Tuesday, March 26, 2019

PH's debt/GDP ratio stopped declining under Duterte

Until the last full year of Gloria Arroyo in 2009, PH's debt/GDP ratio was 54.8%. Then came the Benigno Aquino admin, the ratio kept falling with numerator (borrowings) controlled while the denominator (GDP) kept expanding, only 42.1% by 2016. Then Duterte admin, the decline in ratio has stopped. If the trend under the Aquino admin continued, we should only have about 39%, not 42% under Duterte.


Dutertenomics lousily takes credit for the low debt/GDP ratio when it was the previous administration that worked hard to reduce the ratio. The purpose of Dutertenomics is to reverse the gains and momentum of the previous govt, via shameless over-borrowings even if there is no economic turmoil/crisis.

#fiscalirresponsibility #spendspendspend #taxtaxtax #borrowborrowborrow #Dutertenomics.

BWorld 306, MORE stock market development

* This is my article in BusinessWorld yesterday, March 25, 2019.


 Continuing the Market-Oriented Reforms for Efficiency (MORE) series in this column, we look at one of the important indicators of an economy’s attractiveness to private business, entrepreneurship and job creation, the stock market.

Unlike foreign direct investments (FDI) which are long-term and, hence, require lots of basic soft and hard infrastructure, portfolio and stocks investments are often short-term, with investors buying today and selling after a month, or a week, or within hours. Thus, the stock market reflects the long- and short-term business sentiments.

The Philippines stock market has experienced good expansion in the previous decade, and further expanded until 2015. It has tanked though at the end of 2016 during the Duterte administration, grew in 2017, but declined again early this year.

Thailand and Indonesia have started at similar levels with the Philippines in 2000 and, since then, have expanded much faster and are twice that of the Philippines today. Vietnam started late but has shown consistent increases. One reason for this is that the Philippines has a small number of listed companies, only 267 (see table).


  
Taiwan is not included in the WB report but it is listed in the WFE, it has market capitalization of $1,118.3 B in February 2019 from 1,716 listed companies.

China is wobbling from the ongoing trade dispute with the US and many domestic problems are surfacing today, like huge debts by the corporate sector, state-owned enterprises and local governments.

The Philippines needs to attract more companies to be publicly listed. This will invite more individual and corporate investors and help expand market capitalization. I am not aware of the major reasons why there is low participation by corporations in the local stock market. Could it be the huge minimum capitalization required, big and voluminous SEC requirements, BIR alert of more taxes if companies are listed? Or cultural, companies would rather remain “low key” to preserve their clan-dominated corporate structure and investment?

Hope that such hurdles will be addressed soon. In particular, the DOF-BIR should not be too tax-hungry that they can scare many companies to be more publicly transparent.

There are two forums on the stock market this week. First is the “BusinessWorld Stockmarket Roundtable 2019” on March 25 at Conrad Hotel. The four speakers are Roel Arco Refran, COO of the Philippine Stock Exchange, Michael “Mike” Gerard Enriquez, Chief Investment Officer of Sunlife Financial, Justino “Jun” Calaycay, Jr., Head of Research and Engagement Department of Philstocks Financial, and Marvin Fausto, Business Development Consultant of COL Financial.

Second event is the “Breakfast and Market Update” at the PSE on March 29, exclusive for members of the UP School of Economics Alumni Association. It is co-organized by Hans Sicat, former PSE president and a school alumni.

Last year, the “BusinessWorld Stockmarket Roundtable 2018” was held in February at Makati Shangrila Hotel. The four speakers were Augusto “Gus” Cosio Jr. of First Metro Asset Management, April Lynn Tan of COL Financial Group, Jun Calaycay, Jr. of Philstocks, and Mike Gerard Enriquez of Sunlife.
--------------

See also: 

Monday, March 25, 2019

On the Trump-Russia hoax, the scammers are silent

Hoaxhers -- like NYT, CNN, Wapo, Dems, etc. -- of the world, unite! You have nothing to lose but gullible and emotional followers :-)

Sound of silence from people who for nearly 3 years were posting regularly of "Trump as Putin puppet". Spreading lies is wrong if it affects them but is correct and fine if it fits their personal biases and dogma.

Some reports here. The illustrations I got from the web.

Trump did not collude with Russia, says Mueller, and is cleared of obstruction by the attorney general
PUBLISHED SUN, MAR 24 2019 • 3:10 PM EDT |
Jacob Pramuk  Spencer Kimball

Trump "Totally Exonerated", Calls For Investigation Into "Illegal Takedown That Failed"
by Tyler Durden  Mon, 03/25/2019 - 05:44

Gregg Jarrett: Trump-Russia 'collusion' was always a hoax -- and dirtiest political trick in modern US history
Gregg Jarrett  March25, 2019

Trump Is Going To Repeat This Until November 2020. Thanks, MSNBC.

by Tyler Durden Mon, 03/25/2019 - 10:15


‘Two years of unceasing lies’: Russia responds to the Mueller report summary
Sam Meredith  March 25, 2019

FLASHBACK: ‘Shattered’ Book: Clinton Campaign Hatched Russian Narrative 24 Hours After Hillary Loss to Trump
By Jerome Hudson  25 March 2019

Meanwhile, Trump's recent tweets are getting 300k+, 400k+ likes.


Meanwhile, where are HRC and Obama? Will they and their friends invent a new hoax, like Trump-Timbuktu or Congo collusion?

Sunday, March 24, 2019

BWorld 305, MORE electricity supply in East Asia

* This is my column in BusinessWorld last March 22, 2019.


Continuing the Market-Oriented Reforms for Efficiency (MORE) series in this column, we tackle the importance of more electricity production in the development of Asia-Pacific economies.

On Tuesday, March 19, I attended the joint press conference of the Department of Energy (DoE), the National Power Corporation (Napocor), National Transmission Corporation (Transco), National Grid Corporation of the Philippines (NGCP), and Manila Electric Co. (Meralco) in formally announcing the Philippines hosting of two big international energy events.

First, the Association of the Electricity Supply Industry of East Asia and Western Pacific (AESIEAP) in September 2019 in Shangrila Mactan, Cebu; second, the Conference of Electric Power Supply Industry (CEPSI) at the Philippine International Convention Center (PICC) in November 2020.

During the open forum, I commented that the Philippines holding these two big energy events that are technology-neutral on energy sources is important, to contrast with the renewable energy (RE) favoritism of the Asian Development Bank’s Asia Clean Energy Forum (ACEF). The latter is an annual event glamorizing the role of wind-solar and other renewables while implicitly demonizing the role of fossil fuels in energy development in Asia. Their delegates, speakers, and sponsors fly from all over the world on fossil fuel then directly or indirectly lambast fossil fuel and talk of a “decarbonized world” via RE favoritism and cronyism.

Having a technology-neutral energy policy is important for fast economic growth and expansion of Asian economies. For instance, despite the decades-long lobby to glamorize and subsidize wind-solar and other renewables, fossil fuels provided 74% of total electricity generation in Asia-Pacific in 2017, with many countries being more than 80% fossil fuels-dependent — India, Australia, Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand, Taiwan, etc. (see table 1).


Other AESIEAP members with low electricity generation are Cambodia, Laos, Macau, Nepal, Papua New Guinea, and Sri Lanka. Hong Kong is also a member; its reported domestic electricity production is small because mainland China supplies the rest.

High power generation coincides or correlates with high economic expansion. The numbers are shown below spanning 30 years from 1987 to 2017. High correlation is shown in some countries like S. Korea, Indonesia, Malaysia, India, Taiwan, Thailand, and Bangladesh (see table 2).


As shown in table 1, the Philippines still has small power generation despite its huge population of 108 million (two times that of S. Korea, four times that of Australia). We need more investments in the sector — in generation, transmission, distribution, and supply.

Energy efficiency as “substitute” for more power generation is not enough. If one will drive at night in many provinces, one will notice that national and provincial roads are dark and conducive to accidents, except in some city centers.

In many instances, government taxes, permits and bureaucracies, plus occasional price control (like the Wholesale Electricity Spot Market price cap), are among the hindrances to more energy development. Government should learn to step back on these.
----------------

See also: 

US Marines training for SCS/WPS island seizures

See these stories below. Go Trump, Pompeo, Shanahan. Just enforce existing international rule of law on freedom of navigation and territorial sovereignty of countries in the region.
----------------

Marines Seize Pacific Island As Training For War With China
by Tyler Durden Fri, 03/22/2019 - 17:15

US Marines are practicing seizing small islands as a possible China fight looms in the Pacific
Ryan Pickrell Mar. 21, 2019, 10:32 AM

Marines Seize an Airfield and Small Island While Testing Tactics for Fight Against China (excerpt)
(Source: Military Times; posted March 22, 2019)
By Shawn Snow

Marines seize an airfield and small island while testing tactics for fight against China
By: Shawn Snow     March 22, 2019

Beijing Threatens "Retaliation" Over Sale Of F-16s To Taiwan
by Tyler Durden  Fri, 03/22/2019 - 21:45

Saturday, March 23, 2019

BWorld 304, MORE tax relief in CIT

* This is my article in BusinessWorld last March 19, 2019.


Starting this week, this column will produce a series of Market-Oriented Reforms for Efficiency (MORE) articles related to recently enacted laws and proposed legislations in the Philippines on various sectors. Thus, recent Republic Acts (RA) and some pending bills for bicameral committee meetings after the May 2019 elections will be discussed.

First on the list is the need to simplify and reduce tax rates for business that create sustained jobs for Filipinos. Currently in East Asia, the Philippines has (a) the highest corporate income tax (CIT), (b) among the highest in withholding tax for dividends and interest income, (c) the highest withholding tax for royalties, and (d) among the highest VAT or gross sales tax (GST).

These non-attractive fiscal policies plus the Constitution restrictions on foreign investments, among others, contribute to the Philippines having the lowest foreign direct investments (FDI) stock among more mature economies in the region (see table 1).



The main bill under deliberation is HB 8083, the “Tax Reform for Attracting Better and High-Quality Opportunities” or TRABAHO bill. Originally it was called the “TRAIN 2” bill but with the generally adverse impact of the TRAIN law of 2017, the DOF changed its moniker to TRABAHO.

Among the important provisions is the reduction of CIT from the current 30% to 28% in 2021, 26% in 2023, 24% in 2025, 22% in 2027, and 20% in 2029. In exchange it intends to remove certain fiscal incentives that supposedly “lower” DOF tax collections, especially the 5% gross income earned (GIE).

The Senate version intends to cut CIT from 30% to 25% in year 1 of implementation and not staggered to 10 years.

TRABAHO bill has been passed on third reading in the House last September 2018, awaiting action from the Senate for a possible bicameral meeting in late May this year.

If the government is sincere in really attracting more local and foreign investments, it should either (a) cut CIT to low, flat 15-16% within year 1 of implementation and abolish the GIE, or (b) cut CIT to 21-25% and raise the GIE to 7%.

There is real, not fictional, CIT competition in the region. For instance, Singapore’s 17% is positioned near Hong Kong’s 16.5%. Socialist Vietnam until 2013 has 25%, became 20% in 2016 (see table 2).


Let us hope that when Senators and Congressmen/women meet for a bicameral meeting after the May elections, or when they refile the bill in the next Congress in July, they will be more aware that capital and people are more mobile these days. Both the national and local governments should not be too tax-hungry and reducing the tax rates, lowering the number of permits and payments, will greatly help in attracting both local and foreign investments, and retaining them for the long-haul.
---------------

See also: 

Agri Econ 30, Tractors controlled by local politicians

There is no "market failure" in tractor use and rental. More privately-owned tractors (like privately-owned tricycles/jeeps/buses/vans for hire), more competition, the rental cost goes down, farmers benefit, taxpayers do not owe anything to anyone as no tax money was used to procure tractors and maintain them. Local politicians should be disfranchised with arbitrary power to select who can use, who cannot use, the tractors.

Control of tractor gives mayor more power
By: Tonette Orejas  05:18 AM March 11, 201

"The four-wheel drive tractor costs P2.495 million while the harvester with a heavy-duty transport trailer was worth P1.995 million."

Wow, P2.5 M for one tractor. If those people/bureaucrats used their own money, they won't buy that big, heavy tractor for ricefields, it's designed more for sugarcane or corn or tobacco farming. Ricefields often have soft soil due to water inundation, they would need smaller, lighter tractor, about 1/2 or 2/3 the size of the tractor in photo.

Wise and practical private agribusinesspersons won't buy that Kubota 540 tractor for P2.5 M. They can buy a Kubota 225 to 300, brand new at around P1M each, 2nd hand (about 6-12 years old) at P300-500k each. These smaller Kubota (or Yanmar) tractors are more practical in PH ricefields because the soil is soft for 2nd cropping, heavy tractors can get stuck in mud even if they have big tires.

Only politicians and bureaucrats will go for the more expensive machines/tractors, the tong-pats is bigger for just one unit.

And this is the danger of using revenues from rice tariffication to buy farm machines and given away for free to farmer groups. The purchasing agencies, DA or LGUs or DILG, can go for the more expensive tractors and harvesters -- which will also require more expensive maintenance. The 'commission' will be bigger per tractor, and local politicians, from Mayor to Barangay Capt, can use the machines to sway political votes and support. Non-supporters likely won't be able to use the machines, or they can use but they must pay rent; only supporters can use, for free except diesel.

Most policy makers and supporters, lobbyists do not realize some details about soil character and appropriate tractors. I think for that big Kubota tractor in the Inquirer photo, it's good for sugarcane, corn, tobacco farming where the plots are larger, the soil is not too soft with water inundation.

When that big tractor gets stuck in a muddy rice field, it will also require another big tractor to pull it out. Small tractors may have difficulty bailing it from the mud.
----------------

See also: 

Friday, March 22, 2019

BWorld 303, Water surplus vs water shortage

* This is my column in BusinessWorld last March 15, 2019.


In terms of water supply for the Philippines and many other tropical countries, we have a mixture of news. First the good news — we have too much rain water yearly, floodings damage lots of public and private properties, crops, and drown or kill many people.

Second, the bad news — we do not have enough deep and wide lakes, or dams (man-made) to catch, “harvest” and store those huge volume of rain water.

Third, the worse news — some natural water catchments like rivers, streams and low-lying areas are often silted if not covered with soil to become new residential, commercial or industrial zones.

Let us check some numbers to prove the good news, that our problem is not lack of water but lots of water.

In 2014, the Philippines has naturally produced an estimated 479 billion cubic meters (bcm), higher than those in S. Korea, Thailand, Vietnam and Japan. In terms of per capita production, we have 4,757 cubic meters per year (see table 1).


Need more proof? In terms of annual freshwater withdrawals, the Philippines in 2009 has produced nearly 82 bcm, at par with Vietnam and Japan and higher than Thailand, S. Korea and Malaysia. But in terms of water productivity, ours is low, only $2.3 per cubic meter of freshwater withdrawals (FW), see table 2.


What the numbers imply would be the following.

One, we should have more dams to store lots of flood waters yearly. This will greatly reduce flash flooding that damage some midland and lowland areas, while storing water for the dry months of March to May.

Two, conduct regular, large-scale dredging of heavily silted rivers and lakes. Like the many rivers and streams in Bulacan, Pampanga and Tarlac that are silted with lahar from Mt. Pinatubo since the 90s. PHIVOLCS estimate that lahar deposits in the mountains can continue to flow downstream for the next 30 years or so.

Three, encourage more private sector participation and investments in building more dams. The reversal from integrated PPP (construction then O&M done by one private entity) to hybrid PPP (construction via ODA/budget then O&M by another entity) of Kaliwa Dam is a big mistake that resulted in delays in construction and lead to some P18.7 B of new loans to China.

Four, have more open pit mines, not less, then when they are mined out, do not cover them with soil and reforest. Leave them as deep and wide man-made lakes that will help store flood waters. The new lake can be used for fishery, tourism and water sports, etc.

Five, allow private ownership of man-made lakes, like the mined-out open pit mines. The artificial lake should be under management and control by the private mining company or consortium of private firms.

The current water shortage problem in many parts of Metro Manila is totally unnecessary and avoidable. El Niño and La Niña are natural phenomena that occur in predictable cycles, alternating usually every two years per episode. There should be less politics, more private sector investments and management of water resources.
---------------

See also: