FNF Philippines and Liberal Challenges 2013-2016

Yesterday, exactly one month from the May 13, 2013 elections, the Friedrich Naumann Foundation for Freedom (FNF) Manila office held a good conference, "Liberal Challenges 2013-2016" held at C3 Events Place in Greenhills, San Juan City, Metro Manila. Participants were some local executives (Mayors, Governors) and Congressmen/women of the Liberal Party (LP) who won in the elections last month, plus sectoral groups affiliated with LP (women, labor, youth, etc.). Some alumni of the International Academy for Leadership (IAF) in Gummersbach, Germany like me were also invited.

Below, Jules Maaten, the Resident Representative or Country Director of FNF Philippines gave the opening remarks, mainly his observation and assessment as FNF official and a foreigner observer (foreigners cannot vote in the Philippines even if they are long time residents and taxpayers in the country). Jules himself was a politician, a former Member of Parliament (MP) of the European Union. He said that despite "national pastime"  of skepticism of the performance of President "PNoy" Aquino, there has been marked improvement in the governance and public administration in the country, and recent fast economic growth is among the results of such improvement.

The panel speakers were (from left): LP's VP for Women Vicky Garchitorena, Batanes Rep. Djna Abad, Iloilo City Mayor Jed Mabilog, and Zamboanga City Mayor Beng Climaco. Journalist and Rappler Editor Marites Vitug was the moderator. 

Vicky talked about the role of civil society and NGO leaders in fiscalizing government, Congw. Dina talked about the important legislation passed in the last Congress and the priority bills, in her mind, that must be enacted in the next three years. Mayor Jed talked about the liberal reforms they introduced in Iloilo City, like reducing the period to get a business permit from City Hall, from the previous 10 months down to three months, down to 15 working days, down to three days, and finally down to just 30 minutes. We clapped on this good news.

Mayor Beng talked about how she and her team managed to beat the wide machinery of the Jalosjos clan. She is an articulate and fluent speaker lady.

I brought four friends of Minimal Government Thinkers. From left: Mike Perez, Dr. Jed Inciong (a physician, also with MG Board), Harry Santos and Carla Ezequiel. There could have been more who wanted to join us, but at least two were on provincial trips.

The venue was nice. It was my first time to see C3 Events Place. It was raining hard yesterday though, with heavy flooding in many streets in Metro Manila. One reason perhaps why some guests were not able to come. Food was great. Lots of them. Also an open bar, but I contented myself with two cans of beer, did not sip either white or red wine.

The speakers, moderator, Jules and my friend, Gladys Cruz-Sta Rita, in red dress holding flowers. Fredo, the FNF mascot for Freedom, gave Gladys those flowers. She was the LP Director General and was in the thick of the electoral campaigns. She's my friend, my batchmate at UP School of Economics, and we belong to the same student organization, the UP Economics Towards Consciousness (UP ETC). Before joining the LP, she was the longest-serving Provincial Administrator in the whole country, for 17 years I think, serving three different Governors of the big province of Bulacan.

Mike is among the hard core libertarians but he was happy to hear the good news on reducing the bureaucracy as shared by Mayor Jed Mabilog. Mike is also a fellow Ilongo from Negros Occidental. I told Mayor Jed that my wife and her family are from Iloilo City.

Before going home, we had a group photo with Jules and Lito Arlegui, second from left. Lito is the Regional Program Officer of the Council for Asian Liberals and Democrats (CALD). CALD is among the major programs of FNF in Asia, members are politicians and political parties. The Economic Freedom Network (EFN) Asia is another major project of FNF, members are free market leaning think tanks, NGOs and academics. MG Thinkers is an active member of EFN Asia.

I am a liberal, a classic liberal to be precise, or "libertarian" as often used. Between two wings of libertarianism, anarchy (zero authority, zero government) and minarchy (small and limited government), I obviously belong to the latter. There are certain policies of the LP that I do not agree with, like the drug price control policy as initiated by LP President and former Senator Mar Roxas; playing with populism and expanded welfarism. But there are also certain policies that I support, like the move towards free trade and reducing business bureaucracies.

My loyalty is to the ideology of liberalism -- individual liberty, personal freedom, personal responsibility, free market and competition, rule of law, tolerance and human rights. For me it is the most superior ideology in the planet. Many people may not be aware of the essence of liberalism, that is why they are enamored with populism and socialism. Some simply just love the racket of socialism -- they can centrally plan, regulate and regulate even micro concerns, they can tell and bully ordinary people how they should behave and run their own lives, and they can tax and tax all they want -- habits of insecure and dictatorial-leaning people.

I am happy that the FNF is around to advance the ideology of liberalism and individual freedom. The move by the FNF Board in Germany to put "Fur die Freiheit" or "For Freedom" in big letters, several times bigger than the letters of Friedrich Naumann Foundation itself, was a good move. Emphasize Freedom, emphasize liberty, individual liberty.
---------------

See also:
FNF Freedom Run 2011, November 28, 2011 
Pol. Ideology 23: 25 Years of Liberalism in the Philippines, December 07, 2011 
Free Trade 23: FNF on Free Trade Agreements, February 10, 2012

China Watch 17: Using Drones Over Scarborough, SCS

Last Friday, I posted this in my facebook wall. See the exchanges after that, until today:
----------

I support this suggestion from Stephen P. Cutlerr: "The Philippines may find a better "return on investment" for its military money by buying fleets of drones, instead of 48 F-16s at millions each, with millions for maintenance, and even more millions for pilots."

Shadow Hawk Munition portends a new era of warfare

www.gizmag.com

Lockheed Martin's new Shadow Hawk weapon is deceptively small considering the influence it will have on warfare

Ian  Thanks Noy... Im sharing this one!

Nonoy On Steve's wall where he posted the above link, I wrote,
" I support this Steve. We need more information as we go to internationalize the Scarborough/Spratlys issue. Only rent-seekers in the government and their armament suppliers want those expensive military hardware. The cheapest, and peaceful way to expose and shame China, is more information, more international discussion and negotiation, never, never, never, military confrontation."

To Mr. Nic O who wrote, "Make that armed drones with all sorts of missiles and guns, plus information warfare capability." I replied to him,
"Hi Nic, you want more money from us taxpayers, for more missiles, more guns, more warfare capability? Come on, what do you want to achieve aside from impoverishing us further, win a war with China?"

There is a possibility though, that the "more missiles, more jet fighters, more war" camp will win the debate, If that is the case, I propose that we get money from privatizing Camp Aguinaldo + the PMA campus in Baguio. DND and AFP HQ be moved to a cheaper place in Cavite perhaps. Get the money quick and modernize the AFP. They should never, never, get it from taxpayers' pockets.

1. Philippine government via the DFA should pursue international diplomacy and multilateral negotiations, endlessly.
2. Civil society and private citizens can launch various activities, no central plan, no central bureaucracy, to expose and shame not only the China government bullying but also the local military rent-seekers.
3. Do not entertain the military and war option. It is simply an idiotic path,.. http://funwithgovernment.blogspot.com/2012/05/china-watch-16-scarborough-shoal.html

Doods i'm in favor of building nuclear capability as a deterrent and to provide cheap nuclear energy to the country

Patrick Nonoy, the only downside here is if our military will buy drones then it is likely that daily surveillance sorties around Boracay: spying on all those nude sunbathers and beach sex :)

Nonoy Doods, me too, I'm pro nuke energy. Modern nuke tech even use nuke wastes as fuel itself, so it becomes perpetual power.
Patrick, highly possible :-)

Josef  Noy I think the debate on drones v. jet fighters has reached such a level in the US air force, but not to the degree of sacrificing one for the other. Its always a matter of functionality, and defense experts of course recognize that there are certain things drones cant do, like intercept and outmaneuver a modern Chinese J10 fighter jet piloted by one of China's best. I dont think defense experts have ever forwarded the idea that drones can soon take over the interceptor fighter role of direct-piloted jets. They have performed quite well in surveillance and air to ground attack roles, but only in environments where the other side lacks countervailing air assets. I have never heard of a drone intercepting and engaging a fighter jet in a dog fight.

Nonoy  But I don't support using drones for real war Jo. What do we want to achieve if we really want war with China, win it? That's day dreaming. China communist govt, being a communist and totalitarian govt, wants war, war, and more war. They bully and kill their own citizens, they bully Tibet, China. We deprive them of such option. So I support using drones to have possibly 24/7 monitoring of SCS/Scarborough, take photos, lots of evidence, for prolonged legal and international debates. Shame China via international debates, never in mil confrontation.

Eugene  Ahhh governments, they are real pain in the neck. Take them away and you'll see Filipino, Chinese, Taiwanese, Vietnamese, Malaysian fishermen going to the shoal with no conflict.