* This is my column in BusinessWorld last March 11, 2018.
See also:
“When a new source of taxation is found it never means,
in practice, that the old source is abandoned. It merely means that the
politicians have two ways of milking the taxpayer where they had one before.”
— H. L. Mencken, American journalist, satirist
As the public still has to adjust to the inflationary
pressures of the new law called Tax Reform for Acceleration and Inclusion —
Package 1 (TRAIN 1), TRAIN 2 is already in Congress. Among the targets are
further tax hikes in “sin” products, and some NGOs that speak, write, and argue
like government have been calling to further raise alcohol and tobacco taxes.
Such calls are based on certain premises and hypothesis
like: (1) Philippines tobacco and alcohol consumption per capita is among the
highest in Asia and the world; and, (2) the overall health of Filipinos is
stagnating if not deteriorating because of high alcohol and tobacco use. Thus,
consumption of sin product must be discouraged further via higher taxes plus
other measures like graphic warnings.
How true are such premises and hence, how valid is the
more-taxes-please measure as the purported solution?
The good news is that some basic data — like smoking
incidence — are available and can be found at Our World in Data, a project of
the University of Oxford. The bad news is that the data does not seem to
support or corroborate those two premises and hypothesis (see table).
The numbers in the table show the following:
1. Philippines tobacco use as of 2012 was not that high
and was lower than tobacco use of our richer and healthier neighbors like Japan
and South Korea. Alcohol use in 2015 was lower than the global average of 6.3
liters per person per year.
2. Philippines life expectancy keeps rising, not falling
or remaining steady, although it is among the lowest in the region.
3. People in countries with a high incidence of smoking
also have high life expectancies. Brunei, Taiwan, South Korea, Japan, China,
the Philippines, and Singapore have high cigarette use — at least 18 sticks per
day per smoker in 2012 — and their life expectancy was at least 76 years in
2015 — except in the Philippines where it was only 68 years.
4. People in countries with low cigarette use (less than
12.5 sticks per smoker per day) also have low life expectancies of only 69
years or less.
These observations tend to contradict the two premises
and hypothesis mentioned above. There are many possible explanations for this,
two of which would be the following:
1. People in rich countries can afford to buy more
tobacco and alcohol products despite the rise in prices due to rising sin
taxes; and,
2. People in poorer countries consume “less tobacco”
referring to the legal and branded products, but in reality, they consume “more
tobacco” from illegal, illicit, and fake/counterfeit products and suppliers.
And such consumption is not captured by official government data.
So the statement “more sin taxes = less alcohol and
tobacco use” can be wrong.
Another possibility is that higher sin taxes can lead to
more smuggling, more illicit trade of counterfeit products that are cheap and
more affordable to more people, which can lead to more smoking and drinking.
Even rich and developed Australia, which has more strict
regulations against tobacco use, has experienced a rise in cigarettes
smuggling. In a KPMG report in March 2017 entitled “Illicit Tobacco in
Australia, 2016 Full Year Report,” the estimated share of illicit and smuggled
tobacco was 10.8% of total tobacco consumption, average for 2007-2012. This
rose to 14% average for 2013-2016.
Instead of calling for higher sin tax rates, the
government should focus on significantly controlling smuggled and illicit
products that are cheap and readily available. This alone will significantly
reduce the incidence of smoking and drinking.
Another compromise would be a rise in sin taxes but
income tax rates (personal and corporate) and/or VAT rates should go further
down. The people should be spared from government’s policy and mentality of
endless tax hikes, regardless of administration.
--------------
See also:
BWorld 192, Cobalt mining and TRAIN, March 16, 2018
BWorld 193, TRAIN, inflation and emerging DOE price control, March 16, 2018
BWorld 193, TRAIN, inflation and emerging DOE price control, March 16, 2018
BWorld 194, How ‘pro-labor’ policies work against labor, March 17, 2018
No comments:
Post a Comment