* This is my article in BusinessWorld on November 20, 2018.
See also:
BWorld 265, Integrated PPP vs Hybrid PPP: The case of Kaliwa Dam, November 15, 2018
“Every family
should have the right to spend their money, after tax, as they wish, and not as
the government dictates. Let us extend choice, extend the will to choose and
the chance to choose.”
— Margaret Thatcher, UK Prime Minister (1979-1990)
Advocates of forced collectivism, health socialism in
particular, will be unhappy with that advice from the Iron Lady of the United
Kingdom. For them, health care, education, many other services are not personal
and parental responsibility but state responsibility. So the state is justified
to slap tax-tax-tax anywhere, regulate-prohibit anytime, because the state has
“endless responsibilities” that often lead to endless abuses and corruption.
1. UNIVERSAL HEALTH CARE (UHC) BILL ALLOWING MORE
BENEFITS TO DIRECT CONTRIBUTORS.
In a column yesterday in BusinessWorld, “Watching out for
UHC” by Ms. Diosana of AER, they attacked Sen. Ralph Recto because he “intends
to give more PhilHealth benefits to those who can pay more. Under the section
“Entitlement to Benefits” of the approved SB 1896, he inserted this provision:
“PhilHealth shall provide additional NHIP benefits for direct contributors,
where applicable.… the two-tiered benefit scheme will also exacerbate health
inequity in the country.”
This market-oriented reform initiated by the Senator is
correct. There should be a two- or multiple-tiered system in health care,
inequality in contribution should lead to inequality in getting benefits.
Socialism wants inequality in contribution but equality in social results.
If people can afford to buy alcohol, tobacco, fatty food,
nice cellphones, etc., it is assumed that they should also have some resources
to buy health insurance that will augment state-sponsored health care.
2. RICE TARIFFICATION BILL.
SB 1998 led by Sen. Cynthia Villar will untie the heavy
hands of the state and its bureaucracy to restrict and prohibit free trade in
rice. By replacing high quantitative restrictions (QRs) with tariffs, the NFA’s
monopoly power to import through its favored and crony traders will be clipped.
Free trade in rice means freedom to choose from various
rice exporters in Asia, and freedom for consumers to choose cheaper rice, which
will help reduce inflation rate.
3. ENERGY VIRTUAL ONE-STOP SHOP (EVOSS) BILL.
SB 1439 by Sen. Sherwin Gatchalian is meant to reduce the
widespread bureaucratic delays in power plant construction caused by various
government agencies, national and local, which lead to fewer power plants than
potential, and higher electricity prices for consumers. The delays and costs
caused by the bureaucracy can be horrible, based on the actual experience of a
hydro plant developer (see table).
A total of 359 signatures, from 74 regulatory agencies
and bureaus, involving 20 different laws, requiring 43 different contracts,
certifications, endorsements and licenses.
So the EVOSS bill will create a single electronic
network-based platform under the DoE, and power plant proponents and developers
will submit all documents and permits and the respective agencies are given
timeline to act on applications, and if they fail to act on the timeline, the
application is deemed approved. Clipping the long tentacles of bureaucracies
and corruption.
4. REPEALING MANDATORY CONTINUING PROFESSIONAL
DEVELOPMENT (CPD) BILL.
SB 2073 by Sen. Ralph Recto intends to lift this
obligatory and coercive training that costs professionals huge money. R.A.
10912 or the CPD Act of 2016 requires professionals to earn 45 CPD units of
seminars and trainings that cost between P10,000 to P30,000 per person every
three years, otherwise they cannot renew their PRC license.
That CPD Act and its mandatory order is lousy for at
least two reasons: (a) Professionals normally attend various seminars,
conferences and trainings in the course of their work, and (b) the market, the
customers are the best judges and natural regulators. Lousy professionals are
punished by customer dissatisfaction that is easily spread through social media,
they lose clients.
There are many anti-market, statist or state-worship
bills in the Senate of course but those proposals and bills that advance
market-oriented reforms need to be highlighted.
---------------
See also:
BWorld 265, Integrated PPP vs Hybrid PPP: The case of Kaliwa Dam, November 15, 2018
BWorld 266, Inflation, GDP and Duterte, November 16, 2018
BWorld 267, Poverty data vs banking, mobile phones and Internet access, November 23, 2018
No comments:
Post a Comment