* This is my article in BusinessWorld last Tuesday, April 03, 2018.
See also:
BWorld 197, Estimating electricity price hikes because of TRAIN, Part 2, March 22, 2018
BWorld 198, Three levels of global disruption, March 24, 2018
BWorld 199, Charity and giving should not be legislated, March 27, 2018
BWorld 200, IPR in the ASEAN and plain packaging in the West, April 03, 2018
Matter is energy …
Energy is light … We are all light beings.”
— Albert Einstein
Several recent events in the Philippines energy sector
which when implemented, might mean an extended and long-term penitence for
electricity consumers nationwide.
One is the planned expanded “environmental rights” to be
put in the draft Constitution by Retired Chief Justice and Consultative
Committee (ConCom) Chairman Reynato Puno. Two, the Energy Regulatory Commission
(ERC) meeting with anti-coal groups Sanlakas and Philippine Movement for
Climate Justice (PMCJ) with the ERC saying that it will “explore the
possibility of incorporating environmental policies into its relevant upcoming
policies…”
The ConCom chairman’s plan will open up a floodgate of
endless environmental militance. It will be harder for companies to put up new
airports and expressways, new malls and commercial districts, new factories and
industrial zones, new universities and residential condos, new coal or gas
plants because militants and environmental lobbyists can easily assert that the
area is “reserved” for nature. But they can easily lobby to put up expansive
“green” solar plants, wind farms, etc.
Chairman Puno said the expanded environmental rights will
cover “Right to clean air and clean water, right to a healthy environment and
ecology…”
If that is the case, government should prohibit candles
and gensets in cases of brownouts. Gensets are noisy and run on diesel and hence,
very polluting. Candles often cause fires. People should rely only on
intermittent wind-solar as much as possible. If the wind does not blow and if
the sun does not shine, people will be then left to endure brownouts.
Chairman Puno also said that there will be “stronger writ
of kalikasan in the bill of rights so that it may not be subject to withdrawal
or revision by the Congress or the Supreme Court.”
This is related to the second event as there are many
anti-coal groups which also hate any brownouts that coal plants precisely want
to prevent.
In August 2012, a group of ecologist-militants and allied
organizations have successfully stopped the construction of a 600 MW coal power
plant in Subic on the “writ of kalikasan” argument issued by the Supreme Court.
The delay in the construction of that big power plant has contributed to higher
price pressure in the Luzon grid in recent years.
Anti-coal activists think that all MW are the same.
This is wrong.
A 100 MW from wind or solar plant at 11 a.m. can become
20 MW or 5 MW at 11:05 a.m. when the wind suddenly stops blowing, when clouds
grow dark, or when it rains. Whereas a 100 MW from coal or gas will be 100 MW
for 24 hours whether the wind blows or not, whether it is a sunny or cloudy day
or night time.
Below are some numbers for ASEAN countries from the
International Energy Agency (IEA). Demand for power generation is in million
tons oil equivalent (mtoe), electrical capacity in Gigawatts (1GW = 1,000 MW),
and electricity generation in terawatthours (TWh). 2000 and 2015 data are
actual, 2016 are estimates, 2025 and 2030 are projections (see table).
Check out the numbers for coal — projected electrical
capacity in the region in 2030 is only 29% of total but projected electricity
generation is 40% of total. The opposite is the case for other renewables
(wind, solar, geothermal), nearly 11% of power capacity in 2030 but projected
to produce only 7.4% of actual electricity. If geothermal is removed from this
group, electricity generation will become even smaller.
During the S&P Global/Platts’ Philippine Energy Forum
last March 20, 2018 at Grand Hyatt BGC, S&P analyst Deepak Kannan observed
that from 2000 to 2016 in the ASEAN, “Oil continues to be a dominant source of
energy accounting for 34%, coal demand has more than tripled accounting for
17%.”
It is not wise that environmental militance be
incorporated in the Constitution. Any environmental advocacy should be done via
legislation, not put in the charter. The ERC should also be wary not to commit
anything to the anti-coal groups because they hop from one venue to another to
promote their ecological-socialist agenda.
----------------
See also:
BWorld 197, Estimating electricity price hikes because of TRAIN, Part 2, March 22, 2018
BWorld 198, Three levels of global disruption, March 24, 2018
BWorld 199, Charity and giving should not be legislated, March 27, 2018
BWorld 200, IPR in the ASEAN and plain packaging in the West, April 03, 2018
No comments:
Post a Comment