Metro Manila are lucky of course. Since the national government is there, their water (and electricity, and roads, and all other services) get more than their fair share of national government resources and therefore are head and shoulders better than the other 85% of the country. Compare to Iloilo City, one of the wealthier non-Manila cities.
Remember water was solved by the Romans. This is not rocket science. It doesn't even require 19th Century industrial-age technology. Iron-age, or even bronze-age, technology is all that it requires. The reason why people do not have good water -- poor governance.
Post a Comment