Showing posts with label Climate Change Commission. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Climate Change Commission. Show all posts

Saturday, July 30, 2016

Climate Tricks 56, Using the CHR for climate harassment

There's a new development, unprecedented so far -- having the Commission on Human Rights (CHR) -- to accuse and harass multinational firms engaged in oil, cement, coal and mining.

From The Guardian last July 27:

"In a potential landmark legal case, the Commission on Human Rights of the Philippines (CHR), a constitutional body with the power to investigate human rights violations, has sent 47 “carbon majors” including Shell, BP, Chevron, BHP Billiton and Anglo American, a 60-page document accusing them of breaching people’s fundamental rights to “life, food, water, sanitation, adequate housing, and to self determination”.

I support the CHR and its Chairman Chito Gascon, a friend, in their fight against extra judicial killings (EJKs), hundreds of these cases so far nationwide since mid-May 2016 alone. Their time and resources can easily be depleted if they go person to person cases, dead or imprisoned. 

But I can not support the CHR in this new climate harassment. 

The first round of climate extortion is by governments of developing countries, demanding $100 B a year from governments of rich countries, under the various UN FCCC annual negotiations. So this is the 2nd round of extortion, NGOs and the Climate Change Commission (CCC) that prodded the CHR ultimately to result in demand for big money from big multinationals as "climate justice." So whether we have bad El Nino (drought, less rain/no rain, rise in global and Pacific Ocean's Nino regions temperature) those multinationals should give money. Or a bad La Nina (lots of rains, lots of flooding, decline in global temp.) those multinationals should still give money. Pera-pera na lahat.

A similar situation would be Mr. X having less money and more money and people say that it is proof that he's poor, so government should send him more money and other subsidies.

I remember that last January, Chito posted about the CCC-CHR meeting. So it was the CCC that influenced the CHR to launch this HR investigation. The hypothesis "more CO2 emission = more global warming/anthropogenic climate change" is a global and UN-hyped movement. Then later via other schemes, these firms should pay huge amount of money to the "climate victims" like the thousands who died in Tacloban City in November 2013 during typhoon Haiyan (local name "Yolanda"). 

In November 1912 or 101 years before Haiyan struck Tacloban, a huge storm also struck the same city and killed some 15k people. Haiyan killed more than 8,000 people out of some 98 M people in 2013, but that storm in 1912 killed 15,000 people out of only around 7.6 M Philippine population that time. Those big multinationals in oil, mining, cement, coal were responsible for that "man-made climate crime"? 
The CCC, WWF, other anti-fossil fuel environmentalists/NGOs/UN agencies have a great grand plan at climate extortion. They use their cars too often (not walking or cycling often), they frequently jetset to nice big beautiful cities abroad (not hitching with witches and manananggals who are fossil-fuel-free), they enjoy huge beautiful buildings and hotels made of cement and steel, they enjoy their electricity 24/7 (largely coming from coal power). Then turn around and demonize the oil, cement, coal and mining companies and demand huge money from these firms to compensate for their "climate crimes". Bright, very bright scheme.

Chito replied that "the CHR, in the course of these proceedings, will not go to the extent of imposing monetary penalties... the outcome of the process will be a report on the matter."

I thanked Chito and apologized for any misunderstanding but I am referring more to the CCC, not CHR, on the money issue. Because it is not in CHR nature to demand money from the accused firms (except the case of the Marcos' HR victims during Martial  Law). But ultimately it will lead there via other channels, with the CCC leading the charge.

Meanwhile, a good chart comparing various computer models' projections of "more global  warming" vs. actual warming starting 1975. 


A paleo-climate data over the past 1,100 years. Even the first UN IPCC report in 1990 recognized this.


That chart was removed by succeeding IPCC reports. The UN and various country governments will never accept the theory of cyclical/natural/nature-made CC. It will invalidate their grand plans for global ecological central planning, the various climate rackets and junkets lined up in the coming decades or even century.
-------------

See also:  

Monday, February 01, 2016

Climate Tricks 51, The CCC, Greenpeace and fossil fuels

A friend, Commission on Human Rights (CHR) Commssioner Chito Gascon posted this status and photos last January 28.

On 27 January 2016, the Commission on Human Rights (CHR), with the Climate Change Commission (CCC), organized a whole-day learning session on relevant environmental laws, national policies and international mechanisms on climate change. One of the objectives of this activity was to emphasize the interdependence between climate change and human rights. It was also a venue for both parties to keep each other updated on the existing programs and projects concerning mitigation, as implemented by CCC and other involved government agencies.


This initiative is part of CHR’s program of actions in response to the complaint filed by Green Peace and other environmental advocacy groups on 22 September 2015 that called for the investigation of big fossil fuel companies for violating human rights through environmental pollution. The said complaint is the first petition in the world against the so-called 50 “carbon majors.

I made the following comments:

Huh? Greenpeace people do not ride cars, buses, airplanes -- all that use fossil fuels? They only walk, ride bicycles and flying brooms that do not use fossil fuels? hehehe, double talk pa more.

And GP, the great campaigner against GMO. Ask the scientists from UP -- Diliman, Manila, Los Banos, etc. -- if GMOs like Bt eggplant are indeed that scary.

Here's what GP Founder, Patrick Moore, say about fossil fuels and CO2 emission, October 2015. Long, technical paper, but worth reading. http://wattsupwiththat.com/.../greenpeace-founder.../

Greenpeace founder delivers powerful annual lecture, praises carbon dioxide - full…
WATTSUPWITHTHAT.COM

Hi CCC guys, GP, WWF, UN,... you have lots of climate meetings and conferences each year, jet setting from one big city to another, or some exotic resorts. All your plane rides, car or bus rides, use petroleum/fossil fuel 100%. In case you take airplanes that run on water, or you ride via flying brooms or kites or other flying objects that use zero fossil fuel, pls post immediately so I can help spread it out. That you guys walk the talk and not engage in double talk. cheers.
----------

More stories about Greenpeace here, from http://wattsupwiththat.com/?s=Greenpeace


And a few years ago, there was a proposal by the CCC of a climate or extreme weather index insurance for farmers and fisherfolks. When there are more rains and no rain for X number of days, where there are more floods or no flood for X number of days, farmers and other food producers will be paid. By whom? By private crop insurance firms, so farmers will pay a (bad) weather insurance fee.

Weird proposal because less flood and more flood, less rains and more rains, less storms and more storms, have been with us for decades, for centuries, even for millions of years.

Global Tropical Cyclone Frequency- 1971 to Present



source: http://policlimate.com/tropical/frequency_12months.png

Climate alarmists and religionists should study more data, hard scientific data, before they mouth "unprecedented" and "unequivocal" flooding/rains/drought/storms. These "extreme" events do have precedents, even before CO2 concentration in the atmosphere was below 350ppm, even before the UN was invented.
---------------

See also: