Monday, August 13, 2012

Fat-Free Econ 20: Flooding and Global Cooling

* This is my article yesterday in TV5's news portal,
http://www.interaksyon.com/business/40229/fat-free-economics-flooding-and-global-cooling
----------

More rains and floods are indicators of global cooling, not warming. Many campaigners of anthropogenic global warming or its cousin, the man-made climate change, argue however that less rain and more drought is an indicator of AGW, even as they claim that more rain and flooding is also an indicator of AGW.

It is irrational to argue that less rain and more rain, less flood and more flood, less typhoon and more typhoon, less snow and more snow, are all indicators of AGW and CC. The argument given by the AGW campaigners is that with a warming world, there is more drought and less rain. Fine. But they later added that a warming planet causes more water evaporation from the oceans, in turn forming more rain clouds that cause heavy rains.

Before probing deeper into the inconsistency and dishonesty of the above claims, let us briefly review the flooding that hit Metro Manila and many other provinces of the country early this week. Interaksyon.com reported that more than 540,000 families or more than two million people have been affected and some 60 people have died of drowning, landslides and related catastrophe.

Below are two charts of the sea surface temperature or SST anomaly, a “deviation from the normal” temperature, as of this week (upper image) and last week (lower image). The Philippines as of August 9, 2012 had a temperature anomaly or divergence of between -0.5 and -1.5 degrees centigrade, meaning colder than normal. This weather pattern also affected many Northeast and Southeast Asian countries, down to northern Australia. El Nino has actually resumed since around June this year after almost two years of La Nina, yet many parts of the Pacific Ocean still have colder than normal conditions.

The lower image shows SST anomaly from another source, as of August 1, 2012 or last week. The Philippines had between 0.5 and 1.0 degrees centigrade colder than normal temperature that time, especially the northern and eastern parts of Luzon. A big part of the Indian Ocean had between zero and 1.0 degree centigrade warmer than normal temperature, or the average SST from 1971 to 2000.

Sources: Upper image: http://www.osdpd.noaa.gov/data/sst/anomaly/anomnight.current.gif, Lower image: http://www1.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/wksst/5.gif

Determining whether the planet is entering a La Nina or El Nino condition is based on the SST anomaly in Pacific Ocean’s Nino region 3.4 shown in upper left photo below. It comprises the biggest and central part of the Pacific Ocean, which comprises about a third of the planet’s total surface area, and larger than all landmass and continents combined.

Images from upper right clockwise represent the SST anomaly for Nino 3.4 over (a) last five years, (b) last 12 years, and (c) last 62 years. It is clear here that there is no such thing as “unprecedented warming” in the world’s biggest ocean, that it was a natural cycle of warming-cooling-warming-cooling, each phase lasting for a few years. So the statement of AGW campaigners like the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Al Gore, World Wildlife Fund, Greenpeace and many other groups and institutions, of “unprecedented warming” or “unequivocal warming” is simply not true, that they have been dishonest to the public.


Source: WUWT’s ENSO Page, http://wattsupwiththat.com/reference-pages/enso/

Let us review air temperature, particularly the troposphere, the lowest portion of Earth’s atmosphere, and the stratosphere, the second layer after the troposphere. From satellite data interpreted separately by the University of Alabama in Huntsville and the Remote Sensing System, global troposphere temperature anomaly, or divergence from the normal temperature, was generally rising from 1979 when satellite data was first gathered. But if one will plot a linear trend starting from around 2000 up to the present, a flat-lining, if not decline in global temperature can be observed.

In the stratosphere though, the trend over the past few decades has been a temperature fall or global cooling at the second layer of the planet’s atmosphere.


Sources (from top left, clockwise): UAH, http://www.drroyspencer.com/wp-content/uploads/UAH_LT_current.gif, RSS data, WUWT’s Atmospheric Page, http://wattsupwiththat.com/reference-pages/atmosphere/

In combined land surface plus sea surface temperature anomalies as gathered by HadCRUT data sets, the trend from 2000 to the present is flat, or slightly declining or cooling.


Source: http://woodfortrees.org/plot/hadcrut3gl/from:2000/to:2012/plot/hadcrut3gl/from:2000/to:2012/trend

Finally, let us compare the climate projections by the UN IPCC vis-a-vis actual temperature anomaly. Below, the upper photo shows a huge divergence between the two as the global air temperature has started to flatten, then descend in the middle of the last decade.

Lower photo shows a disconnect or absence of “causality” between carbon dioxide emission and global air temperature. As the former keeps rising to nearly 400 parts per million, the global air temperature from January 2002 to July 2012 was declining or cooling by around 0.03 degrees centigrade per decade.


Sources: Upper graph: http://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2012/07/30/joe-bastardi-weighs-in-on-the-watts-muller-scuffle/, Lower graph: http://friendsofscience.org/assets/documents/FOS%20Essay/GlobalTroposphereTemperaturesAverage.jpg

Thus, there is dishonesty on the part of the UN and its climate and environmental bodies – IPCC, FCCC, UNEP, WMO, among the major ones, along with Al Gore, the big environmental NGOs like WWF and Greenpeace.

Before, they were telling the public to prepare for more drought and rising ocean due to the “alarming ice melt/loss” in both the Arctic, Greenland and Antarctica. Recently they reversed gear and now say that the public should prepare for more rains. There are many negative implications for the lousy analysis and projections by the warming camp. Among them are the following:

- One, creation of carbon taxes, stricter environmental and energy regulations regarding the use and consumption of fossil fuel and other carbon-emitting vehicles and power plants;

- Two, creation of many new climate bureaucracies. Here in the Philippines, among those newly created bodies purportedly to “fight climate change” aside from the Department of Environment and Natural Resources are the Climate Change Commission, National Renewable Energy Board, NDRRMC, and many other climate offices and bureaucracies at the local government levels;

- Three, contracting billions of dollars of climate and energy loans from the World Bank and the Asian Development Bank to help “save the planet.” At a time when our public debt is already at a high level, about 40 percent of GDP, expanding the government debt for some phony and unnecessary program is bad public policy.

The government should instead use more money to dredge creeks, rivers and lakes, as we expect more rains and more floods, in fact worse than what we have experienced so far. Global warming and cooling phases last for several decades, not just a few years. Let the strong flood and rain water move faster to the ocean so that flooding of many streets and residential areas in the country will be significantly controlled and minimized.

Lastly, let us build more dams. Projections like lack of water that can trigger future conflict between and among countries and people are unrealistic. What we experience is too much water with more frequent heavy rains. Government need not build more dams. Let private corporations, real estate developers build more dams, small to medium size ones to minimize dislodging upland dwellers and cultural minorities. More dams will impound more floodwater while ensuring steady flow of water for the public, from ordinary households to rice farmers needing more irrigation, or small hydro power plants.

Global cooling will spawn more flooding, possibly more severe and more catastrophic than what we have experienced so far. Let climate realism reverse the damage and uncover the intellectual dishonesty of climate alarmist groups.
----------

See also:
Climate Tricks 11: Coal and James Hansen, RE Law and the WWF, July 18, 2012
Climate Tricks 12: More Flooding is Caused by Warming, July 21, 2012
Climate Tricks 13: Block Skeptics and Keep Fooling the Public, July 25, 2012
Climate Tricks 14: Flooding, El Nino and Arctic Ice, August 08, 2012
Climate Tricks 15: AGW Fiction, Avoiding Natural Climate Drivers, August 12, 2012



Fat-Free Econ 18: Healthcare Corruption and Physician Entanglement, July 30, 2012
Fat-Free Econ 19: Population Decontrol, Not RH Bill, August 06, 2012

Rotary Notes 5: Relief Operations in Lower Bicutan, Taguig

The recent heavy flooding in Metro Manila and other neighboring provinces resulted to some three million people who have been directly affected. Our Rotary Club of Taguig Fort Bonifacio (RI District 3830), through the efforts of President Rose Antonio, partnered with RC Makati President Reuben Valerio, in distributing food items to victims of flooding in Lower Bicutan, Taguig City, last Friday, August 10.

Upper photo: RC Makati President Reuben, clubmate Carmen Penalosa, Rose's son, President Rose, me, clubmate Eric Lucero, and Past District Governor (PDG) Sid Garcia. Most of these photos are from President Rose's camera.


We had a short chat with President Reuben. He said that for their club, money was not a problem as they received lots of cash donations from club members, also from their brother clubs abroad. District Governor-Elect (DGE) Robert Kuan for instance, received a call from his classmate DGE from an RI District in Taiwan and asked how things are in the country. His classmate simply donated $5,000 just for the relief-donations. This is one thing I like in Rotary or other voluntary charity organization, some rich individuals and Rotarians here in the country or abroad have no qualms in digging resources from their own pockets and give away to charity at zero politics, zero taxation, zero coercion involved.

There were four of us from our club, plus President Rose's son and driver. This is her pick up, full of food items for distribution. Eric's car is nice here, small but full of items for donation. I hitched a ride with him.


This is the small village in Lower Bicutan that we visited. The floodwater has not receded yet, two days after the heavy rains have stopped.


Lower photo, these children are in danger of getting leptospirosis and other water-borne diseases as the water is muddy and dirty.


The Barangay Health Worker (BHW), a city hall employee assigned to barangays to provide health and sanitation programs and services, estimated that there were less than 100 households in this area. The food packages we brought were just enough for them. Plus extra food packages for other affected families outside of this small village, delivered at the BHW office.


We were done distributing the goods in about 20 minutes. Thanks to my club, thanks to Rotary Club of Makati. We have done our small share in helping the flood affected families.

More volunteerism and civil society role, that is what we need in building a peaceful and dynamic society. Not in having more government, more coercion.
----------

See also:
Rotary Notes 1: Barangay Roads and Solar Panels, August 30, 2010


CSOs and State 10: The Role of Civil Society, June 15, 2010
CSOs and State 11: Rights and Responsibilities, Liberal Civil Society, July 11, 2010

Sunday, August 12, 2012

Population Control 11: Church Coercion vs. State Coercion

After figuring in a number of debates this week and in previous weeks and months, about the Reproductive Health (RH) bill, this is one issue that is emerging: many pro-RH people hate what they call as "Church coercion", of demonizing people who support the RH while getting more donations and fees from the public. On the other hand, among the arguments that the anti-RH people use without mentioning any Church arguments (like I do), is highlighting State coercion. I noticed that when I raised this issue, a number of pro-RH are muted.

I am posting three threads of facebook debates below: from my wall, from Ferdie Bolislis' wall, and from Raissa Robles' wall. Again, another good reading materials for those who want to see the pros and cons of the bill. About 13 pages long, Enjoy reading.
---------

(1) My facebook wall
exchanges from August 5 to 7, 2012:

People are assets, not liabilities. Government should focus on promulgating the rule of law, not in expanding bureaucracies and in population control,



Valli Faith Estacion Bibit Korak! Government should spend more on teaching your child about math and science and language, than it will on teaching your child about contraceptives. In the end, sex education is not really about giving information--- but rather about a politics of despair where the sex "experts" hope for some damage control in the areas of teen pregnancy and disease.

Doods De Los Reyes I think people can be even more of an asset instead of a liability if they don't have to scrimp for every last peso to buy basic commodities and pay for shelter and their children's education. Governments can allocate more resources to infrastructure if they don't have to subsidize so much for social welfare.

Nonoy Oplas Doods, if you checked my article, I showed there photos of (a) business permits required by various government bureaucracies, and (b) private property by the poor confiscated by some government agencies because they don't have enough government permits. Point -- people want to stand on their own, to get out of poverty, but government says it's a criminal activity unless they get various permits first.

Doods De Los Reyes Hi Nonoy, I think some of the points you made in your article are overly simplistic. For instance, "a bigger population means more workers and more entrepreneurs; more producers and more consumers" is not necessarily true -- not unless you mean the sort of labor and micro-entrepreneurship that does not require formal education. How many streetsweepers, ambulant vendors and fish vendors do we really need? Plus, it disagrees with your former point regarding overconsumption and overexploitation of resources -- more production is good for business but is arguably not good for sustainability of natural resources. It is also a big leap to go from population control to people remaining single and not having kids -- Filipinos will still marry and have kids, but maybe through a reeducation about family size vs economics they will think twice about having more than one kid. The notion that a lot of people will die anyway from natural disasters speaks more about overpopulation than the need to keep up our birth rate -- a lot of these people die because they live along riverbanks, under bridges, and in other unsafe areas not designated for residential purposes.

Nonoy Oplas hmmm, quickly Doods.
1. More people, more workers, more entrepreneurs "not necessarily true". Really? As of April 2012, total employed Filipinos, salary workers + managers + company owners = 37.84 million people, that's big.
2. I used the "over-exploitation of resources" in satire, not my own point of view.
3. I mentioned people being single or married/in relationship but have no kids, in relation to the suggestion of the bill that couples shd target only 2 kids. To keep the population momentum, some couples need to have plenty of children to balance replacement of couples who have no kids.
4. People living in riverbanks, under bridges, etc. is example of government failure. LGUs should enforce their zoning or residential regulations but they don't. That is why I expressly argued, govt shd focus on promulgating the rule of law, not in limiting population.

RUM 7: Leptospirosis and Doxycycline

Leptospirosis and other water-borne diseases are very common during heavy flooding where tens or even hundreds of thousands of houses are submerged in water. People have no option but to walk in dirty waters and hence, risk getting any of these diseases.

Like treating infectious and pediatric diseases, I grant that there is government role in dealing with this kind of disease outbreak. I am no health anarchist, unlike some other shades of free marketers. I post below two articles, one a DOH advisory posted in facebook today, the potentials of doxycycline in dealing with lepto and related diseases, but also its limits. There is rational use of medicines (RUM) here, it cannot be used by (a) pregnant women, (b) children below 8 years old, and according to wiki, (c) "taking doxycycline with food and dairy products may decrease the amount of medication absorbed."

I am also posting portions of Reiner Gloor's article on the subject, to show healthcare-based civil society role in dealing with this and related diseases.


(1) DOH Advises Public on Drug Prices

Press Release - 12 August 2012
by Department of Health (Philippines) on Sunday, August 12, 2012 at 8:34am ·

Health Secretary Enrique T. Ona today provided some pointers for the general public in purchasing doxycycline and other drugs and medicines, in the light of the expected surge in leptospirosis and other diseases due to flooding caused by the southwest monsoon.

“We want the public to be able to make informed decisions and get the best prices on doxycycline and other drugs and medicines”, Ona said.

Doxycycline is an antibiotic that is currently recommended to prevent leptospirosis among those with increased risk of exposure.

The Department of Health has already distributed free doxycycline for rescue and relief teams and residents in evacuation centers. Individuals with similar risk should consult a physician prior to intake.

However, doxycycline does not totally protect against leptosirosis. "Those who will develop fever even after taking doxycycline should go to their doctor for examination. Doxycyclin is not recommended for pregnant women and children below eight years of age," Ona explained....

At present, the price of generic doxycycline 100 mg capsules varies from P2.00 to P 15.00 depending on the manufacturer. Generic doxycycline 100 mg capsules are available in government hospital drugstores and commercial drugstores.


(2) Health during disasters

Medicine Cabinet -- Reiner Gloor
Posted on 05:55 PM, August 09, 2012
http://www.bworldonline.com/weekender/content.php?id=56533

RECENT extreme weather disturbances have recently resulted in loss in lives and property in Metro Manila and the rest of Luzon.

The Pharmaceutical and Healthcare Association of the Philippines (PHAP), through the PHAPCares Foundation, earlier called on its members to again extend help to victims of massive floods in Metro Manila and affected Luzon provinces. Last week, the PHAPCares Foundation turned over P500,000 worth of medicines to National Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Council (NDRMMC). In coordination with our government partners, we intend to roll out a medicine donation caravan to assist the disaster victims....

Realizing that people are physically and emotionally vulnerable to health risks during calamities, PHAP, through the PHAPCares Foundation, signed a Memorandum of Agreement (MoA) with the NDRRMC to renew the industry commitment to provide needed medicines during calamities. The aim of the "Gamot Agad Program" is to deliver essential and life-saving medicines to victims at the quickest possible time alongside the other equally crucial relief items such as food, water and blankets.

Under the MoA, industry members will provide the government P50 million, or P10 million annually, for the next five years worth of life-saving medicines for use during disasters and emergencies.

Dr. Posadas said that common medicines needed during these times are those that afford remedies to common ailments such as anti-pyretic/analgesic/anti-inflammatory medicines, decongestants and expectorants, anti-diarrheal/oral rehydrating solutions, antibiotics and topical medicines for wounds.

One common rule to remember is that medicines should be kept in a secure container that will shield them against the elements. One simple way is to put these medicines in a plastic container, tightly sealed to protect the medicines, especially from moisture and dirt. Aside from the medicines, some basic medications for wounds like alcohol, hydrogen peroxide, betadine, cotton, scissors, dressing tape, gauze, topical antibiotics and elastic bandage are useful....
--------

See also:
RUM 3: On Combining Drug Molecules and Alaxan FR, February 03, 2012
RUM 4: Dealing with Drug-Resistant Diseases, April 24, 2012
RUM 5- Cheaper Medicines and AMR, May 08, 2012
RUM 6: Pharmacovigilance and ADR, July 20, 2012

Weekend Fun 39: Funny Photos in Manila Floods

Some funny photos I saw in facebook, other sites, in recent days. None of these came from my camera. Filipino humor can remain notorious even in some catastrophic situations.


Upper right photo, flooding in the 60s.


Below, I posted this earlier in Manila Flooding, August 2012.


Lower left photo, I think this was during the typhoon Ondoy flooding in September 2009. But this photo keeps circulating in facebook, other sites.


Happy weekend.
---------

See also:
Weekend Fun 31: Filipino Shop Signs, March 17, 2012
Weekend Fun 32: Angry Birds, Angry Taxpayers, March 24, 2012
Weekend Fun 35: Miriam D. Santiago is Cute, June 03, 2012
Weekend Fun 36: The Karl Marx Mastercard, July 06, 2012
Weekend Fun 37: On Fighting Poverty, July 07, 2012
Weekend Fun 38: Skylab Motorcycles, July 14, 2012

Climate Tricks 15: AGW Fiction, Avoiding Natural Climate Drivers

After the heavy flooding suffered by millions of people in Metro Manila and many other provinces over early this week, a friend in facebook posted this the other day and dared a debate. I asked his permission to post the exchange in this blog, zero alteration, pure copy-paste, he did not reply, a silent No.

In the spirit of making this debate become more transparent to others who care to read and learn, I am posting portions of the exchanges, but I removed the names. So readers, focus on the message and arguments, not the names. This is the original challenge by S:
Now that things are starting to normalize, I would like to hear anybody who would dispute that climate change is just a political ploy of "watermelon" (their words, not mine) environmentalists to ask more money, and demand more government intervention.

Nonoy Oplas Climate change is natural, warming-cooling-warming-cooling. We're in a period of global cooling, hence, more rains, more flood, and worse to come, http://funwithgovernment.blogspot.com/2012/05/climate-tricks-8-catastrophic-scare-for.html


S It's a natural cycle, yes. But it is being hastened by human behavior, especially now with increased industrial activities.

PM: we are not in a period of global cooling. ang mga sobrang rainfall ay dala rin ng global warming, tulad ng paglamig ng ibang lugar dahil natutunaw ang mga yelo. kaya lately ay mas ginagamit na ang "climate change" kaysa "global warming" para hindi na ma-confuse.

Nonoy Oplas It's obvious you did not check the paper I posted. Explain the following:
a. absence of causality, if any, between flat-lining global temp while CO2 concentration is rising.
b. rule out explicitly, the effect of natural factors like the Sun and GCRs on climate.

PM  sorry, mr. oplas, pero i think you should submit your paper (though puro kopya lang sa kung anu-anong source) to the UNFCCC to prove your point. i've been to their sessions and intersessionals at laging durog sa diskusyon ang mga nagsasabi ng mga sinasabi mo.

Nonoy Oplas PM, explain (a) absence of causality, if any, between flat-lining global temp while CO2 concentration is rising.
(b) rule out explicitly, the effect of natural factors like the Sun and GCRs on climate.
Here's more, http://funwithgovernment.blogspot.com/2012/01/climate-tricks-2-solar-activities-tsi.html





Friday, August 10, 2012

Population Control 10: Anger and Coercion in Pushing RH Bill

My article in interksyon, "Population decontrol, not RH bill",
http://www.interaksyon.com/business/39513/fat-free-economics-population-decontrol-not-rh-bill,
gathered lots of comments, mostly critical of my paper by the pro-RH camp. Copy-pasting them here, typo errors included, zero alteration. This will be a good reading material for those who are still learning the pros and cons of the bill. Some of the pro-RH here are full of angst, anger and intolerance, resorting to name calling and insults why their very "bright" idea encounters opposition.

Thread #2 below has the most recent exchanges, until today. Exchanges in other threads have stopped a few days ago. Long exchanges, about 19 pages total, so get your favorite snacks.
---------

Thread 1:

Baron Von Doughiestahl 
First of all, you have to understand that the HSBC report is NOT PROPHECY, it is just a projection. And not only is it just a projection (or "guesstimate", as Anti RH Bill people would like to call the Guttmacher Institute's study on Abortion in the Philippines), it is not even a CONSENSUS projection by financial bodies out there.

Second, HSBC's projections only show the size of the economy like the GDP, but it does NOT tell us their projected economic indicators for the QUALITY OF LIFE by 2050, like the PER CAPITA INCOME, for example. Or the POVERTY RATE. For me, the size of the economy of a country is no use if the people living in it has low per capita incomes, and high poverty rates.

The "People are asset" argument is hogwash. You need people, but only up to a certain point, one that the economy can EFFECTIVELY SUPPORT. Look at all our more progressive Asian neighbors. Every single one of them advocate the use of Artificial Contraceptives because they know that too many people will worsen poverty.

Nonoy Oplas People are not assets? Who watch the kids, clean the house, of many middle class and rich people here including the pro-population control camp, robots? government bureaucrats?

True that HSBC report is projection, like IMF or ADB or UN or NEDA projections, of GDP size only. Disprove that govt prevents the poor from improving their lives via endless bureaucracies. The photos are posted for your convenience.

Ike Aseoche Nonoy Oplas Assets should be able to generate income. That is why those with too many children use them for medicancy. I'm sure their quality of life is so great.

Let's just tell everyone that you will have more children and therefore you have the more assets. And therefore, you will raise your quality of life. How many assets do you want?

Dismala Carmen Dear Mr Oplas as the author of that article I would like to ask you, are you familiar with this quote?

"If it moves, tax it. If it moves further, regulate it. If it stops moving, subsidize it." -- Ronald Reagan

Now back to your article

(b) reducing the welfare dependency and various entitlements mentality

Some how that's not subsidizing at all.

Furthermore, overpopulation isn't the number of people. I mean 100 million is chump change compared to the population of China.

Overpopulation is better defined as the resources of the country over the population.

Given that you are wholly ignorant to the minimum wage, profit from micro businesses and the required family income to support at least a family of 3, I'd like to ask you this:

Do you seriously think that the Philippine economy will be able to give out salaries that can support families as large as 6 or even 12?

You haven't done your research well.

Baron Von Doughiestahl @Nonoy Oplas, as I said, you need people, but only up to a certain point, and that point means the number of people that an economy is able to support. In our case, we obviously have gone beyond that.

26 years after EDSA, what happened in a country that the Catholic Church has insisted that Artificial Contraceptives should not be promoted and distributed? 26 years after EDSA, the country is still a Basketcase, with the lowest per capita income in Asia, and the highest Poverty Rate in Asia.

There are 5 million CHILD LABORERS in the Philippines (source: http://www.abs-cbnnews.com/-depth/07/20/12/infographic-still-not-child-labor-free), children who instead of going to school are forced to work to help their families earn a living.

You say the people are assets, how can they be "assets" when they are wallowing in desperate poverty like this: - http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3347/3299674549_3cef13ed9b.jpg

Nonoy Oplas Ike, see the photos again of business bureaucracies, the confiscation of property rights of the poor by certain government agencies simply because they don't have the energy or resources or patience to deal with those bureaucracies. Then accuse again the poor of being unable to generate income by themselves.

Dismala, that Reagan quote is among my favorites. Given that you are wholly ignorant of the potentials of civil society to voluntarily help the poor to improve their productivity, cases of many poor people with many children breaking out of poverty on their own, then the solution is always more government, more government, more government.

Baron, I have zero religious or church argument for my position, just plain economics. For the second time, I say, "Disprove that govt prevents the poor from improving their lives via endless bureaucracies. The photos are posted for your convenience."

Thursday, August 09, 2012

Dirty Creeks 3: Divisoria, Paco

Since governments, national and local, often cite environmental protection, or ensuring a clean environment for the people, as among their important functions, I started the "Dirty Creeks" series here, and this is the third.

Below, the creek in Divisoria, Manila. I took these photos last June 10, 2012. Ugly and dirty. The only consolation is that it could be dirtier, if there were plenty of floating solid wastes. At least here, there were only a few.


Below, photos are from a story by Dennis Villages, "Estero de Paco: Life Along the River" posted in May 2009, http://dennisvillegas.blogspot.com/2009/03/estero-de-paco-life-along-river_08.html. Really dirty and ugly.


Here is the continuation of Dennis Villegas' story and photos, "Views from a Dead River" dated May 29, 2009,  http://dennisvillegas.blogspot.com/2009/03/estero-de-paco-views-from-polluted.html.


I do not know if this creek or estero has been finally cleaned or not.

Nonetheless, it is clear that at one time or another, there is government failure, not just "market failure" that we  hear often, in ensuring a cleaner environment. Some people will say that those garbage were produced by the people and individuals themselves, so it's market failure. True, but governments made rules against such indiscriminate throwing of garbage. Since government did not fully implement those rules and laws, then that is clear example of government failure or omission of function.
---------

See also:
Dirty creeks 1: Makati, January 18, 2011
(Not so) Dirty Creeks 2: Makati again, August 09, 2012