Wednesday, February 18, 2015

ASEAN Voices 3: Gaming and Casino Tourism in Asia

* This is my article for ASEAN Voices, a new Jakarta-based magazine, February 2015 issue.
----------
Tourism is a major economic player and job creator in many developing countries including in Southeast Asia. The region places next to China as being the most dynamic and fastest-growing area in  the  world, as it offers thousands of beach resorts, mountain resorts, and city centers that cater to visitors from other countries.

The main destinations for foreigners visiting East Asia are  China, Thailand, Malaysia, Hong Kong, and Macau, which is especially interesting because while its visitor-arrivals in 2013 was only one-quarter of that seen on mainland China, its tourism receipts were similar to those from the entire country.

Table 1.
source: http://dtxtq4w60xqpw.cloudfront.net/sites/all/files/pdf/unwto_highlights14_en.pdf

What explains for such enormous tourism receipts from Macau? It is, of course gaming and casino tourism. Macau is No 1 on the planet in gaming revenues. In 2013 it reaped US$45.1 billion, followed by Las Vegas with US$6.5 billion; Singapore with US$6.1 billion; Atlantic City at US$2.9 billion; and the Philippines, which took in US$2.2 billion.

It is only logical then, that other Asian economies seek to duplicate the fantastic performance of gaming and casino tourism in Macau, and have launched various casino projects. Among them, according to Asia Awakens: The Growth of Casino Tourism, are the following:

·         Singapore’s integrated resorts in Marina Bay and Sentosa Island, with a combined value of approximately US$9 billion.
·         Philippines’integrated resort project, Entertainment City at Manila Bay, with a projected value of US$15 billion.
·         Vietnam’s integrated resort projects in Ho Tram, Danang and Phu Quoc, each involving investments of more than US$4.5 billion.
·         Cambodia’s projects in Koh Rong island, costing some US$2 billion, along with an integrated resort at Angkor Wat.
·          Malaysia’s Resorts World.
·         South Korea’s integrated resort development in Jejuisland, valued at some US$3.6 billion.

These casino developments are evidence of the dynamic and growing competition among countries in the Asean region, as well as in the gaming tourism sector.

However, one only has to look at the Las Vegas model, being a once-derelict patch of dry land that has become a multi-faceted entertainment venue centered upon frivolity. It is crucial to note that Las Vegas has never depended entirely upon casinos to bring the cash in.

According to the World Trade and Tourism Council, the city’s Disney-style hotels, boasting some 133.000 rooms, along with attractions, shows and recreational activities, account for half of the casinos’ revenue streams, meaning that wider tourism development and casino construction merely go hand-in-hand with one another.

Meanwhile, in the Philippines, the biggest player is the government-owned Philippine Amusement and Gaming Corporation with its dozen-plus casinos in Metro Manila and other major cities throughout the country.

But the country’s much-recognized and largest project is “Entertainment City” in Manila Bay, a huge 120 hectare development built on reclaimed land and hosting four huge licensees.

Table 2. 

Resorts World Manila is the sister company of Resorts World Genting, Malaysia, and Resorts World Sentosa, Singapore. From 2009 to 2013, it was the only casino resort in Metro Manila, until the opening of Solaire Resort and Casino.

Solaire is a new and large project by billionaire Enrique Razon, owner of International Container Terminal Services, Inc, which moves ships and cargo to 19 countries throughout the world. The resort includes a five-star hotel with 500 rooms and 1,000-seat ballroom.

City of Dreams casino held a soft opening last December, then a grand opening on Feb 2. The casino is a joint venture between Henry Sy, the Philippines’ richest family, Australian billionaire James Packer, and Lawrence Ho, Co-Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Melco Crown Entertainment, and son of Macau casino mogul Stanley Ho.

Melco Crown Philippines Resorts Corporation President Clarence Chung said the new casino will provide additional choices for their customer base in Macau.

COD has three hotels: Crown Towers, Nobu and Hyatt. It is said to have attracted some 60,000 visitors during its soft opening last December, and since then has averaged 15,000 daily visitors.

The Manila Bay Resorts is owned by Japanese billionaire Kazuo Okada.

With these four resorts and casinos, the Philippines’ gaming sector is projected
to earn big, increasing from US$2 billion in 2012 to US$4 billion by 2016.

Table 3.
Sources: 2009-2013 actual, PAGCOR; 2014-2017 Forecast, The Innovation Group.


Regarding area infrastructure, there is ongoing large-scale skyway construction that connects Manila’s four airport terminals to Entertainment City. When this project is completed in 2016, it will drastically cut the travel time for visitors, local and foreign, from the airport to the resort-casinos.

But how do most Filipinos view these foreign gamblers and visitors? Generally, their opinions range from neutral to positive. Foreign gamblers do nothing to harm local residents, instead they just spend and spend, winning money if they are lucky, and in the process they provide lots of jobs and lots of tips to Filipino resort employees, officers and entertainers. Direct hires are about 5,000 jobs per casino; hotel rooms supply are expanded.

Other sectors, of course, will complain that the gambling and casino culture could permeate many Filipinos’ lives, as people seek to get rich-quick. Yet, this is not a strong argument because there are many types of gambling that Filipinos are now engaged in, from ordinary card games to bingo for charity, as well as the lotto and sweepstakes, and even cockfighting.

On the other hand, the government should see the enormous opportunities in the resorts-hotels-casino sector. There is no doubt that casinos need to always be considered in the wider tourism context—as better infrastructure leading into a casino will inevitably allow the casino to have a more positive impact on a region.

It is also a large job creator, from airlines to hotels, restaurants and entertainment, and can even evolve into medical tourism.

The government, in the meantime, collects taxes from 5%-17% based on GGR. Staring last year, casinos also pay corporate income tax.

It is therefore commended that the high taxes that actually also hound many other local businesses is slashed. At the end of the day, when people have high-paying and stable jobs, they become less dependent upon various government welfare and subsidy programs.
-------------- 

See also: 
ASEAN Voices 2: PH Multinationals in the Region, February 01, 2015 

Tuesday, February 17, 2015

MeTA 19: National Forum 2015, Empowerment of Patients

The two-days annual national forum of the Medicines Transparency Alliance (MeTA) Philippines started today. I attended the afternoon session only because I attended the w FNF event at The Mind Museum, Fort Bonifacio.


Here is the program.

Daty 1, February 17

SESSION 1:  OPENING OF THE 2015 FORUM
ACCESS AND EQUITY: MAKING HEALTHCARE A REALITY FOR ALL

1. Invocation, Ms. Precy Declaro-Deluria,
Executive Director, Philippine Cerebral Palsy, Inc.

2. Overview of the Forum, Ms. Cecilia C. Sison, Country Coordinator, MeTA Philippines
Opening Message, Mr. Roberto M. Pagdanganan, Chairman of MeTA Philippines

3. Remarks from the International MeTA Secretariat
Ms. Deirdre Dimancesco, Technical Officer - Department of Essential Medicines, World Health Organization (WHO)
Dr. Tim Reed, Executive Director, Health Action International (HAI)

4. Message of the Department of Health (DOH)
Atty. Nicolas B. Lutero III, OIC, FDA; Director, Legal Services, DOH

5. Keynote Speech, Dr. Julie Lyn Hall, MBE, WHO Representative to the Philippines

SESSION 2: EMPOWERMENT, ENGAGING PATIENTS IN THE DIALOGUE ON HEALTH

6. Stakeholder Mapping and Development of a Framework for the Engagement and Empowerment of Patient Organizations in the Philippines
Mr. Wadel S. Cabrera III, WHO / MeTA Project Consultant

7. Panel Discussion
Moderator: Dr. Noel R. Juban, Professor, UP College of Medicine

(a) Ms. Deirdre Dimancesco, Technical Officer - Department of Essential Medicines, WHO
(b) Dr. Maria Minerva P. Calimag, President, Philippine Medical Association (PMA)
(c) Mr. Teodoro B. Padilla, Executive Director, Pharmaceutical and Healthcare Association of the Philippines (PHAP)
(d) Engr. Emer Rojas, President, New Vois Association of the Philippines
(e) Dr. Benjamin Bernardino, Secretary General, Life Haven Independent Living Center
(f) Ms. Salvacion Basiano, President, Center for Empowerment and Development of the Elderly and Seniors

(photo below, during the MeTA national forum 2014, held at Bayanihan Center, Unilab Complex, Pasig City)


SESSION 3: MULTISTAKEHOLDER COLLABORATION, HEALTH AND MEDICINES FOR THE FILIPINO PATIENT

8. Panel Discussion – Part 1 (Access to Medicines)
Moderator: Mr. Tomas Marcelo Luke G. Agana III,  Adviser, Philippine Chamber of  the Pharmaceutical Industry (PCPI)

(a) Drug Price Watch / Electronic Drug Price Monitoring System (EDPMS) / Drug Price Reference Index (DPRI)
by Mark Haasis, National Center for Pharmaceutical Access and Management (NCPAM), DOH

(b) Rational Use of Medicines (RUM) Framework / Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR) Policy,
by Dr. Anna Melissa S. Guerrero, Program Manager, NCPAM, DOH

(c) Combating SSFFC (substandard, spurious, falselylabeled, falsified, counterfeit) medical products / Coalition for Safe Medicines, 
by Ms. Maria Lourdes C. Santiago, RPh (invited), Director, Center for Drug Regulation and Research, Food and Drug Administration (FDA)

(d) Pharmaceutical Transparency Through Technology (PTTT) / LUNAS mobile app, 
by Dr. Bryan Albert Lim, Founding Partner, Health Sector Catalyst

(e) Tamang Serbisyo para sa Kalusugan ng Pamilya (TSeKaP) / Z Benefits 
by Dr. Rizza Majella L. Herrera,  Head, PCB/TSeKaP Team, Philippine Health Insurance Corporation (PhilHealth)

(f) Local government initiatives to address medicine needs of its constituents and the community 
by Hon. Gerardo V. Calderon (invited), Mayor, Municipality of Angono, Rizal

(g) Training Modules on Supply Chain Management (SCM) / Philippine Practical Standards for Pharmacists (PhilPSP)
by Mr. Roderick L. Salenga, NPO (EDM), WHO Country Office

Day 2, February 18

SESSION 4:  STAKEHOLDER PERSPECTIVES

10. Stakeholder Workshops
Moderator: Ms. Cecilia C. Sison,  Country Coordinator,  MeTA Philippines

Group Facilitators:
 Mr. Ralph Emerson P. Degollacion
 Dr. Irene F. Farinas
 Mr. Manuel Alexander Haasis
 Dr. Elenita Loida A. Pedrosa
 Ms. Karen A. Villanueva

SESSION 5:  SHARING STAKEHOLDER INSIGHTS

Invocation Ms. Maria Zenaida J. Averilla, Founder / CEO, Scleroderma Society of the Philippines

Reports on the Day 1 Stakeholder Workshops

11. SESSION 6: ACCOUNTABILITY,  FOLLOWING THE MONEY SPENT ON KEY HEALTH PROGRAMS

(a) Medicines Watch, by Dr. Elmer S. Soriano, MeTA / CHAT Project Consultant, Civika Institute

(b) Philhealth Watch, by Mr. Rene R. Raya, MeTA / CHAT Project Consultant, Action for Economic Reform

(c) Sin Tax Monitoring Tool, by Ms. Marian Theresia R. Valera, Consultant, HealthJustice Philippines

12. Lunch / Civil Society Meeting with the IMS
Panel Discussion

Moderator: Mr. Roderick L. Salenga,  NPO (EMD),  WHO Country Office
(a) Asst. Sec. Elmer G. Punzalan, MD (invited), Head, Office for Health Regulation, DOH
(b) Ruben John A. Basa, Senior Vice President, Health Finance Policy Group, PhilHealth
(c) Ms. Teofila E. Remotigue, CEO, National Pharmaceutical Foundation, Inc., Coalition for Health Advocacy and Transparency

SESSION 7:  SUSTAINABILITY, BUILDING ON THE GAINS AND MOVING FORWARD

13. Response of The Filipino Patient 
Mr. Josefino de Guzman, President, Psoriasis Philippines;
Ms. Maria Fatima G. Lorenzo, President, Philippine Alliance of Patient Organizations

Synthesis and Closing Remarks 
Mr. Roberto M. Pagdanganan, Chairman, MeTA Philippines
------------

MeTA 16: Day 1 of Conference 2014, February 11, 2014 

Monday, February 16, 2015

Free Trade 43: On PH-Germany or PH-EU FTA

Tomorrow, I will attend this forum co-organized by the Friedricy Naumann Foundation for Freedom (FNF). Although free trade between the EU and the Philippines is not mentioned in  the theme, I think it should be raised from time to time.

Here are two recent reports that point to the potentials of an EU-PH or at least Germany-PH future free trade agreement (FTA).

Manila Bulletin,  December 13, 2014

Walter van Hattum, head of economic and trade section of EU Delegation in the Philippines, said at the Open Dialogue on Trade and Investment of the Philippines and European Union, that both economic partners are performing below potential.

He said that EU with 28 member countries and a market of over 500 people can commit to double its investments and trade with the Philippines. Bilateral trade also increased by 21 percent to over $7 billion in the first six months of the year largely to aircraft purchases by the country’s two airlines.

In 2013, bilateral trade reached 11 billion euros with the Philippines exporting services, agriculture and processed foods, textile, and electronics as against EU exports to Manila of high value aircraft.

EU’s investments here in the country in the last decade has doubled to 7-8 billion euros, making them the Philippines largest foreign investor accounting for 30 percent of the country’s total foreign direct investments and creating 450,000 jobs for Filipinos.

Aquino secures $2.38 B worth of investments from European companies
Manila Bulletin, September 21, 2014

Berlin, Germany – German Chancellor Angela Merkel, impressed with the “dynamic growth” of the Philippines, proposed a free trade arrangement between the two countries during a meeting with President Aquino in Berlin Friday, saying this could further increase bilateral trade, currently at $4.7 billion.

Merkel said for the first time, the two countries have reach trade volume of more than $4 billion in 2013. “Bilaterally, we think that we can build on this, this can be increased,” the German leader added.

“For German companies, investments in the Philippines will be boosted if there is a right regulatory framework in place, if there is transparency and competitive laws, and also investment traditions are reliable, the legal situation too,” she added.

There is a good paper, EU-Philippines Trade and Investments Factfile 2012 prepared by The Delegation of EU to the Philippines. Among the data presented are the following.

Trade in goods is not rising, just flatlining on average. Not a good picture actually.


Trade in services, though remain not so substantial, is somehow rising.


EU trade with selected ASEAN countries in 2012. Total trade in the PH was not even  half of total trade between Vietnam-EU or Indonesia-EU.


PH trade with major partners in 2012. The PH economy has become more Asia-centered because of ASEAN FTA (AFTA), ASEAN-China, ASEAN-Japan pending FTAs.


EU member states' trade with the PH, 2011 and 2012. The top five trade partners of the PH are Germany, Netherlands, France, UK and Italy.


An EU-PH FTA seems a far away target because many EU member states remain protectionist to countries outside the Union as the continent deals with flat or rising poverty. And the less developed ASEAN member states like Cambodia, Laos and Myanmar tend to slow down on trade liberalization with countries outside the  association.

The FTA should be kept as a goal in the  short- and medium-term. Governments around the world should realize that countries and governments do NOT trade with each other. People and companies do. So trade barriers, both tariff and non-tariff barriers (NTBs) should be removed or drastically cut/reduced.
------------

See also:
Free Trade 35: EU-FNF Forum on 'FDI Engine for Job Growth', May 15, 2014
Free Trade 39: Advantages of Unilateral Trade Liberalization, October 12, 2014 
Free Trade 40: Razeen Sally Joins IDEAS, to Campaign for More Liberalization, November 25, 2014 
Free Trade 41: David Ricardo, CPE, FPE and Consumer Surplus, December 06, 2014
Free Trade 42: ASEAN Trade and Unilateral Liberalization Challenge, January 23, 2015

War War is Stupid

Yes. War is stupid. Regardless of the justifications and alibi. War is stupid.

To the advocates of new "All out war" in Muslim Mindanao, other war mongers, may I advice that you try living in conflict areas like Mamasapano in Maguindanao or Basilan so you will see how ugly and brutal endless fighting can be.

Here is one story of an ugly war, happened only last month.

Shortly before the Mamasapano incident happened on January 25, Sarah’s husband, Badrudin Langalen, with his cow in tow, was on his way home from the cornfields to charge his cellphone when the SAF commandos, on the assumption that he was an MILF fighter, captured him.


When the fighting between the MILF and the SAF finally started, with his hands tied behind his back, the helpless Badrudin and his cow got caught in the crossfire.

He was only 21 – too young to die. Dying was probably the last thing on his mind. Death is too much of a punishment for being at the wrong place at the wrong time. In war, rules of engagement protect combatants who are incapable of fighting back. What protection was there for a wandering civilian like him?

Residents in Mamasapano claimed there were arbitrary killings and indiscriminate firing. While the assault teams were fighting the MILF in the fields, other soldiers on standby in communities opened fire, killing innocent civilians....

Today I chanced upon this facebook page of Major Harold Magallanes Cabunoc. The guy makes sense. I am copy-pasting some of his recent postings. To non-Filipino friends, this Filipino soldier is talking about peace and explicitly dislikes war as he has seen firsthand the ugly faces and places of war, Filipinos shooting and killing each other.

February 15, 2015

Sa mga nagbabangayang mga magkakapatid na Muslim at Kristiyano dito sa aking pahina, mas maiging intindihin natin ang kasaysayan ng Pilipinas bago dumating ang mga Kastila para maintindihan mo ang pinagmulan ng ipinaglalaban ng mga kapatid nating Muslim….

Panay gyera ang ginawang solusyon ng gobyerno ng Pilipinas sa mga nakipaglaban para sa kanilang karapatan, kahit noon pang 1970s. Hindi ito natapos at lalong dumami ang nasaktan, at lalong naghihirap ang Muslim Mindanao dahil pati ang maraming namumuno sa kanila ay sarili lang ang pinapayaman, at hinahayaang magiging mangmang at gumagapang sa hirap ang kanilang mga kababayan. Ang kanilang freedom fighters ay tinatawag nating terrorists. (Di ko sinasabing tama ang ginawa sa SAF 44 at pati yong pamumugot ng Abu sa Basilan at Sulu). Lalong dumadami ang radicalized dahil sa kahirapan at kamangmangan. Kung anu-anong armadong grupo ang lumalabas na mandirigma at ang iba sa kanila ay sinasakyan ng mga jihadists kagaya ng Al Qaeda at Jemaah Islamiya. Kapag panay gyera tayo, walang katapusan ang galit at bawian ng kapwa Pilipino. Lahat tayo talunan kapag gagawin nating All out War.

Kawawa ang mas nakararaming sibilyan sa gyera. Saksi ako sa paghihirap nila sa mga evacuation centers. Nakikita ko ang mga nawasak na komunidad at mga duguang mandirigma sa magkabilang panig. Nakikita ko ito dahil kasama ako sa nakikigyera sa kanila sapagkat ito ay aking tungkulin bilang sundalo ng bayan.

Hindi po military solution lamang ang kasagutan kundi negotiated political settement. Dapat matikman ng mga kapatid natin ang kapayapaan at kaunlaran. Hikayatin natin silang talikuran ang karahasan at pakikipagpatayan sa kapwa Pilipino. Hikayatin natin silang huwag kanlungin ang mga terorista at wag gumawa ng terorismo. Hikayatin natin ang sarili nilang mga pinuno na lagyan ng puso ang paninilbihan sa bayan, at patikimin ng taos-pusong serbisyo publiko ang taumbayan. Bombahin ang Muslim Mindanao ng development projects nang magkaroon sila ng oportunidad na makaahon sa kahirapan.

Hikayatin din natin ang lahat na Kristiyano na alamin ang tunay na kasaysayan ng Pilipinas dahil susi ito sa pag-uuwanaan.

Magkaisa tayong lahat na isulong ang kapayapaan at makamit ang hustisya ng lahat na nabiktima ng karahasan.

February 14

Mahirap makipaglaban sa kapwa Pilipino. Ang mandirigmang may puso, nirerespeto ang kaaway na hindi na lumalaban.

Ganito dapat ang ginawa ng mga mandirigmang nakalaban ng bayaning SAF troopers, lalo na at terorista naman ang pakay nila sa kanilang misyon.

Kahit saang anggulo tingnan, mali ang barilin sa ulo ang walang kalaban laban. Ikinagagalit iyon ni Allah (SWT). Sisingilin kayo sa oras ng kanyang paghuhusga.

February 12

Kaming mga sundalo, ayaw namin ng all out war na iminumungkahi ng iilang matatapang nating kababayan.

Bakit? Eh, matagal na nating sinubukan yan laban sa mga rebelde ngunit hindi naman umubra, at napakarami lang namamatay at nagsipaglayasan sa kanilang mga pamayanan. Yong mga namatayan ng tatay at kapatid ay malamang na bumabawi gamit ang karahasan.

Dagdag pa dyan, kaming mga sundalo naman ang unang mapasubo na makipagpatayan sa kapwa Pilipino kung hindi natin pagbigyan ng pagkakataon na magkaroon ang kapayapaan.
------------

My tolerance for war is zero, nada, blanko. More war means more hatred and intolerance, more violence and more government, more bureaucrats and war mongers ordering young people to shoot and kill other young people. More taxes and borrowings to finance endless fighting and destruction of properties.

For free marketers who advocate war, I question your belief in individual freedom. Why would you support further expansion of already BIG governments, to abdicate the use of reason and embrace more fighting and coercion?
------------

See also: 
MILF, Fallen 44 and Rule of Law, February 01, 2015 

MILF, PNP SAF and the Fallen 44, Part 4

This summary is not available. Please click here to view the post.

Sunday, February 15, 2015

IPR and Innovation 21: Recent News + IPN Assistance to Asian Think Tanks

Here are some recent opinions and reports about the value and  necessity of protecting and respecting intellectual property rights (IPR), related to the GIPC's 3rd International IP Index 2015 that was released only last week.
------------
(1) Elevating the Global Economy through IP
by Amy O'Connor 02/09/15

"Imagine spending years on research, experiencing a breakthrough, developing a new tool, technology, or medicine, but knowing that your innovation may not be protected. Many innovators around the world face this harsh reality. Intellectual property creates value – both socially and economically- by creating jobs, driving economic growth, and enriching our culture. Yet, despite these things, intellectual property protections around the globe remain inconsistent."

(2) From The Independent, 10 February 2015:

"Innovation and creativity allows for economic growth and job opportunities – and these need to be better protected encouraging further development. Easy access should not hinder creation, MEP Therese Comodini Cachia stressed, during a European parliamentary debate about intellectual property."

(3) From TGM, 10 February 2015
Reposted in MLI, same date.

“The benefits of a strong regime of property rights apply just as much to intangibles as to land and goods. We long ago worked out how to make the ownership of cars and houses and factories work, but we are not always as effective at protecting the interests of the originators of an idea, the creators of a work of art or design, or the inventors of a scientific process. Yet the benefits from clear ownership of intellectual property (IP) are every bit as clear as those flowing from the ownership of land and buildings. Those of us who watched the ease with which the private sector beat the government in mapping the human genome is but one recent example of the galvanising effect IP can have on investment in R&D.”


(4) From the Property Rights Alliance (PRA), 

Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) are:
- are Grounded in the Constitution
- are Deserving the Same Respect as Physical Property
- Promote Free Speech and Expression
- Are Vital to Economic Competitiveness
- Are Integral to Consumer Protection and National Security...


Sometime in 2009, I participated in a small group Asian think tanks' IPR and Innovation meeting in Singapore. It was organized by the International  Policy Network (IPN) then, headed by Prof. Julian Morris. I just discovered this photo in my laptop  today. Julian (6th from left) was accompanied by Philip Stevens (whom I last saw in 2012 in Penang, Malaysia, EMHN seminar) and Alec van Gelder (whom I last saw in 2010 in Sydney, ATR-PRA conference). There were at least eight of us participants from eight Asian countries then.


I am thankful to IPN and Julian for introducing me to this technical topic that is often mired with emotion and populism by various campaigners advocating disrespect, if  not killing, IPR.


I have written many articles on "IPR Abolition", "IPR and Innovation", and "IPR and Medicines" in this blog from 2008 to present.
-----------

Friday, February 13, 2015

Anti-Smoke Belching Racket, Part 7

The Anti-Smoke Belching Unit (ASBU) of various city governments in Metro Manila remains among the dreaded agencies of those local governments. Lots of extortion are happening there because no one seems to pass their smoke test. Thus, those who do not want to be harassed further have to offer something so that they can go to their destination. Here is one news from GMA News, March 14, 2012.


I myself gets terrified by these ASBU people whether in Makati, Pasay, Manila, etc. It is difficult to reason out with them. They flag you down for no sensible reason and  when you ask why, they say for "smoke test". See the various comments below, as well as in Parts 6, 5,... of this thread.


Below are some of the recent comments in this blog. Out of the nearly 1,900 articles in this blog, this post,  Anti-smoke belching Racket (January 17, 2011) has the most number of comments, 41. The Anti-Smoke Belching Racket, Part 2 (September 15, 2011) has 12 comments.

Friends and readers, can you help alert your friends in major media outlets like Imbestigador by Mike Enriquez, Isumbong mo kay Tulfo, etc., so they can help expose this continuing extortion and harassment of ordinary motorists by different ASBUs? Thank you.
------------

MGA MEDIA TULUNGAN NAMAN PO NINYO ANG MGA MALILIIN NATING KABABAYAN SIMPLE PROBLEM LANG NAMAN YAN KUMPARA SA MGA NANGYAYARI SA GOVERNMENT NGAYON MAY PA SPY-SPY. SALAMAT PO MGA MAHAL KONG TAGA MEDIA, MABUHAY PO KAYO. on Anti-smoke belching Racket
Anonymous,  on 2/12/15

MGA PARE KO ITUWID NAMAN NATIN KAHIT KONTI ANG MGA NASASAKUPAN NATIN OK LANG ANG RUMAKET PERO WAG NAMAN SAGABAL AT GARAPAL KAYO DIN BABALIK SA INYO YAN on Anti-smoke belching Racket
Anonymous,  on 2/12/15

Sa mga nakakataas na empleyado ng gobyerno ukol dito sa smoke belching kumilos naman po kayo maliit lang na suliranin ng mamayan ito nakaka abala sa kalye gumagawa ng traffic... nakakita na ba kayo ng hinuhuli ng smoke belcher ang sasakyan na wala namang usok at maiitim tapos may dumaan na sasakyan na ang baho na nang usok maitim pa ang usok hindi hinuli kung kayo kaya ang nakakita mataas na empleyado ng smoke belcher tatakpan nalang siguro ninyo ang ilong ninyo... ano po ba nasyon ninyo taga rito po ba kayo o taga magindanao din.... on Anti-smoke belching Racket
Anonymous,  on 2/12/15

talagang wala ng kwenta ang anti smoke belching natin kahit maayos ang sasakyan failed pa rin sa machine nila, bakit?. . .. . . dahil ang manchine nila ang palpak hindi naman accurate irebolution ba naman ng malakas di uusok katulad ng mga bunganga at bibig nila ng puno ng usok kabibibili ng sigarilyo dapat ang bibig nila ang testingin. . . pinepera nalang nila it's not the job ASBU concerned . . . napaka daming malalakas at mauusok na sasakyan hindi naman nila hinuhuli, bakit? mga pang pasahero lang walang perang pang lagay. . . hindi maganda sa lipunan yan marami na kaming kuha sa mga tao nyo na fake employee ng smoke belcher garapalan na kung ilalantad namin ito nakakahiya nanaman ang lipunan natin . . . ayusin nyo yan at alisin ang mga smoke belching sa kalye ayusin sa LTO at para walang smoke belcher. . . on Anti-smoke belching Racket
Anonymous,  on 2/12/15

i was about to post about the ASBU pasig team, but i was disappointed that i have read the same problem to complain, what is the ASBU action about this,, wala lang, ganun lang e patanggal nyo na ang site ninyo nakakasira lang ang servisyo publiko nyo sa mga tao nyo, walang problema sabihing nyong ginagawa nyo lang ang trabaho nyo pero sana gawin nyong tama at patas, ilang jeep ang dumadaan sa harapan nila at kulang nalang mangitim ng husto mga butas ng mga ilong ng mga asbu enforcer lalo na dyan malapit sa IPI hinuhuli ba nila hindi-yung alam nilang makakakolekkta sila yun ang titingnan nila regardless kung kahapon mo lang binili ang sasakyan-Kaya panawagan lang sa mga taga ASBU paki orient nyo mga tao nyo na maging patas kahit sa kanilang sasakyan gawin ang gingawa nila kung di sila aalma. maging patas lang. nakaksira kayo sa deparytamento at uniporme suot nyo. on Anti-Smoke Belching Racket, Part 2
Anonymous,  on 2/5/15

just so you know, the MAKATI ASBUs are back. on Anti Smoke Belching Racket, Part 6
Anonymous,  on 10/20/14

tangalin na ang walang ka kwenta kwentang raket na yan.. pinag kakaperahan lang namn d manghuli ng mga sasakyan na talgang mausok sa daan.. d yung sasakyan nila tapos aapakan ng todo para umusok kahit sino d papasa sa pinag-gagawa nila.. tapos pinaka mababang lagay 500 pa pag ayaw hayup sa mahal ng tubos.. on Anti-smoke belching Racket
markismai laquindanum,  on 4/30/14

sana ilabas ang guidelines sa pagcheck ng sasakyan sa smoke belching ang alam ko bawal sila umupo sa driver side at sila ang magrevolution ng makina mo kaya todo todo ang apak ng accelarator kaya walang papasa sasakyan maski na bago bili on Anti-Smoke Belching Racket, Part 3
virus,  on 2/10/14
------------

See also:
Anti-Smoke Belching Racket, Part 3, November 25, 2011
Anti-Smoke Belching Racket, Part 4, September 25, 2012

Anti-Smoke Belching Racket, Part 5, April 02, 2013

MMDA, LGUs and Towing Racket, November 26, 2012 

Thursday, February 12, 2015

Welfarism 31: More CCT and Subsidy Programs Won't Solve Self-inflicted Poverty

More welfare and subsidy programs for the poor, are they really needed?

Let us count the existing ones, at least the major subsidy programs:

1. Books and education for the poor, via DepEd, CHED, TESDA, LGUs.
2. Medicines and healthcare for the poor, via DOH, PhilHealth, LGUs, UP-PGH, PCSO/PAGCOR health vouchers, WHO/USAID/WB/ADB foreign aid in health.
3. Housing and relocation for the poor, via NHA, PagIBIG, NHMFC, LGUs, etc.
4. Land redistribution and irrigation for the poor, via DAR, NIA, DPWH, LGUs, etc.
5. Tractors, credit, seeds for the poor, via DA, LGUs, etc.
6. Rural roads and bridges for the poor, via DPWH, DAR, AFP Engg., LGUs, etc.
7. Rice subsidy for the poor, via NFA, DA
8. Train fare subsidy and electric tricycles for the poor, via DOTC, MRT, LRT, DENR, LGUs, etc.
9. Upland and coastal reforestation for the poor, via DENR, BFAR, LGUs, etc.
10. Pension and death benefits for the poor, via SSS, GSIS, LGUs.
11. Condoms and pills for the poor, via DOH, PopCom.
12. Cash transfer for the poor, via DSWD, LGUs.
others.

If these huge and continuing subsidy programs were effective, at least for the first six, there should have been no need for the other welfare programs, especially the conditional cash transfer (CCT) program.

Given this trend of increasing or expanding welfare programs, it will not be far out that soon there will be iPad for the poor and 2nd-hand cars for the poor.

The creation of new welfare/subsidy program means past subsidy programs were either ineffective or failures. If government is less wasteful and more efficient, it should have scrapped or drastically shrank some existing but inefficient subsidy programs, before it invents and implements new subsidy programs.

What is happening now, with the blessings or direct promotion of the UN and its MDGs, is that one welfare after another is being invented and implemented.

People should have more personal and parental responsibility in running their own lives and their households.

Pwedeng painom-inom, yosi-yosi, sugal-sugal, kasi ang edukasyon ng anak at family healthcard ay hindi nila responsibilidad, entitlement nila at dapat ibigay sa kanila? May pambili ng alak at yosi, may pang pusta sa mahjong, sabong at jueteng, pero walang pang contribute sa PhilHealth card?

This is not to say or generalize that all poor people are lazy, drunkards or gamblers. Many are but not all. Poverty can be caused by nature, like a strong typhoon and big flood destroying the house, car/tractor, crops and other assets and investments. Government welfare programs are justified and needed, with time frame.

It is different  when poverty is self-inflicted. Like those who do not want to work, or they work 5 days a week but also party 5-6 nights a week and have zero savings, or spend all of the savings in one or two big party and have nothing or very little left.

In the second case, even if CCT is expanded 10x or 20x what they get now, poverty will persist. Thus, there should be poverty for the lazy and irresponsible, and inequality is not exactly bad as it rewards the hardworking and ambitious and penalizes the lazy and irresponsible.

Meanwhile, this news last week explains why more and forever welfare programs can create moral hazards problem.


----------

See also:
Welfarism 9: Conditional Cash Transfer (CCT), November 12, 2010 
Welfarism 22: CCT, 4Ps and Central Planning, October 14, 2012 
Welfarism 29: Is Poverty Government Corruption-Created or Self-Inflicted?, October 05, 2014 
Welfarism 30: Big Government and Corruption of People's Values, December 06, 2014