* This is my first article in the Asia Times, published last month. More than 2,700 shares as of today, thanks readers.
Inflation is finally catching up with Philippine
President Rodrigo Duterte’s high octane economic stimulus measures, a fast
growth-geared policy push known locally as “Dutertenomics.”
Statistics released this week showed inflation rose 5.7%
in July, the fastest rate in over five years, according to the National
Economic Development Authority, a state agency. It marked the fifth consecutive
month that inflation breached the central bank’s 2%-4% target band, leading to
market speculation that it will soon hike interest rates.
The surge in prices has sparked a local debate over
whether global or local factors are more to blame. Economic analysts note that
inflation rates were modest as recently as late last year, clocking in at 3%
and 2.9% in November and December respectively.
However, Duterte’s controversial Tax Reform for
Acceleration and Inclusion (TRAIN) law came into force in January, a
broad-based tax hike that many believe has driven the inflationary trend.
Indeed, inflation has steadily risen in recent months: 3.4% in January, 3.8% in
February, 4.3% in March, 4.5% in April, 4.6% in May, 5.2% in June, and 5.7% in
July, or almost double the December 2017 level of 2.9%.
Duterte’s tax law was passed to help finance the
government’s ultra-ambitious infrastructure spending plans, estimated at 8
trillion pesos (US$150 billion) over six years, as well as social welfare
programs that aim to reduce poverty from 21% to 15% by the end of his term in
2022. While taxes have risen, widespread infrastructure-building has largely
failed to materialize.
Still, the Philippines has recently been among Asia’s fastest
growing economies, with gross domestic product (GDP) growth of 6.9% in 2016 and
6.7% last year. But that growth is now decelerating as inflationary pressures
start to weigh against consumption and investment. Second quarter GDP growth
fell to 6%, from 6.6% in the first quarter. That means first half GDP growth
was only 6.3%, down significantly from the government’s full-year target of 7%.
Duterte’s economic managers, including officials at the
Department of Finance (DOF), National Economic Development Authority (NEDA),
Department of Budget and Management (DBM) and Department of Trade and Industry
(DTI), have played down the TRAIN tax’s impact on galloping prices while at the
same time scrambled to offer credible alternative explanations for the inflationary
surge.
They have generally pointed to three main factors
supposedly beyond their policy control, namely rising global oil prices, a
recent fast depreciation of the peso which is currently among Asia’s worst
performing currencies this year, and “profiteering” by big and small private
businesses that have allegedly unscrupulously marked up their prices.
While the TRAIN law has cut personal income taxes, it has
raised several other levies, especially for energy sources such as oil,
liquefied petroleum gas and coal. Sin taxes for sugary drinks and tobacco have
also been upped, while an expanded 12% value-added tax (VAT) now covers more
economic sectors, including electricity transmission and foreign
currency-denominated sales.
Official attempts to mostly blame higher global oil
prices for the local surge in prices, however, doesn’t hold statistically when
compared with other net-fuel importers in the region. Indeed, other
oil-importing nations such as Thailand, South Korea and Sri Lanka have all seen
a decline in inflation in the first half of this year compared to their full
year 2017 rates.
The inflation differential for
developed countries between January-June 2018 vis-a-vis 2017 is also
statistically miniscule, measuring -0.1 for the United Kingdom, 0.1 for
Germany, 0.4 for France and the United States, and 0.6 for Canada.
Instead, it is mostly domestic factors that are driving
the Philippines’ inflation situation. First and foremost, inflation is hitting
the poorest 30% of Filipino households harder than other demographic groups. In
the first half of 2018, overall Philippine inflation was 4.3% but for poor
households it was higher at 5%.
That’s because while “food and non-alcoholic beverages”
comprise only 38% of the overall Consumer Price Index (CPI) basket, used for
calculating the national inflation rate, the products constitute 61% of the
poor’s consumption. The telling statistics were calculated by Dr Dennis Mapa,
dean of the University of the Philippines School of Statistics (UPSS).
Nor is there any near-term relief in sight. Fare hikes
for taxis, buses and point-to-point air-conditioned vans will soon come
on-stream, as will phase two tax hikes on oil, LPG and coal in January 2019. A
third phase tax hike on energy will be imposed in January 2020 as part of the
Train tax reforms. Firms are also expected to start raising wages due to labor
demands over TRAIN’s impact on prices, leading to a potential virtuous cycle of
inflation.
No comments:
Post a Comment