A friend posted today that GDP growth of 6 percent on average,
there is tremendous amount of shallowness to the economic growth of recent years. A simplistic, quantitative overview of the Philippines' macroeconomic health tends to come at the expense of a qualitative assessment of the living standards of ordinary Filipinos.
I commented that an average GDP growth rate of 1 or lower will make them happy. Then there will be no "shallowness to the economic
growth of recent years."
If one would look around, he/she will notice that the poor no longer ride carabaos or
cows; they ride motorcycles, or even electric bikes. The poor seldom send mails
via post office or send smoke signal; they have smart phones, send text messages or
emails via fb or yahoo in their cell phones. There is "no growth for the poor." :-)
Another friend commented that in his neighborhood, some people just drink and party, they don't or seldom work. This could mean that other family members and relatives give them money regularly, and such extra money is indicator of business and economic growth.
Uhhmmm. Ok, then maybe we should grow only 0.1 percent, or even zero. No growth, no
social cost, no drunkards/tanggero, no videoke boys, no smart phones or motorcycles, no
frequent road accidents.
Ipagbawal ang GDP growth!
Another friend commented that his neighbor, whole family have no work or business, no relatives who support them, and yet they eat everyday.This means that such family may be living on stealing or extortion. Which means their victims, other people have regular work or business, But as observed by another friend above, there is "high social cost" to growth. No growth, no victims of stealing and extortion, no thieves and extortionists.
Ipagbawal ang GDP growth!
Ipagbawal ang GDP growth!
There are whiners everywhere. Whether the economy grows at only 0.6 percent or 6 or 10 percent, some people will simply complain. The only thing that can placate them is forced equality in society, if there is socialism.
That is one problem of modern capitalism. It is becoming more and more efficient, more surplus-producing, that even people who do not want to work; people whose work is to produce more prohibitions, regulations and taxation; and people whose work is for the demise of capitalism, are sustained and supported, directly or indirectly.
-------------
See also:
Fat-Free Econ 11: GDP Growth and Private Sector Role, June 02, 2012
Fat-Free Econ 34: Rise in Unemployment Rate Not Exactly Bad, December 20, 2012
Fat-Free Econ 37: PH GDP Growth 2012, February 02, 2013
Fat-Free Econ 38: Jobless Growth vs. Jobless Non-Growth, February 12, 2012
Fat Free Econ 42: NSCB vs SWS Data on Poverty, April 30, 2013 Fat Free Econ 43: On the Philippines' Fast Economic Growth, June 04, 2013
Fat Free Econ 49: Growth Amid Storms, December 03, 2013
Tax Cut 18: On 10% Flat Tax, Greco Belgica and GDP Growth, March 27, 2014
No comments:
Post a Comment