EMHN Executive Director, Philip Stevens, partnered with two young economists from South Africa, Urbach and Wills, in producing this econometric paper.Here is the paper's Abstract::
A recurrent theme of the academic literature and wider public discourse is that free trade harms the poor by promoting economic inequality and insecurity, polluting the environment and making processed foods more widely available. All of these factors are deemed to be deleterious to health.
However, there has been little empirical evidence to support these assertions, in particular the relationship between free trade and health. This is an important relationship, as it tells us more about the effect of economic policies on human welfare than bald statistics related to GDP...
Contrary to much of the literature, our analysis finds that free trade does in fact promote better health outcomes, with the relationship particularly pronounced for lower-income countries.
There are two mechanisms that might be responsible for this relationship. On the one hand, trade promotes economic growth, which in turn provides greater sums for individuals to improve their living conditions and for authorities to spend on public health measures such as sanitation and universal vaccination. Another mechanism is ‘knowledge spillover’, wherein international trade increases the global diffusion of both knowledge and products that improve health -- ranging from the basics of germ theory to modern pharmaceuticals and medical devices.
It's a better and cool explanation than the trade-paranoid argument. More trade means more options, more choices for the consumers including patients. Less trade means less options, simple. These two charts are self-expalanatory: more trade means more economic activities, more wealth for the people and thus, the average life expectancy is rising. The second chart shows that more trade, more economic prosperity translates to less infant mortality.
See the full, 16 pages report here.
------------
See also:EMHN 3: Penang Workshop Report, September 10, 2012
EMHN 4: Free Trade, TPP and Public Health Protection, January 13, 2013
EMHN 5: Free Trade and Markets in Healthcare, January 17. 2013
EMHN 6: Fake Medicines in Asia, February 15, 2013
1 comment:
oh, so reading it i learned that it was fixed effects, should should help some, but its still possible that something weird is going on. its probably a better idea to us IV anyways for trade openness.
also fishy is that they didnt provide any numbers for their regression table. the interaction effect is positive, so we dont know if the total effect is positive or negative. (they dont tell the reader).
Post a Comment